@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ You need to use `-ddump-prep` or `-ddump-stg` when compiling the source files to
It's very low level stuff, but in exchange:
- It's guaranteed that adding `-ticky` doesn't affect optimisation or transformation. It just adds the overhead of performance counters to the final code. (Any change these affect the CMM optimisations?)
- It's guaranteed that adding `-ticky` doesn't affect optimisation or transformation. It just adds the overhead of performance counters to the final code. (Any chance these affect the Cmm optimisations?)
- You can mix modules compiled with `-ticky` and modules compiled without.
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Ticky-ticky profiling adds counters to every STG function. It's very low-level,
You need to use `-ddump-prep` or `-ddump-stg` when compiling the source files to see the functions that correspond to the performance counter report.
It's very low level stuff, but in exchange:
* It's guaranteed that adding `-ticky` doesn't affect optimisation or transformation. It just adds the overhead of performance counters to the final code. (Any change these affect the CMM optimisations?)
* It's guaranteed that adding `-ticky` doesn't affect optimisation or transformation. It just adds the overhead of performance counters to the final code. (Any chance these affect the Cmm optimisations?)
* You can mix modules compiled with `-ticky` and modules compiled without.