{-
(c) The University of Glasgow 2006
(c) The GRASP/AQUA Project, Glasgow University, 1992-1998
Arity and eta expansion
-}
{-# LANGUAGE CPP #-}
-- | Arity and eta expansion
module CoreArity (
manifestArity, exprArity, typeArity, exprBotStrictness_maybe,
exprEtaExpandArity, findRhsArity, CheapFun, etaExpand
) where
#include "HsVersions.h"
import CoreSyn
import CoreFVs
import CoreUtils
import CoreSubst
import Demand
import Var
import VarEnv
import Id
import Type
import TyCon ( initRecTc, checkRecTc )
import Coercion
import BasicTypes
import Unique
import DynFlags ( DynFlags, GeneralFlag(..), gopt )
import Outputable
import FastString
import Pair
import Util ( debugIsOn )
{-
************************************************************************
* *
manifestArity and exprArity
* *
************************************************************************
exprArity is a cheap-and-cheerful version of exprEtaExpandArity.
It tells how many things the expression can be applied to before doing
any work. It doesn't look inside cases, lets, etc. The idea is that
exprEtaExpandArity will do the hard work, leaving something that's easy
for exprArity to grapple with. In particular, Simplify uses exprArity to
compute the ArityInfo for the Id.
Originally I thought that it was enough just to look for top-level lambdas, but
it isn't. I've seen this
foo = PrelBase.timesInt
We want foo to get arity 2 even though the eta-expander will leave it
unchanged, in the expectation that it'll be inlined. But occasionally it
isn't, because foo is blacklisted (used in a rule).
Similarly, see the ok_note check in exprEtaExpandArity. So
f = __inline_me (\x -> e)
won't be eta-expanded.
And in any case it seems more robust to have exprArity be a bit more intelligent.
But note that (\x y z -> f x y z)
should have arity 3, regardless of f's arity.
-}
manifestArity :: CoreExpr -> Arity
-- ^ manifestArity sees how many leading value lambdas there are,
-- after looking through casts
manifestArity (Lam v e) | isId v = 1 + manifestArity e
| otherwise = manifestArity e
manifestArity (Tick t e) | not (tickishIsCode t) = manifestArity e
manifestArity (Cast e _) = manifestArity e
manifestArity _ = 0
---------------
exprArity :: CoreExpr -> Arity
-- ^ An approximate, fast, version of 'exprEtaExpandArity'
exprArity e = go e
where
go (Var v) = idArity v
go (Lam x e) | isId x = go e + 1
| otherwise = go e
go (Tick t e) | not (tickishIsCode t) = go e
go (Cast e co) = trim_arity (go e) (pSnd (coercionKind co))
-- Note [exprArity invariant]
go (App e (Type _)) = go e
go (App f a) | exprIsTrivial a = (go f - 1) `max` 0
-- See Note [exprArity for applications]
-- NB: coercions count as a value argument
go _ = 0
trim_arity :: Arity -> Type -> Arity
trim_arity arity ty = arity `min` length (typeArity ty)
---------------
typeArity :: Type -> [OneShotInfo]
-- How many value arrows are visible in the type?
-- We look through foralls, and newtypes
-- See Note [exprArity invariant]
typeArity ty
= go initRecTc ty
where
go rec_nts ty
| Just (bndr, ty') <- splitPiTy_maybe ty
= if isIdLikeBinder bndr
then typeOneShot (binderType bndr) : go rec_nts ty'
else go rec_nts ty'
| Just (tc,tys) <- splitTyConApp_maybe ty
, Just (ty', _) <- instNewTyCon_maybe tc tys
, Just rec_nts' <- checkRecTc rec_nts tc -- See Note [Expanding newtypes]
-- in TyCon
-- , not (isClassTyCon tc) -- Do not eta-expand through newtype classes
-- -- See Note [Newtype classes and eta expansion]
-- (no longer required)
= go rec_nts' ty'
-- Important to look through non-recursive newtypes, so that, eg
-- (f x) where f has arity 2, f :: Int -> IO ()
-- Here we want to get arity 1 for the result!
--
-- AND through a layer of recursive newtypes
-- e.g. newtype Stream m a b = Stream (m (Either b (a, Stream m a b)))
| otherwise
= []
---------------
exprBotStrictness_maybe :: CoreExpr -> Maybe (Arity, StrictSig)
-- A cheap and cheerful function that identifies bottoming functions
-- and gives them a suitable strictness signatures. It's used during
-- float-out
exprBotStrictness_maybe e
= case getBotArity (arityType env e) of
Nothing -> Nothing
Just ar -> Just (ar, sig ar)
where
env = AE { ae_ped_bot = True, ae_cheap_fn = \ _ _ -> False }
sig ar = mkClosedStrictSig (replicate ar topDmd) botRes
-- For this purpose we can be very simple
{-
Note [exprArity invariant]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
exprArity has the following invariant:
(1) If typeArity (exprType e) = n,
then manifestArity (etaExpand e n) = n
That is, etaExpand can always expand as much as typeArity says
So the case analysis in etaExpand and in typeArity must match
(2) exprArity e <= typeArity (exprType e)
(3) Hence if (exprArity e) = n, then manifestArity (etaExpand e n) = n
That is, if exprArity says "the arity is n" then etaExpand really
can get "n" manifest lambdas to the top.
Why is this important? Because
- In TidyPgm we use exprArity to fix the *final arity* of
each top-level Id, and in
- In CorePrep we use etaExpand on each rhs, so that the visible lambdas
actually match that arity, which in turn means
that the StgRhs has the right number of lambdas
An alternative would be to do the eta-expansion in TidyPgm, at least
for top-level bindings, in which case we would not need the trim_arity
in exprArity. That is a less local change, so I'm going to leave it for today!
Note [Newtype classes and eta expansion]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NB: this nasty special case is no longer required, because
for newtype classes we don't use the class-op rule mechanism
at all. See Note [Single-method classes] in TcInstDcls. SLPJ May 2013
-------- Old out of date comments, just for interest -----------
We have to be careful when eta-expanding through newtypes. In general
it's a good idea, but annoyingly it interacts badly with the class-op
rule mechanism. Consider
class C a where { op :: a -> a }
instance C b => C [b] where
op x = ...
These translate to
co :: forall a. (a->a) ~ C a
$copList :: C b -> [b] -> [b]
$copList d x = ...
$dfList :: C b -> C [b]
{-# DFunUnfolding = [$copList] #-}
$dfList d = $copList d |> co@[b]
Now suppose we have:
dCInt :: C Int
blah :: [Int] -> [Int]
blah = op ($dfList dCInt)
Now we want the built-in op/$dfList rule will fire to give
blah = $copList dCInt
But with eta-expansion 'blah' might (and in Trac #3772, which is
slightly more complicated, does) turn into
blah = op (\eta. ($dfList dCInt |> sym co) eta)
and now it is *much* harder for the op/$dfList rule to fire, because
exprIsConApp_maybe won't hold of the argument to op. I considered
trying to *make* it hold, but it's tricky and I gave up.
The test simplCore/should_compile/T3722 is an excellent example.
-------- End of old out of date comments, just for interest -----------
Note [exprArity for applications]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When we come to an application we check that the arg is trivial.
eg f (fac x) does not have arity 2,
even if f has arity 3!
* We require that is trivial rather merely cheap. Suppose f has arity 2.
Then f (Just y)
has arity 0, because if we gave it arity 1 and then inlined f we'd get
let v = Just y in \w.
which has arity 0. And we try to maintain the invariant that we don't
have arity decreases.
* The `max 0` is important! (\x y -> f x) has arity 2, even if f is
unknown, hence arity 0
************************************************************************
* *
Computing the "arity" of an expression
* *
************************************************************************
Note [Definition of arity]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The "arity" of an expression 'e' is n if
applying 'e' to *fewer* than n *value* arguments
converges rapidly
Or, to put it another way
there is no work lost in duplicating the partial
application (e x1 .. x(n-1))
In the divegent case, no work is lost by duplicating because if the thing
is evaluated once, that's the end of the program.
Or, to put it another way, in any context C
C[ (\x1 .. xn. e x1 .. xn) ]
is as efficient as
C[ e ]
It's all a bit more subtle than it looks:
Note [One-shot lambdas]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider one-shot lambdas
let x = expensive in \y z -> E
We want this to have arity 1 if the \y-abstraction is a 1-shot lambda.
Note [Dealing with bottom]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A Big Deal with computing arities is expressions like
f = \x -> case x of
True -> \s -> e1
False -> \s -> e2
This happens all the time when f :: Bool -> IO ()
In this case we do eta-expand, in order to get that \s to the
top, and give f arity 2.
This isn't really right in the presence of seq. Consider
(f bot) `seq` 1
This should diverge! But if we eta-expand, it won't. We ignore this
"problem" (unless -fpedantic-bottoms is on), because being scrupulous
would lose an important transformation for many programs. (See
Trac #5587 for an example.)
Consider also
f = \x -> error "foo"
Here, arity 1 is fine. But if it is
f = \x -> case x of
True -> error "foo"
False -> \y -> x+y
then we want to get arity 2. Technically, this isn't quite right, because
(f True) `seq` 1
should diverge, but it'll converge if we eta-expand f. Nevertheless, we
do so; it improves some programs significantly, and increasing convergence
isn't a bad thing. Hence the ABot/ATop in ArityType.
So these two transformations aren't always the Right Thing, and we
have several tickets reporting unexpected bahaviour resulting from
this transformation. So we try to limit it as much as possible:
(1) Do NOT move a lambda outside a known-bottom case expression
case undefined of { (a,b) -> \y -> e }
This showed up in Trac #5557
(2) Do NOT move a lambda outside a case if all the branches of
the case are known to return bottom.
case x of { (a,b) -> \y -> error "urk" }
This case is less important, but the idea is that if the fn is
going to diverge eventually anyway then getting the best arity
isn't an issue, so we might as well play safe
(3) Do NOT move a lambda outside a case unless
(a) The scrutinee is ok-for-speculation, or
(b) more liberally: the scrutinee is cheap (e.g. a variable), and
-fpedantic-bottoms is not enforced (see Trac #2915 for an example)
Of course both (1) and (2) are readily defeated by disguising the bottoms.
4. Note [Newtype arity]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Non-recursive newtypes are transparent, and should not get in the way.
We do (currently) eta-expand recursive newtypes too. So if we have, say
newtype T = MkT ([T] -> Int)
Suppose we have
e = coerce T f
where f has arity 1. Then: etaExpandArity e = 1;
that is, etaExpandArity looks through the coerce.
When we eta-expand e to arity 1: eta_expand 1 e T
we want to get: coerce T (\x::[T] -> (coerce ([T]->Int) e) x)
HOWEVER, note that if you use coerce bogusly you can ge
coerce Int negate
And since negate has arity 2, you might try to eta expand. But you can't
decopose Int to a function type. Hence the final case in eta_expand.
Note [The state-transformer hack]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suppose we have
f = e
where e has arity n. Then, if we know from the context that f has
a usage type like
t1 -> ... -> tn -1-> t(n+1) -1-> ... -1-> tm -> ...
then we can expand the arity to m. This usage type says that
any application (x e1 .. en) will be applied to uniquely to (m-n) more args
Consider f = \x. let y =
in case x of
True -> foo
False -> \(s:RealWorld) -> e
where foo has arity 1. Then we want the state hack to
apply to foo too, so we can eta expand the case.
Then we expect that if f is applied to one arg, it'll be applied to two
(that's the hack -- we don't really know, and sometimes it's false)
See also Id.isOneShotBndr.
Note [State hack and bottoming functions]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's a terrible idea to use the state hack on a bottoming function.
Here's what happens (Trac #2861):
f :: String -> IO T
f = \p. error "..."
Eta-expand, using the state hack:
f = \p. (\s. ((error "...") |> g1) s) |> g2
g1 :: IO T ~ (S -> (S,T))
g2 :: (S -> (S,T)) ~ IO T
Extrude the g2
f' = \p. \s. ((error "...") |> g1) s
f = f' |> (String -> g2)
Discard args for bottomming function
f' = \p. \s. ((error "...") |> g1 |> g3
g3 :: (S -> (S,T)) ~ (S,T)
Extrude g1.g3
f'' = \p. \s. (error "...")
f' = f'' |> (String -> S -> g1.g3)
And now we can repeat the whole loop. Aargh! The bug is in applying the
state hack to a function which then swallows the argument.
This arose in another guise in Trac #3959. Here we had
catch# (throw exn >> return ())
Note that (throw :: forall a e. Exn e => e -> a) is called with [a = IO ()].
After inlining (>>) we get
catch# (\_. throw {IO ()} exn)
We must *not* eta-expand to
catch# (\_ _. throw {...} exn)
because 'catch#' expects to get a (# _,_ #) after applying its argument to
a State#, not another function!
In short, we use the state hack to allow us to push let inside a lambda,
but not to introduce a new lambda.
Note [ArityType]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ArityType is the result of a compositional analysis on expressions,
from which we can decide the real arity of the expression (extracted
with function exprEtaExpandArity).
Here is what the fields mean. If an arbitrary expression 'f' has
ArityType 'at', then
* If at = ABot n, then (f x1..xn) definitely diverges. Partial
applications to fewer than n args may *or may not* diverge.
We allow ourselves to eta-expand bottoming functions, even
if doing so may lose some `seq` sharing,
let x = in \y. error (g x y)
==> \y. let x = in error (g x y)
* If at = ATop as, and n=length as,
then expanding 'f' to (\x1..xn. f x1 .. xn) loses no sharing,
assuming the calls of f respect the one-shot-ness of
its definition.
NB 'f' is an arbitrary expression, eg (f = g e1 e2). This 'f'
can have ArityType as ATop, with length as > 0, only if e1 e2 are
themselves.
* In both cases, f, (f x1), ... (f x1 ... f(n-1)) are definitely
really functions, or bottom, but *not* casts from a data type, in
at least one case branch. (If it's a function in one case branch but
an unsafe cast from a data type in another, the program is bogus.)
So eta expansion is dynamically ok; see Note [State hack and
bottoming functions], the part about catch#
Example:
f = \x\y. let v = in
\s(one-shot) \t(one-shot). blah
'f' has ArityType [ManyShot,ManyShot,OneShot,OneShot]
The one-shot-ness means we can, in effect, push that
'let' inside the \st.
Suppose f = \xy. x+y
Then f :: AT [False,False] ATop
f v :: AT [False] ATop
f :: AT [] ATop
-------------------- Main arity code ----------------------------
-}
-- See Note [ArityType]
data ArityType = ATop [OneShotInfo] | ABot Arity
-- There is always an explicit lambda
-- to justify the [OneShot], or the Arity
vanillaArityType :: ArityType
vanillaArityType = ATop [] -- Totally uninformative
-- ^ The Arity returned is the number of value args the
-- expression can be applied to without doing much work
exprEtaExpandArity :: DynFlags -> CoreExpr -> Arity
-- exprEtaExpandArity is used when eta expanding
-- e ==> \xy -> e x y
exprEtaExpandArity dflags e
= case (arityType env e) of
ATop oss -> length oss
ABot n -> n
where
env = AE { ae_cheap_fn = mk_cheap_fn dflags isCheapApp
, ae_ped_bot = gopt Opt_PedanticBottoms dflags }
getBotArity :: ArityType -> Maybe Arity
-- Arity of a divergent function
getBotArity (ABot n) = Just n
getBotArity _ = Nothing
mk_cheap_fn :: DynFlags -> CheapAppFun -> CheapFun
mk_cheap_fn dflags cheap_app
| not (gopt Opt_DictsCheap dflags)
= \e _ -> exprIsCheap' cheap_app e
| otherwise
= \e mb_ty -> exprIsCheap' cheap_app e
|| case mb_ty of
Nothing -> False
Just ty -> isDictLikeTy ty
----------------------
findRhsArity :: DynFlags -> Id -> CoreExpr -> Arity -> Arity
-- This implements the fixpoint loop for arity analysis
-- See Note [Arity analysis]
findRhsArity dflags bndr rhs old_arity
= go (rhsEtaExpandArity dflags init_cheap_app rhs)
-- We always call exprEtaExpandArity once, but usually
-- that produces a result equal to old_arity, and then
-- we stop right away (since arities should not decrease)
-- Result: the common case is that there is just one iteration
where
init_cheap_app :: CheapAppFun
init_cheap_app fn n_val_args
| fn == bndr = True -- On the first pass, this binder gets infinite arity
| otherwise = isCheapApp fn n_val_args
go :: Arity -> Arity
go cur_arity
| cur_arity <= old_arity = cur_arity
| new_arity == cur_arity = cur_arity
| otherwise = ASSERT( new_arity < cur_arity )
#ifdef DEBUG
pprTrace "Exciting arity"
(vcat [ ppr bndr <+> ppr cur_arity <+> ppr new_arity
, ppr rhs])
#endif
go new_arity
where
new_arity = rhsEtaExpandArity dflags cheap_app rhs
cheap_app :: CheapAppFun
cheap_app fn n_val_args
| fn == bndr = n_val_args < cur_arity
| otherwise = isCheapApp fn n_val_args
-- ^ The Arity returned is the number of value args the
-- expression can be applied to without doing much work
rhsEtaExpandArity :: DynFlags -> CheapAppFun -> CoreExpr -> Arity
-- exprEtaExpandArity is used when eta expanding
-- e ==> \xy -> e x y
rhsEtaExpandArity dflags cheap_app e
= case (arityType env e) of
ATop (os:oss)
| isOneShotInfo os || has_lam e -> 1 + length oss
-- Don't expand PAPs/thunks
-- Note [Eta expanding thunks]
| otherwise -> 0
ATop [] -> 0
ABot n -> n
where
env = AE { ae_cheap_fn = mk_cheap_fn dflags cheap_app
, ae_ped_bot = gopt Opt_PedanticBottoms dflags }
has_lam (Tick _ e) = has_lam e
has_lam (Lam b e) = isId b || has_lam e
has_lam _ = False
{-
Note [Arity analysis]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The motivating example for arity analysis is this:
f = \x. let g = f (x+1)
in \y. ...g...
What arity does f have? Really it should have arity 2, but a naive
look at the RHS won't see that. You need a fixpoint analysis which
says it has arity "infinity" the first time round.
This example happens a lot; it first showed up in Andy Gill's thesis,
fifteen years ago! It also shows up in the code for 'rnf' on lists
in Trac #4138.
The analysis is easy to achieve because exprEtaExpandArity takes an
argument
type CheapFun = CoreExpr -> Maybe Type -> Bool
used to decide if an expression is cheap enough to push inside a
lambda. And exprIsCheap' in turn takes an argument
type CheapAppFun = Id -> Int -> Bool
which tells when an application is cheap. This makes it easy to
write the analysis loop.
The analysis is cheap-and-cheerful because it doesn't deal with
mutual recursion. But the self-recursive case is the important one.
Note [Eta expanding through dictionaries]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If the experimental -fdicts-cheap flag is on, we eta-expand through
dictionary bindings. This improves arities. Thereby, it also
means that full laziness is less prone to floating out the
application of a function to its dictionary arguments, which
can thereby lose opportunities for fusion. Example:
foo :: Ord a => a -> ...
foo = /\a \(d:Ord a). let d' = ...d... in \(x:a). ....
-- So foo has arity 1
f = \x. foo dInt $ bar x
The (foo DInt) is floated out, and makes ineffective a RULE
foo (bar x) = ...
One could go further and make exprIsCheap reply True to any
dictionary-typed expression, but that's more work.
See Note [Dictionary-like types] in TcType.hs for why we use
isDictLikeTy here rather than isDictTy
Note [Eta expanding thunks]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We don't eta-expand
* Trivial RHSs x = y
* PAPs x = map g
* Thunks f = case y of p -> \x -> blah
When we see
f = case y of p -> \x -> blah
should we eta-expand it? Well, if 'x' is a one-shot state token
then 'yes' because 'f' will only be applied once. But otherwise
we (conservatively) say no. My main reason is to avoid expanding
PAPSs
f = g d ==> f = \x. g d x
because that might in turn make g inline (if it has an inline pragma),
which we might not want. After all, INLINE pragmas say "inline only
when saturated" so we don't want to be too gung-ho about saturating!
-}
arityLam :: Id -> ArityType -> ArityType
arityLam id (ATop as) = ATop (idOneShotInfo id : as)
arityLam _ (ABot n) = ABot (n+1)
floatIn :: Bool -> ArityType -> ArityType
-- We have something like (let x = E in b),
-- where b has the given arity type.
floatIn _ (ABot n) = ABot n
floatIn True (ATop as) = ATop as
floatIn False (ATop as) = ATop (takeWhile isOneShotInfo as)
-- If E is not cheap, keep arity only for one-shots
arityApp :: ArityType -> Bool -> ArityType
-- Processing (fun arg) where at is the ArityType of fun,
-- Knock off an argument and behave like 'let'
arityApp (ABot 0) _ = ABot 0
arityApp (ABot n) _ = ABot (n-1)
arityApp (ATop []) _ = ATop []
arityApp (ATop (_:as)) cheap = floatIn cheap (ATop as)
andArityType :: ArityType -> ArityType -> ArityType -- Used for branches of a 'case'
andArityType (ABot n1) (ABot n2)
= ABot (n1 `min` n2)
andArityType (ATop as) (ABot _) = ATop as
andArityType (ABot _) (ATop bs) = ATop bs
andArityType (ATop as) (ATop bs) = ATop (as `combine` bs)
where -- See Note [Combining case branches]
combine (a:as) (b:bs) = (a `bestOneShot` b) : combine as bs
combine [] bs = takeWhile isOneShotInfo bs
combine as [] = takeWhile isOneShotInfo as
{-
Note [Combining case branches]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider
go = \x. let z = go e0
go2 = \x. case x of
True -> z
False -> \s(one-shot). e1
in go2 x
We *really* want to eta-expand go and go2.
When combining the barnches of the case we have
ATop [] `andAT` ATop [OneShotLam]
and we want to get ATop [OneShotLam]. But if the inner
lambda wasn't one-shot we don't want to do this.
(We need a proper arity analysis to justify that.)
So we combine the best of the two branches, on the (slightly dodgy)
basis that if we know one branch is one-shot, then they all must be.
-}
---------------------------
type CheapFun = CoreExpr -> Maybe Type -> Bool
-- How to decide if an expression is cheap
-- If the Maybe is Just, the type is the type
-- of the expression; Nothing means "don't know"
data ArityEnv
= AE { ae_cheap_fn :: CheapFun
, ae_ped_bot :: Bool -- True <=> be pedantic about bottoms
}
arityType :: ArityEnv -> CoreExpr -> ArityType
arityType env (Cast e co)
= case arityType env e of
ATop os -> ATop (take co_arity os)
ABot n -> ABot (n `min` co_arity)
where
co_arity = length (typeArity (pSnd (coercionKind co)))
-- See Note [exprArity invariant] (2); must be true of
-- arityType too, since that is how we compute the arity
-- of variables, and they in turn affect result of exprArity
-- Trac #5441 is a nice demo
-- However, do make sure that ATop -> ATop and ABot -> ABot!
-- Casts don't affect that part. Getting this wrong provoked #5475
arityType _ (Var v)
| strict_sig <- idStrictness v
, not $ isNopSig strict_sig
, (ds, res) <- splitStrictSig strict_sig
, let arity = length ds
= if isBotRes res then ABot arity
else ATop (take arity one_shots)
| otherwise
= ATop (take (idArity v) one_shots)
where
one_shots :: [OneShotInfo] -- One-shot-ness derived from the type
one_shots = typeArity (idType v)
-- Lambdas; increase arity
arityType env (Lam x e)
| isId x = arityLam x (arityType env e)
| otherwise = arityType env e
-- Applications; decrease arity, except for types
arityType env (App fun (Type _))
= arityType env fun
arityType env (App fun arg )
= arityApp (arityType env fun) (ae_cheap_fn env arg Nothing)
-- Case/Let; keep arity if either the expression is cheap
-- or it's a 1-shot lambda
-- The former is not really right for Haskell
-- f x = case x of { (a,b) -> \y. e }
-- ===>
-- f x y = case x of { (a,b) -> e }
-- The difference is observable using 'seq'
--
arityType env (Case scrut _ _ alts)
| exprIsBottom scrut || null alts
= ABot 0 -- Do not eta expand
-- See Note [Dealing with bottom (1)]
| otherwise
= case alts_type of
ABot n | n>0 -> ATop [] -- Don't eta expand
| otherwise -> ABot 0 -- if RHS is bottomming
-- See Note [Dealing with bottom (2)]
ATop as | not (ae_ped_bot env) -- See Note [Dealing with bottom (3)]
, ae_cheap_fn env scrut Nothing -> ATop as
| exprOkForSpeculation scrut -> ATop as
| otherwise -> ATop (takeWhile isOneShotInfo as)
where
alts_type = foldr1 andArityType [arityType env rhs | (_,_,rhs) <- alts]
arityType env (Let b e)
= floatIn (cheap_bind b) (arityType env e)
where
cheap_bind (NonRec b e) = is_cheap (b,e)
cheap_bind (Rec prs) = all is_cheap prs
is_cheap (b,e) = ae_cheap_fn env e (Just (idType b))
arityType env (Tick t e)
| not (tickishIsCode t) = arityType env e
arityType _ _ = vanillaArityType
{-
%************************************************************************
%* *
The main eta-expander
%* *
%************************************************************************
We go for:
f = \x1..xn -> N ==> f = \x1..xn y1..ym -> N y1..ym
(n >= 0)
where (in both cases)
* The xi can include type variables
* The yi are all value variables
* N is a NORMAL FORM (i.e. no redexes anywhere)
wanting a suitable number of extra args.
The biggest reason for doing this is for cases like
f = \x -> case x of
True -> \y -> e1
False -> \y -> e2
Here we want to get the lambdas together. A good example is the nofib
program fibheaps, which gets 25% more allocation if you don't do this
eta-expansion.
We may have to sandwich some coerces between the lambdas
to make the types work. exprEtaExpandArity looks through coerces
when computing arity; and etaExpand adds the coerces as necessary when
actually computing the expansion.
Note [No crap in eta-expanded code]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The eta expander is careful not to introduce "crap". In particular,
given a CoreExpr satisfying the 'CpeRhs' invariant (in CorePrep), it
returns a CoreExpr satisfying the same invariant. See Note [Eta
expansion and the CorePrep invariants] in CorePrep.
This means the eta-expander has to do a bit of on-the-fly
simplification but it's not too hard. The alernative, of relying on
a subsequent clean-up phase of the Simplifier to de-crapify the result,
means you can't really use it in CorePrep, which is painful.
Note [Eta expansion and SCCs]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Note that SCCs are not treated specially by etaExpand. If we have
etaExpand 2 (\x -> scc "foo" e)
= (\xy -> (scc "foo" e) y)
So the costs of evaluating 'e' (not 'e y') are attributed to "foo"
Note [Eta expansion and source notes]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CorePrep puts floatable ticks outside of value applications, but not
type applications. As a result we might be trying to eta-expand an
expression like
(src<...> v) @a
which we want to lead to code like
\x -> src<...> v @a x
This means that we need to look through type applications and be ready
to re-add floats on the top.
-}
-- | @etaExpand n us e ty@ returns an expression with
-- the same meaning as @e@, but with arity @n@.
--
-- Given:
--
-- > e' = etaExpand n us e ty
--
-- We should have that:
--
-- > ty = exprType e = exprType e'
etaExpand :: Arity -- ^ Result should have this number of value args
-> CoreExpr -- ^ Expression to expand
-> CoreExpr
-- etaExpand deals with for-alls. For example:
-- etaExpand 1 E
-- where E :: forall a. a -> a
-- would return
-- (/\b. \y::a -> E b y)
--
-- It deals with coerces too, though they are now rare
-- so perhaps the extra code isn't worth it
etaExpand n orig_expr
= go n orig_expr
where
-- Strip off existing lambdas and casts
-- Note [Eta expansion and SCCs]
go 0 expr = expr
go n (Lam v body) | isTyVar v = Lam v (go n body)
| otherwise = Lam v (go (n-1) body)
go n (Cast expr co) = Cast (go n expr) co
go n expr
= -- pprTrace "ee" (vcat [ppr orig_expr, ppr expr, ppr etas]) $
retick $ etaInfoAbs etas (etaInfoApp subst' sexpr etas)
where
in_scope = mkInScopeSet (exprFreeVars expr)
(in_scope', etas) = mkEtaWW n orig_expr in_scope (exprType expr)
subst' = mkEmptySubst in_scope'
-- Find ticks behind type apps.
-- See Note [Eta expansion and source notes]
(expr', args) = collectArgs expr
(ticks, expr'') = stripTicksTop tickishFloatable expr'
sexpr = foldl App expr'' args
retick expr = foldr mkTick expr ticks
-- Wrapper Unwrapper
--------------
data EtaInfo = EtaVar Var -- /\a. [], [] a
-- \x. [], [] x
| EtaCo Coercion -- [] |> co, [] |> (sym co)
instance Outputable EtaInfo where
ppr (EtaVar v) = ptext (sLit "EtaVar") <+> ppr v
ppr (EtaCo co) = ptext (sLit "EtaCo") <+> ppr co
pushCoercion :: Coercion -> [EtaInfo] -> [EtaInfo]
pushCoercion co1 (EtaCo co2 : eis)
| isReflCo co = eis
| otherwise = EtaCo co : eis
where
co = co1 `mkTransCo` co2
pushCoercion co eis = EtaCo co : eis
--------------
etaInfoAbs :: [EtaInfo] -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
etaInfoAbs [] expr = expr
etaInfoAbs (EtaVar v : eis) expr = Lam v (etaInfoAbs eis expr)
etaInfoAbs (EtaCo co : eis) expr = Cast (etaInfoAbs eis expr) (mkSymCo co)
--------------
etaInfoApp :: Subst -> CoreExpr -> [EtaInfo] -> CoreExpr
-- (etaInfoApp s e eis) returns something equivalent to
-- ((substExpr s e) `appliedto` eis)
etaInfoApp subst (Lam v1 e) (EtaVar v2 : eis)
= etaInfoApp (CoreSubst.extendSubstWithVar subst v1 v2) e eis
etaInfoApp subst (Cast e co1) eis
= etaInfoApp subst e (pushCoercion co' eis)
where
co' = CoreSubst.substCo subst co1
etaInfoApp subst (Case e b ty alts) eis
= Case (subst_expr subst e) b1 (mk_alts_ty (CoreSubst.substTy subst ty) eis) alts'
where
(subst1, b1) = substBndr subst b
alts' = map subst_alt alts
subst_alt (con, bs, rhs) = (con, bs', etaInfoApp subst2 rhs eis)
where
(subst2,bs') = substBndrs subst1 bs
mk_alts_ty ty [] = ty
mk_alts_ty ty (EtaVar v : eis) = mk_alts_ty (applyTypeToArg ty (varToCoreExpr v)) eis
mk_alts_ty _ (EtaCo co : eis) = mk_alts_ty (pSnd (coercionKind co)) eis
etaInfoApp subst (Let b e) eis
= Let b' (etaInfoApp subst' e eis)
where
(subst', b') = subst_bind subst b
etaInfoApp subst (Tick t e) eis
= Tick (substTickish subst t) (etaInfoApp subst e eis)
etaInfoApp subst e eis
= go (subst_expr subst e) eis
where
go e [] = e
go e (EtaVar v : eis) = go (App e (varToCoreExpr v)) eis
go e (EtaCo co : eis) = go (Cast e co) eis
--------------
mkEtaWW :: Arity -> CoreExpr -> InScopeSet -> Type
-> (InScopeSet, [EtaInfo])
-- EtaInfo contains fresh variables,
-- not free in the incoming CoreExpr
-- Outgoing InScopeSet includes the EtaInfo vars
-- and the original free vars
mkEtaWW orig_n orig_expr in_scope orig_ty
= go orig_n empty_subst orig_ty []
where
empty_subst = mkEmptyTCvSubst in_scope
go n subst ty eis -- See Note [exprArity invariant]
| n == 0
= (getTCvInScope subst, reverse eis)
| Just (bndr,ty') <- splitPiTy_maybe ty
= let ((subst', eta_id'), new_n) = caseBinder bndr
(\tv -> (Type.substTyVarBndr subst tv, n))
(\arg_ty -> (freshEtaVar n subst arg_ty, n-1))
in
-- Avoid free vars of the original expression
go new_n subst' ty' (EtaVar eta_id' : eis)
| Just (co, ty') <- topNormaliseNewType_maybe ty
= -- Given this:
-- newtype T = MkT ([T] -> Int)
-- Consider eta-expanding this
-- eta_expand 1 e T
-- We want to get
-- coerce T (\x::[T] -> (coerce ([T]->Int) e) x)
go n subst ty' (EtaCo co : eis)
| otherwise -- We have an expression of arity > 0,
-- but its type isn't a function.
= WARN( True, (ppr orig_n <+> ppr orig_ty) $$ ppr orig_expr )
(getTCvInScope subst, reverse eis)
-- This *can* legitmately happen:
-- e.g. coerce Int (\x. x) Essentially the programmer is
-- playing fast and loose with types (Happy does this a lot).
-- So we simply decline to eta-expand. Otherwise we'd end up
-- with an explicit lambda having a non-function type
--------------
-- Avoiding unnecessary substitution; use short-cutting versions
subst_expr :: Subst -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
subst_expr = substExprSC (text "CoreArity:substExpr")
subst_bind :: Subst -> CoreBind -> (Subst, CoreBind)
subst_bind = substBindSC
--------------
freshEtaVar :: Int -> TCvSubst -> Type -> (TCvSubst, Var)
-- Make a fresh Id, with specified type (after applying substitution)
-- It should be "fresh" in the sense that it's not in the in-scope set
-- of the TvSubstEnv; and it should itself then be added to the in-scope
-- set of the TvSubstEnv
--
-- The Int is just a reasonable starting point for generating a unique;
-- it does not necessarily have to be unique itself.
freshEtaVar n subst ty
= (subst', eta_id')
where
ty' = Type.substTy subst ty
eta_id' = uniqAway (getTCvInScope subst) $
mkSysLocalOrCoVar (fsLit "eta") (mkBuiltinUnique n) ty'
subst' = extendTCvInScope subst eta_id'