-
Previously we were missing `Typeable` representations for several wired-in types (and their promoted constructors). These include, * `Nat` * `Symbol` * `':` * `'[]` Moreover, some constructors were incorrectly identified as being defined in `GHC.Types` whereas they were in fact defined in `GHC.Prim`. Ultimately this is just a temporary band-aid as there is general agreement that we should eliminate the manual definition of these representations entirely. Test Plan: Validate Reviewers: austin, hvr Subscribers: thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1769 GHC Trac Issues: #11120
ac3cf68c