Skip to content

Incomplete-pattern checking for n+k patterns is not implemented

The check for incomplete patterns does not understand about n+k patterns. Here's an example:

f 0     = True
f (n+1) = False

GHC says, rather confusingly:

    Warning: Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive
	     In the definition of `f':
		 Patterns not matched: #x with #x `notElem` [0#]

The reason is in compiler/deSugar/Check.hs which says

	-- Horrible hack.  The simplify_pat stuff converts NPlusK pats to WildPats
	-- which of course loses the info that they can fail to match.  So we 
	-- stick in a CanFail as if it were a guard.
	-- The Right Thing to do is for the whole system to treat NPlusK pats properly

See #595 (closed)

Trac metadata
Trac field Value
Version 6.4.2
Type Bug
TypeOfFailure OtherFailure
Priority normal
Resolution Unresolved
Component Compiler
Test case
Differential revisions
BlockedBy
Related
Blocking
CC
Operating system Unknown
Architecture Unknown
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information