Commit 38edeea9 authored by Ömer Sinan Ağacan's avatar Ömer Sinan Ağacan Committed by Ben Gamari

Mark SRT_1/SRT_2 as CONSTR_1_0/CONSTR_2_0

Test Plan:
Validated locally, but skipped perf tests as there's a
framework-related error

Reviewers: simonmar, bgamari, erikd

Reviewed By: simonmar

Subscribers: rwbarton, carter

Differential Revision:
parent 665f8b0c
......@@ -512,10 +512,10 @@ CLOSURE(stg_NO_TREC_closure,stg_NO_TREC);
See Note [SRTs] in compiler/cmm/CmmBuildInfoTable.hs
------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
INFO_TABLE_CONSTR(stg_SRT_1, 1, 0, 0, CONSTR, "SRT_1", "SRT_1")
INFO_TABLE_CONSTR(stg_SRT_1, 1, 0, 0, CONSTR_1_0, "SRT_1", "SRT_1")
{ foreign "C" barf("SRT_1 object (%p) entered!", R1) never returns; }
INFO_TABLE_CONSTR(stg_SRT_2, 2, 0, 0, CONSTR, "SRT_2", "SRT_2")
INFO_TABLE_CONSTR(stg_SRT_2, 2, 0, 0, CONSTR_2_0, "SRT_2", "SRT_2")
{ foreign "C" barf("SRT_2 object (%p) entered!", R1) never returns; }
INFO_TABLE_CONSTR(stg_SRT_3, 3, 0, 0, CONSTR, "SRT_3", "SRT_3")
Markdown is supported
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment