Commit 7d7809de authored by Simon Marlow's avatar Simon Marlow

Refer to Control.Concurrent instead of GHC.Conc

Modified version of a patch by shelarcy <shelarcy@gmail.com>
parent f283c391
......@@ -2114,7 +2114,7 @@ f "2" = 2
<para>There are two ways to run a program on multiple
processors:
call <literal>GHC.Conc.setNumCapabilities</literal> from your
call <literal>Control.Concurrent.setNumCapabilities</literal> from your
program, or use the RTS <option>-N</option> option.</para>
<variablelist>
......@@ -2150,13 +2150,13 @@ f "2" = 2
<para>The current value of the <option>-N</option> option
is available to the Haskell program
via <literal>GHC.Conc.getNumCapabilities</literal>, and
via <literal>Control.Concurrent.getNumCapabilities</literal>, and
it may be changed while the program is running by
calling <literal>GHC.Conc.setNumCapabilities</literal>.
calling <literal>Control.Concurrent.setNumCapabilities</literal>.
Note: in the current implementation,
the <option>-N</option> value may only
be <emphasis>increased</emphasis>, not decreased, by
calling <literal>GHC.Conc.setNumCapabilities</literal>.</para>
calling <literal>Control.Concurrent.setNumCapabilities</literal>.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
......@@ -2192,7 +2192,7 @@ f "2" = 2
<para>
This option is probably only of use for concurrent
programs that explicitly schedule threads onto CPUs
with <literal>GHC.Conc.forkOnIO</literal>.
with <literal>Control.Concurrent.forkOn</literal>.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment