This test now compiles without errors

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/rename/prog006/Makefile

@@ -2,16 +2,21 @@ TOP=../../../..
 include $(TOP)/mk/boilerplate.mk
 include $(TOP)/mk/test.mk
 
+# Original comments relating to GHC 6.4:
 # This test caused a panic in GHC 6.4, but in reality it is user
 # error, caused by compiling separate modules in the program using
 # different search paths.  GHC gets confused when it can't find a
 # module mentioned as a dependency in another interface file.
 
+# Update for GHC 6.6:
+# This test now succeeds, because A.hi records the fact that B.C
+# came from the package test-1.0, so there's no conflict.
+
 # If the package format changes, we might have to re-generate pkg.conf
 # using the supplied Cabal configuration.
 
 rn.prog006:
-	@$(TEST_HC) --make B.C -no-recomp -v0
+	@$(TEST_HC) --make -package-name test-1.0 B.C -no-recomp -v0
 	@sed "s@__IMPORT__@`pwd`@" <pkg.conf.in >pkg.conf
 	@$(TEST_HC) -c -package-conf pkg.conf -package test -no-recomp A.hs -i
 	-@$(TEST_HC) -c -package-conf pkg.conf -package test -no-recomp Main.hs

testsuite/tests/ghc-regress/rename/prog006/rn.prog006.stderr

-A.hi:
-  Interface file inconsistency:
-    home-package module `B.C' is mentioned,
-    but does not appear in the dependencies of the interface
-Cannot continue after interface file error