-
Ryan Scott authored
We have one for `(:~:)`, but not for `(:~~:)`! Let's fix this oversight. Reviewers: bgamari, austin, hvr Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3657
ee923252
We have one for `(:~:)`, but not for `(:~~:)`! Let's fix this oversight. Reviewers: bgamari, austin, hvr Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3657