Commit 01c01d62 authored by simonpj's avatar simonpj
Browse files

Track error message changes

parent f793789d
......@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ T2851.hs:9:14:
No instance for (Show (F a))
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at T2851.hs:9:14-17
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Show (F a))
Alternative fix: use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Show (F a))
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Show (D a))
......@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ drvfail001.hs:16:18:
No instance for (Show (f (f a)))
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at drvfail001.hs:16:18-21
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Show (f (f a)))
Alternative fix: use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration
instead, so you can specify the instance context yourself
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Show (f (f a)))
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Show (SM f a))
......@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ drvfail003.hs:16:55:
No instance for (Show (v (v a)))
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at drvfail003.hs:16:55-58
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Show (v (v a)))
Alternative fix: use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration
instead, so you can specify the instance context yourself
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Show (v (v a)))
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Show (Square_ v w a))
......@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ drvfail004.hs:8:11:
No instance for (Eq (Foo a b))
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at drvfail004.hs:8:11-13
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Eq (Foo a b))
Alternative fix: use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration
instead, so you can specify the instance context yourself
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Eq (Foo a b))
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Ord (Foo a b))
......@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ drvfail007.hs:4:37:
No instance for (Eq (Int -> Int))
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at drvfail007.hs:4:37-38
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Eq (Int -> Int))
Alternative fix: use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration
instead, so you can specify the instance context yourself
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Eq (Int -> Int))
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Eq Foo)
......@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ drvfail012.hs:5:32:
No instance for (Eq (Ego a))
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at drvfail012.hs:5:32-34
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Eq (Ego a))
Alternative fix: use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration
instead, so you can specify the instance context yourself
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Eq (Ego a))
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Ord (Ego a))
......@@ -3,16 +3,18 @@ drvfail013.hs:4:69:
No instance for (Eq (m (Maybe a)))
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at drvfail013.hs:4:69-70
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Eq (m (Maybe a)))
Alternative fix: use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration
instead, so you can specify the instance context yourself
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Eq (m (Maybe a)))
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Eq (MaybeT m a))
drvfail013.hs:6:69:
No instance for (Eq (m (Maybe a)))
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at drvfail013.hs:6:69-70
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Eq (m (Maybe a)))
Alternative fix: use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration
instead, so you can specify the instance context yourself
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Eq (m (Maybe a)))
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Eq (MaybeT' m a))
......@@ -3,5 +3,8 @@ mod54.hs:3:21:
No instance for (Eq T)
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at mod54.hs:3:21-23
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Eq T)
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Eq T)
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Ord T)
......@@ -3,12 +3,18 @@ tcfail046.hs:9:47:
No instance for (Eq (Process a))
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at tcfail046.hs:9:47-48
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Eq (Process a))
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Eq (Process a))
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Eq (Continuation a))
tcfail046.hs:21:12:
No instance for (Eq (Process a))
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at tcfail046.hs:21:12-13
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Eq (Process a))
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Eq (Process a))
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Eq (Message a))
......@@ -3,5 +3,8 @@ tcfail169.hs:7:50:
No instance for (Show (Succ a))
arising from the 'deriving' clause of a data type declaration
at tcfail169.hs:7:50-53
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Show (Succ a))
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Show (Succ a))
or use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration instead,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
When deriving the instance for (Show (Seq a))
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment