Can't capture improvement of functional dependencies
Type Families with Class, Type Classes with Family discusses instance improvement with the example
class Collection c e | c -> e where
empty :: c
add :: e -> c -> c
instance Collection [a] a where
empty :: [a]
empty = []
add :: a -> [a] -> [a]
add = (:)
I wondered how to express that x ~ Int can be deduced from Collection [Int] x using improvement, I first attempted using the constraints machinery:
data Dict c where
Dict :: c => Dict c
newtype a :- b = Sub (a => Dict b)
but I'm not able to construct a term of type Collection [Int] x :- (Int ~ x) proving that Collection [Int] x entails Int ~ x:
ghci> Sub Dict :: Collection [Int] x :- (Int ~ x)
<interactive>:52:5: error:
• Couldn't match type ‘x1’ with ‘Int’ arising from a use of ‘Dict’
‘x1’ is a rigid type variable bound by
an expression type signature:
forall x1. Collection [Int] x1 :- Int ~ x1
at <interactive>:52:13
• In the first argument of ‘Sub’, namely ‘Dict’
In the expression: Sub Dict :: Collection [Int] x :- (Int ~ x)
In an equation for ‘it’:
it = Sub Dict :: Collection [Int] x :- (Int ~ x)
Is this due to overlapping instances or something?
Trac metadata
| Trac field | Value |
|---|---|
| Version | 8.0.1 |
| Type | Task |
| TypeOfFailure | OtherFailure |
| Priority | normal |
| Resolution | Unresolved |
| Component | None |
| Test case | |
| Differential revisions | |
| BlockedBy | |
| Related | |
| Blocking | |
| CC | |
| Operating system | |
| Architecture |