[project @ 2001-06-22 09:04:29 by sewardj]

Updated expected output for typechecker failure tests.

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/NOTES

@@ -8,4 +8,6 @@ typecheck/should_compile tc056,tc115,tc116: stderr not checked
 typecheck/should_fail
    Data82.hs Digraph.hs Digraph.stderr Inst82_1.hs Inst82_2.hs   
    have not been assimilated.
+   (are needed by tcfail082 but am not sure how to do multi-module
+    tests yet)
 

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail001.stderr

 
-tcfail001.hs:8:
-    Warning: Duplicate class assertion `A a' in the context:
-		 (A a, A a) => ...
-
-tcfail001.hs:9:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail001.hs:9:
     Couldn't match `[a]' against `t -> t1'
 	Expected type: [a]
 	Inferred type: t -> t1
-    In an equation for function `op': op [] = []
+    In the definition of `op': op [] = []
     In the definition for method `op'

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail002.stderr

 
-tcfail002.hs:4:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail002.hs:4:
     Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: t = [t]
 	Expected type: t
 	Inferred type: [t]
-    in the definition of function `c': z
+    In the definition of `c': z

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail006.stderr

 
-tcfail006.hs:5:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail006.hs:5:
     No instance for `Num Bool'
-    arising from the literal `1' at tcfail006.hs:5
-    in a group of case alternatives beginning: (1, True)
+    arising from the literal `1' at tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail006.hs:5
+    In a case alternative: (1, True)

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail007.stderr

 
-tcfail007.hs:3:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail007.hs:3:
     No instance for `Num Bool'
-    arising from the literal `1' at tcfail007.hs:3
+    arising from the literal `1' at tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail007.hs:3
     In the second argument of `(+)', namely `1'
-    in the definition of function `n': x + 1
+    In the definition of `n': x + 1

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail008.stderr

 
-tcfail008.hs:3:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail008.hs:3:
     No instance for `Num [t]'
-    arising from the literal `2' at tcfail008.hs:3
+    arising from the literal `2' at tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail008.hs:3
     In the second argument of `(:)', namely `2'
-    in the definition of function `o': 1 : 2
+    In the definition of `o': 1 : 2
 
-tcfail008.hs:3:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail008.hs:3:
     Ambiguous type variable(s) `t' in the constraint `Num t'
-    arising from the literal `1' at tcfail008.hs:3
+    arising from the literal `1' at tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail008.hs:3
     In the first argument of `(:)', namely `1'
-    in the definition of function `o': 1 : 2
+    In the definition of `o': 1 : 2

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail009.stderr

 
-tcfail009.hs:3:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail009.hs:3:
     Couldn't match `Integer' against `Int'
 	Expected type: Integer
 	Inferred type: Int
     In an expression with a type signature: 2 :: Integer
+    In an arithmetic sequence: [(1 :: Int) .. (2 :: Integer)]

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail011.stderr

 
-tcfail011.hs:3: Variable not in scope: `y'
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail011.hs:3:
+    Variable not in scope: `y'

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail013.stderr

 
-tcfail013.hs:4:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail013.hs:4:
     Couldn't match `[t]' against `Bool'
 	Expected type: [t]
 	Inferred type: Bool
     In the pattern: True
-    In an equation for function `f': f True = 2
+    In the definition of `f': f True = 2

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail014.stderr

 
-tcfail014.hs:5:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail014.hs:5:
     Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: t = t -> t1
 	Expected type: t
 	Inferred type: t -> t1
     In the first argument of `z', namely `z'
-    in the definition of function `h': z z
+    In the definition of `h': z z

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail015.stderr

 
-tcfail015.hs:9:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail015.hs:9:
     No instance for `Num Bool'
-    arising from the literal `4' at tcfail015.hs:9
-    in the definition of function `g': 4
+    arising from the literal `4' at tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail015.hs:9
+    In the definition of `g': 4

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail017.stderr

 
-tcfail017.hs:10:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail017.hs:10:
     Could not deduce `C [a]' from the context (B a)
     Probable fix:
 	Add `C [a]' to the instance declaration context
 	Or add an instance declaration for `C [a]'
-    arising from an instance declaration at tcfail017.hs:10
+    arising from the instance declaration at tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail017.hs:10
+    In the instance declaration for `B [a]'

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail018.stderr

 
-tcfail018.hs:5:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail018.hs:5:
     No instance for `Num [t]'
-    arising from the literal `1' at tcfail018.hs:5
-    in a pattern binding: 1
+    arising from the literal `1' at tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail018.hs:5
+    In a pattern binding: 1

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail020.stderr

 
-tcfail020.hs:10:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail020.hs:10:
     Could not deduce `A [a]' from the context (A a)
     Probable fix:
 	Add `A [a]' to the instance declaration context
 	Or add an instance declaration for `A [a]'
-    arising from an instance declaration at tcfail020.hs:10
+    arising from the instance declaration at tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail020.hs:10
+    In the instance declaration for `B [a]'

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail029.stderr

 
-tcfail029.hs:6:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail029.hs:6:
     No instance for `Ord Foo'
-    arising from use of `>' at tcfail029.hs:6
-    in the definition of function `f': x > Bar
+    arising from use of `>' at tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail029.hs:6
+    In the definition of `f': x > Bar

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail030.stderr

 
-tcfail030.hs:3: Variable not in scope: `main'
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail030.hs:3:
+    Variable not in scope: `main'

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail031.stderr

 
-tcfail031.hs:3:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail031.hs:3:
     Couldn't match `Bool' against `Char'
 	Expected type: Bool
 	Inferred type: Char
     In the predicate expression: 'a'
-    in the definition of function `f': if 'a' then 1 else 2
+    In the definition of `f': if 'a' then 1 else 2

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail032.stderr

 
-tcfail032.hs:14:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail032.hs:14:
     Inferred type is less polymorphic than expected
 	Quantified type variable `a' escapes
 	It is mentioned in the environment
@@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ tcfail032.hs:14:
     When checking an expression type signature
     In an expression with a type signature:
 	  x :: forall a. (Eq a) => a -> Int
+    In the definition of `f': (x :: forall a. (Eq a) => a -> Int)

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail034.stderr

 
-tcfail034.hs:17:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail034.hs:17:
     Could not deduce `Integral a' from the context (Num a, Eq a)
     Probable fix:
-	Add `Integral a' to the type signature(s) for {test}
-    arising from use of `mod' at tcfail034.hs:17
+	Add `Integral a' to the type signature(s) for test
+    arising from use of `mod' at tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail034.hs:17
     In the first argument of `(==)', namely `(x `mod` 3)'
-    in the definition of function `test': (x `mod` 3) == 0
+    In the definition of `test': (x `mod` 3) == 0

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail040.stderr

 
-tcfail040.hs:19:
+tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail040.hs:19:
     Ambiguous type variable(s) `a' in the constraint `ORD a'
-    arising from use of `<<' at tcfail040.hs:19
+    arising from use of `<<' at tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail040.hs:19
     In the second argument of `(===)', namely `(<<)'
-    in the definition of function `f': (<<) === (<<)
+    In the definition of `f': (<<) === (<<)