Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
/
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
Menu
Open sidebar
Glasgow Haskell Compiler
GHC
Commits
1363ab44
Commit
1363ab44
authored
Sep 17, 2010
by
simonpj
Browse files
Accept error message changes
parent
168b8f12
Changes
20
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/annotations/should_fail/annfail08.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
...
...
@@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ annfail08.hs:9:1:
In the expression: (id + 1)
In the annotation: {-# ANN f (id + 1) #-}
annfail08.hs:9:1
7
:
annfail08.hs:9:1
5
:
No instance for (Num (a -> a))
arising from
the literal
`
1
'
arising from
a use of
`
+
'
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num (a -> a))
In the second argument of `(+)', namely `1'
In the expression: (id + 1)
In the annotation: {-# ANN f (id + 1) #-}
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_fail/NoMatchErr.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
...
...
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
NoMatchErr.hs:20:5:
Could not deduce (Memo d ~ Memo d1) from the context (Fun d1)
NB: `Memo' is a type function, and may not be injective
Expected type: Memo d1 a
Actual type: Memo d a
In the first argument of `(.)', namely `abst'
In the expression: abst . appl
In an equation for `f': f = abst . appl
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_fail/T1900.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
T1900.hs:11:1
3
:
T1900.hs:11:1
2
:
No instance for (Num ())
arising from
the literal
`
1
'
arising from
a use of
`
+
'
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num ())
In the second argument of `(+)', namely `1'
In the expression: (+ 1)
In an equation for `trans': trans = (+ 1)
In the instance declaration for `Bug Int'
T1900.hs:14:16:
Could not deduce (Depend s ~ Depend s1) from the context (Bug s1)
...
...
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_fail/T2693.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
T2693.hs:10:15:
Couldn't match type `TFn a' with `(a1, b)'
Expected type: (a1, b1)
Actual type: TFn a
In the first argument of `fst', namely `x'
In the first argument of `(+)', namely `fst x'
In the expression: fst x + fst x
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_fail/T3330c.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
...
...
@@ -37,15 +37,15 @@ T3330c.hs:22:45:
Actual type: R f1
In the first argument of `plug', namely `rf'
In the first argument of `Inl', namely `(plug rf df x)'
In the expression: Inl (plug rf df x)
T3330c.hs:22:45:
Couldn't match type `f' with `f1 x'
`f' is a rigid type variable bound by
a pattern with constructor
RSum :: forall (f :: * -> *) (g :: * -> *).
R f -> R g -> R (f :+: g)
at T3330c.hs:22:10
Expected type: Der ((->) x) (f1 x)
Actual type: R f
Couldn't match type `f1' with `f x'
`f1' is a rigid type variable bound by
a pattern with constructor
RSum :: forall (f :: * -> *) (g :: * -> *).
R f -> R g -> R (f :+: g)
at T3330c.hs:22:10
In the first argument of `plug', namely `rf'
In the first argument of `Inl', namely `(plug rf df x)'
In the expression: Inl (plug rf df x)
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_fail/T4093b.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
T4093b.hs:25:21:
Could not deduce (EitherCO
x (EitherCO e (A C C n) (A O C n)) (A C O n)
~
(MaybeC e (n C O), MaybeC x (n O C)))
from the context (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n) ~ A e O n,
EitherCO x (A C C n) (A C O n) ~ A C x n)
In the expression: foldBlockNodesF (f, l) b z
In an equation for `blockToNodeList':
blockToNodeList b
= foldBlockNodesF (f, l) b z
where
z ::
EitherCO e (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n)) (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n))
z = undefined
f ::
n C O
-> EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n) -> EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n)
f n _ = (JustC n, NothingC)
....
T4093b.hs:31:13:
Couldn't match type `e' with `C'
`e' is a rigid type variable bound by
the type signature for `blockToNodeList' at T4093b.hs:20:12
In the expression: (JustC n, NothingC)
In an equation for `f': f n _ = (JustC n, NothingC)
In an equation for `blockToNodeList':
blockToNodeList b
= foldBlockNodesF (f, l) b z
where
z ::
EitherCO e (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n)) (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n))
z = undefined
f ::
n C O
-> EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n) -> EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n)
f n _ = (JustC n, NothingC)
....
T4093b.hs:25:21:
Could not deduce (EitherCO
x (EitherCO e (A C C n) (A O C n)) (A C O n)
~
(MaybeC e (n C O), MaybeC x (n O C)))
from the context (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n) ~ A e O n,
EitherCO x (A C C n) (A C O n) ~ A C x n)
Expected type: (MaybeC e (n C O), MaybeC x (n O C))
Actual type: EitherCO
x (EitherCO e (A C C n) (A O C n)) (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n))
In the expression: foldBlockNodesF (f, l) b z
In an equation for `blockToNodeList':
blockToNodeList b
= foldBlockNodesF (f, l) b z
where
z ::
EitherCO e (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n)) (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n))
z = undefined
f ::
n C O
-> EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n) -> EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n)
f n _ = (JustC n, NothingC)
....
T4093b.hs:31:13:
Couldn't match type `e' with `C'
`e' is a rigid type variable bound by
the type signature for `blockToNodeList' at T4093b.hs:20:12
In the expression: (JustC n, NothingC)
In an equation for `f': f n _ = (JustC n, NothingC)
In an equation for `blockToNodeList':
blockToNodeList b
= foldBlockNodesF (f, l) b z
where
z ::
EitherCO e (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n)) (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n))
z = undefined
f ::
n C O
-> EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n) -> EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n)
f n _ = (JustC n, NothingC)
....
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_fail/T4272.hs
View file @
1363ab44
...
...
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ prune :: TermLike a => TermFamily a a -> TermFamily a a -> b
prune
=
undefined
-- terms :: Family f => f a -> a
-- terms :: TermFamily a a -> a
-- Instantiate with f = TermFamily a
-- terms :: Family (TermFamily a) => TermFamily a a -> a
-- (terms (undefined::TermFamily a a) :: Family (TermFamily a) => a
-- So the call to prune forces the equality
-- TermFamily a a ~ a
...
...
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_fail/T4272.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
...
...
@@ -2,8 +2,10 @@
T4272.hs:11:26:
Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type:
a = TermFamily a a
Expected type: TermFamily a (TermFamily a a)
Actual type: TermFamily a a
In the first argument of `terms', namely
`(undefined :: TermFamily a a)'
`(undefined :: TermFamily a a)'
In the second argument of `prune', namely
`(terms (undefined :: TermFamily a a))'
`(terms (undefined :: TermFamily a a))'
In the expression: prune t (terms (undefined :: TermFamily a a))
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_fail/all.T
View file @
1363ab44
...
...
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ test('T4272', normal, compile_fail, [''])
test
('
T4246
',
normal
,
compile_fail
,
[''])
test
('
T4093a
',
normal
,
compile_fail
,
[''])
test
('
T4093b
',
normal
,
compile_fail
,
[''])
test
('
T3330a
',
normal
,
compile_fail
,
[''])
test
('
T3330a
',
reqlib
('
mtl
')
,
compile_fail
,
[''])
test
('
T3330b
',
normal
,
compile_fail
,
[''])
test
('
T3330c
',
normal
,
compile_fail
,
[''])
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/mdo/should_fail/mdofail001.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
mdofail001.hs:10:3
6
:
mdofail001.hs:10:3
2
:
No instance for (Num Char)
arising from the literal `
3
'
arising from the literal `
1
'
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num Char)
In the expression:
3
In the expression:
1
In the first argument of `l', namely `[1, 2, 3]'
In the expression: l [1, 2, 3]
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_compile/FD3.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
FD3.hs:15:15:
Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: a = (String, a)
Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type:
a = (String, a)
arising from a use of `mkA'
In the expression: mkA a
In an equation for `translate': translate a = mkA a
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail006.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
tcfail006.hs:
5
:2
0
:
tcfail006.hs:
4
:2
4
:
No instance for (Num Bool)
arising from the literal `1'
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num Bool)
In the expression: 1
In the expression: (
1,
True)
In a case alternative:
Fals
e -> (
1,
True)
In the expression: (True
, 1
)
In a case alternative:
Tru
e -> (True
, 1
)
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail007.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
tcfail007.hs:3:1
6
:
tcfail007.hs:3:1
5
:
No instance for (Num Bool)
arising from
the literal
`
1
'
arising from
a use of
`
+
'
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num Bool)
In the second argument of `(+)', namely `1'
In the expression: x + 1
In an equation for `n':
n x | True = x + 1
| False = True
n x
| True = x + 1
| False = True
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail010.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
tcfail010.hs:3:1
8
:
tcfail010.hs:3:1
7
:
No instance for (Num [t])
arising from
the literal
`
2
'
arising from
a use of
`
+
'
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num [t])
In the second argument of `(+)', namely `2'
In the expression: z + 2
In the expression: \ (y : z) -> z + 2
In an equation for `q': q = \ (y : z) -> z + 2
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail015.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
tcfail015.hs:
9:39
:
tcfail015.hs:
7:13
:
No instance for (Num Bool)
arising from the literal `
4
'
arising from the literal `
2
'
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num Bool)
In the expression: 4
In an equation for `g':
g (ANode b (ANode c d))
| b = c + 1
| otherwise = 4
In the expression: 2
In an equation for `g': g (ANull) = 2
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail040.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
tcfail040.hs:19:
14
:
tcfail040.hs:19:
5
:
Ambiguous type variable `a' in the constraint:
(ORD a) arising from a use of `<<'
Probable fix: add a type signature that fixes these type variable(s)
In the
second
argument of `(===)', namely `(<<)'
In the
first
argument of `(===)', namely `(<<)'
In the expression: (<<) === (<<)
In an equation for `f': f = (<<) === (<<)
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail102.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
tcfail102.hs:8:
7
:
tcfail102.hs:8:
15
:
Could not deduce (Integral (Ratio a)) from the context (Integral a)
arising from a
record update
arising from a
use of `p'
Possible fix:
add (Integral (Ratio a)) to the context of
the type signature for `f'
or add an instance declaration for (Integral (Ratio a))
In the `p' field of a record
In the expression: x {p = p x}
In an equation for `f': f x = x {p = p x}
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail122.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
...
...
@@ -3,11 +3,28 @@ tcfail122.hs:8:9:
Kind incompatibility when matching types:
c :: (* -> *) -> *
a :: * -> *
Expected type: a b
Actual type: c d
In the expression:
undefined :: forall c :: ((* -> *) -> *) d :: (* -> *). c d
undefined :: forall c :: ((* -> *) -> *) d :: (* -> *). c d
In the expression:
[undefined :: forall a b. a b,
undefined :: forall c :: ((* -> *) -> *) d :: (* -> *). c d]
[undefined :: forall a b. a b,
undefined :: forall c :: ((* -> *) -> *) d :: (* -> *). c d]
In an equation for `foo':
foo = [undefined :: forall a b. a b,
undefined :: forall c :: ((* -> *) -> *) d :: (* -> *). c d]
foo
= [undefined :: forall a b. a b,
undefined :: forall c :: ((* -> *) -> *) d :: (* -> *). c d]
tcfail122.hs:8:9:
Kind incompatibility when matching types:
d :: * -> *
b :: *
In the expression:
undefined :: forall c :: ((* -> *) -> *) d :: (* -> *). c d
In the expression:
[undefined :: forall a b. a b,
undefined :: forall c :: ((* -> *) -> *) d :: (* -> *). c d]
In an equation for `foo':
foo
= [undefined :: forall a b. a b,
undefined :: forall c :: ((* -> *) -> *) d :: (* -> *). c d]
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail123.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
...
...
@@ -6,3 +6,11 @@ tcfail123.hs:11:10:
In the first argument of `f', namely `3#'
In the expression: f 3#
In the expression: (f 3#, f 4.3#, f True)
tcfail123.hs:11:16:
Kind incompatibility when matching types:
t :: *
GHC.Prim.Float# :: #
In the first argument of `f', namely `4.3#'
In the expression: f 4.3#
In the expression: (f 3#, f 4.3#, f True)
testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail143.stderr
View file @
1363ab44
tcfail143.hs:28:9:
Couldn't match type `S Z' with `Z'
arising from a use of `extend'
In the expression: n1 `extend` n0
In an equation for `t2': t2 = n1 `extend` n0
Write
Preview
Supports
Markdown
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment