1. 21 Jul, 2010 1 commit
  2. 13 Jul, 2010 1 commit
  3. 07 Jul, 2010 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Fix Trac #4127 (and hence #4173) · f87cc9cf
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      The change involves a little refactoring, so that the default
      method Ids are brought into scope earlier, before the value
      declarations are compiled.  (Since a value decl may contain
      an instance decl in a quote.)
      
      See Note [Default method Ids and Template Haskell] in
      TcTyClsDcls.
      f87cc9cf
  4. 31 May, 2010 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Robustify the treatement of DFunUnfolding · a90dc390
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      See Note [DFun unfoldings] in CoreSyn.  The issue here is that 
      you can't tell how many dictionary arguments a DFun needs just
      from looking at the Arity of the DFun Id: if the dictionary is
      represented by a newtype the arity might include the dictionary
      and value arguments of the (single) method.
      
      So we need to record the number of arguments need by the DFun
      in the DFunUnfolding itself.  Details in 
         Note [DFun unfoldings] in CoreSyn
      a90dc390
  5. 25 May, 2010 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Refactor (again) the handling of default methods · 78693246
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      This patch fixes Trac #4056, by 
      
       a) tidying up the treatment of default method names
       b) removing the 'module' argument to newTopSrcBinder
      
      The details aren't that interesting, but the result
      is much tidier. The original bug was a 'nameModule' panic,
      caused by trying to find the module of a top-level name.
      But TH quotes generate Internal top-level names that don't
      have a module, and that is generally a good thing.  
      
      Fixing that in turn led to the default-method refactoring,
      which also makes the Name for a default method be handled
      in the same way as other derived names, generated in BuildTyCl
      via a call newImplicitBinder.  Hurrah.
      78693246
  6. 09 Mar, 2010 1 commit
  7. 07 Jan, 2010 1 commit
  8. 06 Jan, 2010 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Improve the handling of default methods · 77166b17
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      See the long Note [INLINE and default methods].  
      
      This patch changes a couple of data types, with a knock-on effect on
      the format of interface files.  A lot of files get touched, but is a
      relatively minor change.  The main tiresome bit is the extra plumbing
      to communicate default methods between the type checker and the
      desugarer.
      77166b17
  9. 05 Jan, 2010 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Undo the fix for Trac #3772 and do it a new way · 9a4c93a5
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      The main idea is that I'm now treating a single-method dictionary very
      much like a multi-method dictionary.  In particular, it respond to
      exprIsConApp_maybe, even though newtypes aren't *really* proper
      constructors.
      
      See long comments with Note [Single-method classes] for why
      this slight hack is justified.
      9a4c93a5
  10. 21 Dec, 2009 1 commit
  11. 18 Dec, 2009 2 commits
  12. 13 Nov, 2009 1 commit
  13. 12 Nov, 2009 1 commit
  14. 06 Nov, 2009 1 commit
  15. 29 Oct, 2009 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      The Big INLINE Patch: totally reorganise way that INLINE pragmas work · 72462499
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      This patch has been a long time in gestation and has, as a
      result, accumulated some extra bits and bobs that are only
      loosely related.  I separated the bits that are easy to split
      off, but the rest comes as one big patch, I'm afraid.
      
      Note that:
       * It comes together with a patch to the 'base' library
       * Interface file formats change slightly, so you need to
         recompile all libraries
      
      The patch is mainly giant tidy-up, driven in part by the
      particular stresses of the Data Parallel Haskell project. I don't
      expect a big performance win for random programs.  Still, here are the
      nofib results, relative to the state of affairs without the patch
      
              Program           Size    Allocs   Runtime   Elapsed
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Min         -12.7%    -14.5%    -17.5%    -17.8%
                  Max          +4.7%    +10.9%     +9.1%     +8.4%
       Geometric Mean          +0.9%     -0.1%     -5.6%     -7.3%
      
      The +10.9% allocation outlier is rewrite, which happens to have a
      very delicate optimisation opportunity involving an interaction
      of CSE and inlining (see nofib/Simon-nofib-notes). The fact that
      the 'before' case found the optimisation is somewhat accidental.
      Runtimes seem to go down, but I never kno wwhether to really trust
      this number.  Binary sizes wobble a bit, but nothing drastic.
      
      
      The Main Ideas are as follows.
      
      InlineRules
      ~~~~~~~~~~~
      When you say 
            {-# INLINE f #-}
            f x = <rhs>
      you intend that calls (f e) are replaced by <rhs>[e/x] So we
      should capture (\x.<rhs>) in the Unfolding of 'f', and never meddle
      with it.  Meanwhile, we can optimise <rhs> to our heart's content,
      leaving the original unfolding intact in Unfolding of 'f'.
      
      So the representation of an Unfolding has changed quite a bit
      (see CoreSyn).  An INLINE pragma gives rise to an InlineRule 
      unfolding.  
      
      Moreover, it's only used when 'f' is applied to the
      specified number of arguments; that is, the number of argument on 
      the LHS of the '=' sign in the original source definition. 
      For example, (.) is now defined in the libraries like this
         {-# INLINE (.) #-}
         (.) f g = \x -> f (g x)
      so that it'll inline when applied to two arguments. If 'x' appeared
      on the left, thus
         (.) f g x = f (g x)
      it'd only inline when applied to three arguments.  This slightly-experimental
      change was requested by Roman, but it seems to make sense.
      
      Other associated changes
      
      * Moving the deck chairs in DsBinds, which processes the INLINE pragmas
      
      * In the old system an INLINE pragma made the RHS look like
         (Note InlineMe <rhs>)
        The Note switched off optimisation in <rhs>.  But it was quite
        fragile in corner cases. The new system is more robust, I believe.
        In any case, the InlineMe note has disappeared 
      
      * The workerInfo of an Id has also been combined into its Unfolding,
        so it's no longer a separate field of the IdInfo.
      
      * Many changes in CoreUnfold, esp in callSiteInline, which is the critical
        function that decides which function to inline.  Lots of comments added!
      
      * exprIsConApp_maybe has moved to CoreUnfold, since it's so strongly
        associated with "does this expression unfold to a constructor application".
        It can now do some limited beta reduction too, which Roman found 
        was an important.
      
      Instance declarations
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      It's always been tricky to get the dfuns generated from instance
      declarations to work out well.  This is particularly important in 
      the Data Parallel Haskell project, and I'm now on my fourth attempt,
      more or less.
      
      There is a detailed description in TcInstDcls, particularly in
      Note [How instance declarations are translated].   Roughly speaking
      we now generate a top-level helper function for every method definition
      in an instance declaration, so that the dfun takes a particularly
      stylised form:
        dfun a d1 d2 = MkD (op1 a d1 d2) (op2 a d1 d2) ...etc...
      
      In fact, it's *so* stylised that we never need to unfold a dfun.
      Instead ClassOps have a special rewrite rule that allows us to
      short-cut dictionary selection.  Suppose dfun :: Ord a -> Ord [a]
                                                  d :: Ord a
      Then   
          compare (dfun a d)  -->   compare_list a d 
      in one rewrite, without first inlining the 'compare' selector
      and the body of the dfun.
      
      To support this
      a) ClassOps have a BuiltInRule (see MkId.dictSelRule)
      b) DFuns have a special form of unfolding (CoreSyn.DFunUnfolding)
         which is exploited in CoreUnfold.exprIsConApp_maybe
      
      Implmenting all this required a root-and-branch rework of TcInstDcls
      and bits of TcClassDcl.
      
      
      Default methods
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      If you give an INLINE pragma to a default method, it should be just
      as if you'd written out that code in each instance declaration, including
      the INLINE pragma.  I think that it now *is* so.  As a result, library
      code can be simpler; less duplication.
      
      
      The CONLIKE pragma
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      In the DPH project, Roman found cases where he had
      
         p n k = let x = replicate n k
                 in ...(f x)...(g x)....
      
         {-# RULE f (replicate x) = f_rep x #-}
      
      Normally the RULE would not fire, because doing so involves 
      (in effect) duplicating the redex (replicate n k).  A new
      experimental modifier to the INLINE pragma, {-# INLINE CONLIKE
      replicate #-}, allows you to tell GHC to be prepared to duplicate
      a call of this function if it allows a RULE to fire.
      
      See Note [CONLIKE pragma] in BasicTypes
      
      
      Join points
      ~~~~~~~~~~~
      See Note [Case binders and join points] in Simplify
      
      
      Other refactoring
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      * I moved endPass from CoreLint to CoreMonad, with associated jigglings
      
      * Better pretty-printing of Core
      
      * The top-level RULES (ones that are not rules for locally-defined things)
        are now substituted on every simplifier iteration.  I'm not sure how
        we got away without doing this before.  This entails a bit more plumbing
        in SimplCore.
      
      * The necessary stuff to serialise and deserialise the new
        info across interface files.
      
      * Something about bottoming floats in SetLevels
            Note [Bottoming floats]
      
      * substUnfolding has moved from SimplEnv to CoreSubs, where it belongs
      
      
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Program           Size    Allocs   Runtime   Elapsed
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 anna          +2.4%     -0.5%      0.16      0.17
                 ansi          +2.6%     -0.1%      0.00      0.00
                 atom          -3.8%     -0.0%     -1.0%     -2.5%
               awards          +3.0%     +0.7%      0.00      0.00
               banner          +3.3%     -0.0%      0.00      0.00
           bernouilli          +2.7%     +0.0%     -4.6%     -6.9%
                boyer          +2.6%     +0.0%      0.06      0.07
               boyer2          +4.4%     +0.2%      0.01      0.01
                 bspt          +3.2%     +9.6%      0.02      0.02
            cacheprof          +1.4%     -1.0%    -12.2%    -13.6%
             calendar          +2.7%     -1.7%      0.00      0.00
             cichelli          +3.7%     -0.0%      0.13      0.14
              circsim          +3.3%     +0.0%     -2.3%     -9.9%
             clausify          +2.7%     +0.0%      0.05      0.06
        comp_lab_zift          +2.6%     -0.3%     -7.2%     -7.9%
             compress          +3.3%     +0.0%     -8.5%     -9.6%
            compress2          +3.6%     +0.0%    -15.1%    -17.8%
          constraints          +2.7%     -0.6%    -10.0%    -10.7%
         cryptarithm1          +4.5%     +0.0%     -4.7%     -5.7%
         cryptarithm2          +4.3%    -14.5%      0.02      0.02
                  cse          +4.4%     -0.0%      0.00      0.00
                eliza          +2.8%     -0.1%      0.00      0.00
                event          +2.6%     -0.0%     -4.9%     -4.4%
               exp3_8          +2.8%     +0.0%     -4.5%     -9.5%
               expert          +2.7%     +0.3%      0.00      0.00
                  fem          -2.0%     +0.6%      0.04      0.04
                  fft          -6.0%     +1.8%      0.05      0.06
                 fft2          -4.8%     +2.7%      0.13      0.14
             fibheaps          +2.6%     -0.6%      0.05      0.05
                 fish          +4.1%     +0.0%      0.03      0.04
                fluid          -2.1%     -0.2%      0.01      0.01
               fulsom          -4.8%     +9.2%     +9.1%     +8.4%
               gamteb          -7.1%     -1.3%      0.10      0.11
                  gcd          +2.7%     +0.0%      0.05      0.05
          gen_regexps          +3.9%     -0.0%      0.00      0.00
               genfft          +2.7%     -0.1%      0.05      0.06
                   gg          -2.7%     -0.1%      0.02      0.02
                 grep          +3.2%     -0.0%      0.00      0.00
               hidden          -0.5%     +0.0%    -11.9%    -13.3%
                  hpg          -3.0%     -1.8%     +0.0%     -2.4%
                  ida          +2.6%     -1.2%      0.17     -9.0%
                infer          +1.7%     -0.8%      0.08      0.09
              integer          +2.5%     -0.0%     -2.6%     -2.2%
            integrate          -5.0%     +0.0%     -1.3%     -2.9%
              knights          +4.3%     -1.5%      0.01      0.01
                 lcss          +2.5%     -0.1%     -7.5%     -9.4%
                 life          +4.2%     +0.0%     -3.1%     -3.3%
                 lift          +2.4%     -3.2%      0.00      0.00
            listcompr          +4.0%     -1.6%      0.16      0.17
             listcopy          +4.0%     -1.4%      0.17      0.18
             maillist          +4.1%     +0.1%      0.09      0.14
               mandel          +2.9%     +0.0%      0.11      0.12
              mandel2          +4.7%     +0.0%      0.01      0.01
              minimax          +3.8%     -0.0%      0.00      0.00
              mkhprog          +3.2%     -4.2%      0.00      0.00
           multiplier          +2.5%     -0.4%     +0.7%     -1.3%
             nucleic2          -9.3%     +0.0%      0.10      0.10
                 para          +2.9%     +0.1%     -0.7%     -1.2%
            paraffins         -10.4%     +0.0%      0.20     -1.9%
               parser          +3.1%     -0.0%      0.05      0.05
              parstof          +1.9%     -0.0%      0.00      0.01
                  pic          -2.8%     -0.8%      0.01      0.02
                power          +2.1%     +0.1%     -8.5%     -9.0%
               pretty         -12.7%     +0.1%      0.00      0.00
               primes          +2.8%     +0.0%      0.11      0.11
            primetest          +2.5%     -0.0%     -2.1%     -3.1%
               prolog          +3.2%     -7.2%      0.00      0.00
               puzzle          +4.1%     +0.0%     -3.5%     -8.0%
               queens          +2.8%     +0.0%      0.03      0.03
              reptile          +2.2%     -2.2%      0.02      0.02
              rewrite          +3.1%    +10.9%      0.03      0.03
                 rfib          -5.2%     +0.2%      0.03      0.03
                  rsa          +2.6%     +0.0%      0.05      0.06
                  scc          +4.6%     +0.4%      0.00      0.00
                sched          +2.7%     +0.1%      0.03      0.03
                  scs          -2.6%     -0.9%     -9.6%    -11.6%
               simple          -4.0%     +0.4%    -14.6%    -14.9%
                solid          -5.6%     -0.6%     -9.3%    -14.3%
              sorting          +3.8%     +0.0%      0.00      0.00
               sphere          -3.6%     +8.5%      0.15      0.16
               symalg          -1.3%     +0.2%      0.03      0.03
                  tak          +2.7%     +0.0%      0.02      0.02
            transform          +2.0%     -2.9%     -8.0%     -8.8%
             treejoin          +3.1%     +0.0%    -17.5%    -17.8%
            typecheck          +2.9%     -0.3%     -4.6%     -6.6%
              veritas          +3.9%     -0.3%      0.00      0.00
                 wang          -6.2%     +0.0%      0.18     -9.8%
            wave4main         -10.3%     +2.6%     -2.1%     -2.3%
         wheel-sieve1          +2.7%     -0.0%     +0.3%     -0.6%
         wheel-sieve2          +2.7%     +0.0%     -3.7%     -7.5%
                 x2n1          -4.1%     +0.1%      0.03      0.04
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Min         -12.7%    -14.5%    -17.5%    -17.8%
                  Max          +4.7%    +10.9%     +9.1%     +8.4%
       Geometric Mean          +0.9%     -0.1%     -5.6%     -7.3%
      72462499
  16. 21 Aug, 2009 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Fix Trac #3423: missed instantiation for newtype-derived instances · b70fc87d
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      Somehow I'd forgotten to instantiate the coercion that is stored in a
      'NewtypeDerived' constructor in an InstInfo.  The necessary code is
      in TcInstDcls.tc_inst_decl2.
      
      The result was ghc: panic! (the 'impossible' happened)
         (GHC version 6.10.3 for x86_64-unknown-linux):
         No match in record selector Var.tcTyVarDetails
      because we were looking at an (uninstantiated) TyVar instead of
      an (instantiated) TcTyVar.
      b70fc87d
  17. 23 Jul, 2009 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Fix Trac #3012: allow more free-wheeling in standalone deriving · aa0c0de9
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      In standalone deriving, we now do *not* check side conditions.
      We simply generate the code and typecheck it.  If there's a type
      error, it's the programmer's problem. 
      
      This means that you can do 'deriving instance Show (T a)', where
      T is a GADT, for example, provided of course that the boilerplate
      code does in fact typecheck.
      
      I put some work into getting a decent error message.  In particular
      if there's a type error in a method, GHC will show the entire code
      for that method (since, after all, the user did not write it).
      Most of the changes are to achieve that goal.
      
      Still to come: changes in the documentation.
      aa0c0de9
  18. 06 Jul, 2009 1 commit
  19. 28 May, 2009 1 commit
  20. 27 May, 2009 1 commit
  21. 18 Mar, 2009 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Add the notion of "constructor-like" Ids for rule-matching · 4bc25e8c
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      This patch adds an optional CONLIKE modifier to INLINE/NOINLINE pragmas, 
         {-# NOINLINE CONLIKE [1] f #-}
      The effect is to allow applications of 'f' to be expanded in a potential
      rule match.  Example
        {-# RULE "r/f" forall v. r (f v) = f (v+1) #-}
      
      Consider the term
           let x = f v in ..x...x...(r x)...
      Normally the (r x) would not match the rule, because GHC would be scared
      about duplicating the redex (f v). However the CONLIKE modifier says to
      treat 'f' like a constructor in this situation, and "look through" the
      unfolding for x.  So (r x) fires, yielding (f (v+1)).
      
      The main changes are:
        - Syntax
      
        - The inlinePragInfo field of an IdInfo has a RuleMatchInfo
          component, which records whether or not the Id is CONLIKE.
          Of course, this needs to be serialised in interface files too.
      
        - The occurrence analyser (OccAnal) and simplifier (Simplify) treat
          CONLIKE thing like constructors, by ANF-ing them
      
        - New function coreUtils.exprIsExpandable is like exprIsCheap, but
          additionally spots applications of CONLIKE functions
      
        - A CoreUnfolding has a field that caches exprIsExpandable
      
        - The rule matcher consults this field.  See 
          Note [Expanding variables] in Rules.lhs.
      
      On the way I fixed a lurking variable bug in the way variables are
      expanded.  See Note [Do not expand locally-bound variables] in
      Rule.lhs.  I also did a bit of reformatting and refactoring in
      Rules.lhs, so the module has more lines changed than are really
      different.
      4bc25e8c
  22. 30 Jan, 2009 1 commit
  23. 13 Jan, 2009 1 commit
  24. 02 Jan, 2009 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Make record selectors into ordinary functions · 9ffadf21
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      This biggish patch addresses Trac #2670.  The main effect is to make
      record selectors into ordinary functions, whose unfoldings appear in
      interface files, in contrast to their previous existence as magic
      "implicit Ids".  This means that the usual machinery of optimisation,
      analysis, and inlining applies to them, which was failing before when
      the selector was somewhat complicated.  (Which it can be when
      strictness annotations, unboxing annotations, and GADTs are involved.)
      
      The change involves the following points
      
      * Changes in Var.lhs to the representation of Var.  Now a LocalId can
        have an IdDetails as well as a GlobalId.  In particular, the
        information that an Id is a record selector is kept in the
        IdDetails.  While compiling the current module, the record selector
        *must* be a LocalId, so that it participates properly in compilation
        (free variables etc).
      
        This led me to change the (hidden) representation of Var, so that there
        is now only one constructor for Id, not two.
      
      * The IdDetails is persisted into interface files, so that an
        importing module can see which Ids are records selectors.
      
      * In TcTyClDecls, we generate the record-selector bindings in renamed,
        but not typechecked form.  In this way, we can get the typechecker
        to add all the types and so on, which is jolly helpful especially
        when GADTs or type families are involved.  Just like derived
        instance declarations.
      
        This is the big new chunk of 180 lines of code (much of which is
        commentary).  A call to the same function, mkAuxBinds, is needed in
        TcInstDcls for associated types.
      
      * The typechecker therefore has to pin the correct IdDetails on to 
        the record selector, when it typechecks it.  There was a neat way
        to do this, by adding a new sort of signature to HsBinds.Sig, namely
        IdSig.  This contains an Id (with the correct Name, Type, and IdDetails);
        the type checker uses it as the binder for the final binding.  This
        worked out rather easily.
      
      * Record selectors are no longer "implicit ids", which entails changes to
           IfaceSyn.ifaceDeclSubBndrs
           HscTypes.implicitTyThings
           TidyPgm.getImplicitBinds
        (These three functions must agree.)
      
      * MkId.mkRecordSelectorId is deleted entirely, some 300+ lines (incl
        comments) of very error prone code.  Happy days.
      
      * A TyCon no longer contains the list of record selectors: 
        algTcSelIds is gone
      
      The renamer is unaffected, including the way that import and export of
      record selectors is handled.
      
      Other small things
      
      * IfaceSyn.ifaceDeclSubBndrs had a fragile test for whether a data
        constructor had a wrapper.  I've replaced that with an explicit flag
        in the interface file. More robust I hope.
      
      * I renamed isIdVar to isId, which touched a few otherwise-unrelated files.
      
      9ffadf21
  25. 31 Dec, 2008 2 commits
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Fix Trac #2856: make deriving work for type families · 79a6f3fa
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      Darn, but TcDeriv is complicated, when type families get in on
      the act!  This patch makes GeneralisedNewtypeDeriving work 
      properly for type families.  I think.
      
      In order to do so, I found that GeneralisedNewtypeDeriving can
      work for recursive newtypes too -- and since families are conservatively
      marked recursive, that's a crucial part of the fix, and useful too.
      See Note [Recursive newtypes] in TcDeriv.
      79a6f3fa
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Improve error reporting for 'deriving' · 9b69d74f
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      a) Improve the extra suggested fix when there's a "no instance"
         error in a deriving clause.
      
      b) Improve error location recording in tcInstDecl2
      
      Many of the changes in tcInstDecl2 are simple reformatting.
      
      9b69d74f
  26. 30 Dec, 2008 3 commits
  27. 16 Dec, 2008 1 commit
    • Simon Marlow's avatar
      Rollback INLINE patches · e79c9ce0
      Simon Marlow authored
      rolling back:
      
      Fri Dec  5 16:54:00 GMT 2008  simonpj@microsoft.com
        * Completely new treatment of INLINE pragmas (big patch)
        
        This is a major patch, which changes the way INLINE pragmas work.
        Although lots of files are touched, the net is only +21 lines of
        code -- and I bet that most of those are comments!
        
        HEADS UP: interface file format has changed, so you'll need to
        recompile everything.
        
        There is not much effect on overall performance for nofib, 
        probably because those programs don't make heavy use of INLINE pragmas.
        
                Program           Size    Allocs   Runtime   Elapsed
                    Min         -11.3%     -6.9%     -9.2%     -8.2%
                    Max          -0.1%     +4.6%     +7.5%     +8.9%
         Geometric Mean          -2.2%     -0.2%     -1.0%     -0.8%
        
        (The +4.6% for on allocs is cichelli; see other patch relating to
        -fpass-case-bndr-to-join-points.)
        
        The old INLINE system
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        The old system worked like this. A function with an INLINE pragam
        got a right-hand side which looked like
             f = __inline_me__ (\xy. e)
        The __inline_me__ part was an InlineNote, and was treated specially
        in various ways.  Notably, the simplifier didn't inline inside an
        __inline_me__ note.  
        
        As a result, the code for f itself was pretty crappy. That matters
        if you say (map f xs), because then you execute the code for f,
        rather than inlining a copy at the call site.
        
        The new story: InlineRules
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        The new system removes the InlineMe Note altogether.  Instead there
        is a new constructor InlineRule in CoreSyn.Unfolding.  This is a 
        bit like a RULE, in that it remembers the template to be inlined inside
        the InlineRule.  No simplification or inlining is done on an InlineRule,
        just like RULEs.  
        
        An Id can have an InlineRule *or* a CoreUnfolding (since these are two
        constructors from Unfolding). The simplifier treats them differently:
        
          - An InlineRule is has the substitution applied (like RULES) but 
            is otherwise left undisturbed.
        
          - A CoreUnfolding is updated with the new RHS of the definition,
            on each iteration of the simplifier.
        
        An InlineRule fires regardless of size, but *only* when the function
        is applied to enough arguments.  The "arity" of the rule is specified
        (by the programmer) as the number of args on the LHS of the "=".  So
        it makes a difference whether you say
          	{-# INLINE f #-}
        	f x = \y -> e     or     f x y = e
        This is one of the big new features that InlineRule gives us, and it
        is one that Roman really wanted.
        
        In contrast, a CoreUnfolding can fire when it is applied to fewer
        args than than the function has lambdas, provided the result is small
        enough.
        
        
        Consequential stuff
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        * A 'wrapper' no longer has a WrapperInfo in the IdInfo.  Instead,
          the InlineRule has a field identifying wrappers.
        
        * Of course, IfaceSyn and interface serialisation changes appropriately.
        
        * Making implication constraints inline nicely was a bit fiddly. In
          the end I added a var_inline field to HsBInd.VarBind, which is why
          this patch affects the type checker slightly
        
        * I made some changes to the way in which eta expansion happens in
          CorePrep, mainly to ensure that *arguments* that become let-bound
          are also eta-expanded.  I'm still not too happy with the clarity
          and robustness fo the result.
        
        * We now complain if the programmer gives an INLINE pragma for
          a recursive function (prevsiously we just ignored it).  Reason for
          change: we don't want an InlineRule on a LoopBreaker, because then
          we'd have to check for loop-breaker-hood at occurrence sites (which
          isn't currenlty done).  Some tests need changing as a result.
        
        This patch has been in my tree for quite a while, so there are
        probably some other minor changes.
        
      
          M ./compiler/basicTypes/Id.lhs -11
          M ./compiler/basicTypes/IdInfo.lhs -82
          M ./compiler/basicTypes/MkId.lhs -2 +2
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreFVs.lhs -2 +25
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreLint.lhs -5 +1
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/CorePrep.lhs -59 +53
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreSubst.lhs -22 +31
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreSyn.lhs -66 +92
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUnfold.lhs -112 +112
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs -185 +184
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/MkExternalCore.lhs -1
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/PprCore.lhs -4 +40
          M ./compiler/deSugar/DsBinds.lhs -70 +118
          M ./compiler/deSugar/DsForeign.lhs -2 +4
          M ./compiler/deSugar/DsMeta.hs -4 +3
          M ./compiler/hsSyn/HsBinds.lhs -3 +3
          M ./compiler/hsSyn/HsUtils.lhs -2 +7
          M ./compiler/iface/BinIface.hs -11 +25
          M ./compiler/iface/IfaceSyn.lhs -13 +21
          M ./compiler/iface/MkIface.lhs -24 +19
          M ./compiler/iface/TcIface.lhs -29 +23
          M ./compiler/main/TidyPgm.lhs -55 +49
          M ./compiler/parser/ParserCore.y -5 +6
          M ./compiler/simplCore/CSE.lhs -2 +1
          M ./compiler/simplCore/FloatIn.lhs -6 +1
          M ./compiler/simplCore/FloatOut.lhs -23
          M ./compiler/simplCore/OccurAnal.lhs -36 +5
          M ./compiler/simplCore/SetLevels.lhs -59 +54
          M ./compiler/simplCore/SimplCore.lhs -48 +52
          M ./compiler/simplCore/SimplEnv.lhs -26 +22
          M ./compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.lhs -28 +4
          M ./compiler/simplCore/Simplify.lhs -91 +109
          M ./compiler/specialise/Specialise.lhs -15 +18
          M ./compiler/stranal/WorkWrap.lhs -14 +11
          M ./compiler/stranal/WwLib.lhs -2 +2
          M ./compiler/typecheck/Inst.lhs -1 +3
          M ./compiler/typecheck/TcBinds.lhs -17 +27
          M ./compiler/typecheck/TcClassDcl.lhs -1 +2
          M ./compiler/typecheck/TcExpr.lhs -4 +6
          M ./compiler/typecheck/TcForeign.lhs -1 +1
          M ./compiler/typecheck/TcGenDeriv.lhs -14 +13
          M ./compiler/typecheck/TcHsSyn.lhs -3 +2
          M ./compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs -5 +4
          M ./compiler/typecheck/TcRnDriver.lhs -2 +11
          M ./compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs -10 +17
          M ./compiler/vectorise/VectType.hs +7
      
      Mon Dec  8 12:43:10 GMT 2008  simonpj@microsoft.com
        * White space only
      
          M ./compiler/simplCore/Simplify.lhs -2
      
      Mon Dec  8 12:48:40 GMT 2008  simonpj@microsoft.com
        * Move simpleOptExpr from CoreUnfold to CoreSubst
      
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreSubst.lhs -1 +87
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUnfold.lhs -72 +1
      
      Mon Dec  8 17:30:18 GMT 2008  simonpj@microsoft.com
        * Use CoreSubst.simpleOptExpr in place of the ad-hoc simpleSubst (reduces code too)
      
          M ./compiler/deSugar/DsBinds.lhs -50 +16
      
      Tue Dec  9 17:03:02 GMT 2008  simonpj@microsoft.com
        * Fix Trac #2861: bogus eta expansion
        
        Urghlhl!  I "tided up" the treatment of the "state hack" in CoreUtils, but
        missed an unexpected interaction with the way that a bottoming function
        simply swallows excess arguments.  There's a long
             Note [State hack and bottoming functions]
        to explain (which accounts for most of the new lines of code).
        
      
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs -16 +53
      
      Mon Dec 15 10:02:21 GMT 2008  Simon Marlow <marlowsd@gmail.com>
        * Revert CorePrep part of "Completely new treatment of INLINE pragmas..."
        
        The original patch said:
        
        * I made some changes to the way in which eta expansion happens in
          CorePrep, mainly to ensure that *arguments* that become let-bound
          are also eta-expanded.  I'm still not too happy with the clarity
          and robustness fo the result.
          
        Unfortunately this change apparently broke some invariants that were
        relied on elsewhere, and in particular lead to panics when compiling
        with profiling on.
        
        Will re-investigate in the new year.
      
          M ./compiler/coreSyn/CorePrep.lhs -53 +58
          M ./configure.ac -1 +1
      
      Mon Dec 15 12:28:51 GMT 2008  Simon Marlow <marlowsd@gmail.com>
        * revert accidental change to configure.ac
      
          M ./configure.ac -1 +1
      e79c9ce0
  28. 05 Dec, 2008 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Completely new treatment of INLINE pragmas (big patch) · d95ce839
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      This is a major patch, which changes the way INLINE pragmas work.
      Although lots of files are touched, the net is only +21 lines of
      code -- and I bet that most of those are comments!
      
      HEADS UP: interface file format has changed, so you'll need to
      recompile everything.
      
      There is not much effect on overall performance for nofib, 
      probably because those programs don't make heavy use of INLINE pragmas.
      
              Program           Size    Allocs   Runtime   Elapsed
                  Min         -11.3%     -6.9%     -9.2%     -8.2%
                  Max          -0.1%     +4.6%     +7.5%     +8.9%
       Geometric Mean          -2.2%     -0.2%     -1.0%     -0.8%
      
      (The +4.6% for on allocs is cichelli; see other patch relating to
      -fpass-case-bndr-to-join-points.)
      
      The old INLINE system
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      The old system worked like this. A function with an INLINE pragam
      got a right-hand side which looked like
           f = __inline_me__ (\xy. e)
      The __inline_me__ part was an InlineNote, and was treated specially
      in various ways.  Notably, the simplifier didn't inline inside an
      __inline_me__ note.  
      
      As a result, the code for f itself was pretty crappy. That matters
      if you say (map f xs), because then you execute the code for f,
      rather than inlining a copy at the call site.
      
      The new story: InlineRules
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      The new system removes the InlineMe Note altogether.  Instead there
      is a new constructor InlineRule in CoreSyn.Unfolding.  This is a 
      bit like a RULE, in that it remembers the template to be inlined inside
      the InlineRule.  No simplification or inlining is done on an InlineRule,
      just like RULEs.  
      
      An Id can have an InlineRule *or* a CoreUnfolding (since these are two
      constructors from Unfolding). The simplifier treats them differently:
      
        - An InlineRule is has the substitution applied (like RULES) but 
          is otherwise left undisturbed.
      
        - A CoreUnfolding is updated with the new RHS of the definition,
          on each iteration of the simplifier.
      
      An InlineRule fires regardless of size, but *only* when the function
      is applied to enough arguments.  The "arity" of the rule is specified
      (by the programmer) as the number of args on the LHS of the "=".  So
      it makes a difference whether you say
        	{-# INLINE f #-}
      	f x = \y -> e     or     f x y = e
      This is one of the big new features that InlineRule gives us, and it
      is one that Roman really wanted.
      
      In contrast, a CoreUnfolding can fire when it is applied to fewer
      args than than the function has lambdas, provided the result is small
      enough.
      
      
      Consequential stuff
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      * A 'wrapper' no longer has a WrapperInfo in the IdInfo.  Instead,
        the InlineRule has a field identifying wrappers.
      
      * Of course, IfaceSyn and interface serialisation changes appropriately.
      
      * Making implication constraints inline nicely was a bit fiddly. In
        the end I added a var_inline field to HsBInd.VarBind, which is why
        this patch affects the type checker slightly
      
      * I made some changes to the way in which eta expansion happens in
        CorePrep, mainly to ensure that *arguments* that become let-bound
        are also eta-expanded.  I'm still not too happy with the clarity
        and robustness fo the result.
      
      * We now complain if the programmer gives an INLINE pragma for
        a recursive function (prevsiously we just ignored it).  Reason for
        change: we don't want an InlineRule on a LoopBreaker, because then
        we'd have to check for loop-breaker-hood at occurrence sites (which
        isn't currenlty done).  Some tests need changing as a result.
      
      This patch has been in my tree for quite a while, so there are
      probably some other minor changes.
      d95ce839
  29. 20 Sep, 2008 1 commit
  30. 18 Sep, 2008 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Fix Trac #1470: improve handling of recursive instances (needed for SYB3) · 5045af31
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      This bug has been hanging around for a long time, as you'll see by its
      number. The fix implements a feature that is really needed by SYB3, to
      allow an instance to (rather indirectly) refer to itself.  The trickiness
      comes when solving the superclass constraints.
      
      The whoel issue is explained in Note [Recursive instances and superclases]
      in TcSimplify.
      
      In cracking this one I found I could remove the WantSCs argument to the
      ReduceMe flag, which is a worthwhile simplification.  Good!
      5045af31
  31. 10 Sep, 2008 2 commits
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Check the *right* set of type variables for escape! · 62ee856c
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      I did the wrong checkSigTyVars, which (happily) triggered an ASSERT
      failure.  This should fix it.
      62ee856c
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      More refactoring of instance declarations (fixes Trac #2572) · aaed05e8
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      In refactoring instance declarations I'd taken a short cut over
      scoped type variables, but it wasn't right as #2572 shows.
      
      Fixing it required a significant chunk of further refactoring,
      alas. But it's done!  Quite tidily as it turns out.
      
      The main issue is that when typechecking a default method, we
      need two sets of type variables in scope
      	class C a where
         	  op :: forall b. ...
      	  op = e
      In 'e', *both* 'a' and 'b' are in scope.  But the type of the
      default method has a nested flavour
      	op :: forall a. C a => forall b. ....
      and our normal scoping mechanisms don't bring 'b' into scope.
      (And probably shouldn't.)  
      
      Solution (which is done for instance methods too) is to use
      a local defintion, like this:
      
        $dmop :: forall a. C a => forall b. ....
        $dmop a d = let 
                       op :: forall b. ...
                       op = e
                    in op
      
      and now the scoping works out.  I hope I have now see the
      last of this code for a bit!
      aaed05e8
  32. 05 Sep, 2008 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Fix up the instance-declaration re-engineering story · 4f597914
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      This patch deals with a rather complicated situation involving
      overlapping instances.  It's all explained in the commments
         Note [Subtle interaction of recursion and overlap]
      
      The absence of this case make DoCon and regex-base fail with
      an error about overlapping instances.  Now they work properly 
      again.
      
      4f597914
  33. 03 Sep, 2008 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Major change in compilation of instance declarations (fix Trac #955, #2328) · f16dbbbe
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      This patch makes an important change to the way that dictionary
      functions are handled.  Before, they were unconditionally marked
      INLIINE, but all the code written by the user in the instance
      was inside that unconditionally-inlined function.  Result: massive
      code bloat in programs that use complicated instances.
      
      This patch make instances behave rather as if all the methods
      were written in separate definitions.  That dramatically reduces
      bloat.  The new plan is described in TcInstDcls
      	Note [How instance declarations are translated]
      
      Everything validates.  The major code-bloat bug is squashed: in particular
      DoCon is fine now (Trac #2328) and I believe that #955 is also better.
      
      Nofib results:
      
      Binary sizes
              -1 s.d.      +2.5%
              +1 s.d.      +3.1%
              Average      +2.8%
      
      Allocations
              -1 s.d.      -6.4%
              +1 s.d.      +2.5%
              Average      -2.0%
      
      Note that 2% improvement.  Some programs improve by 20% (rewrite)!
      Two get slightly worse: pic (2.1%), and gameteb (3.2%), but all others
      improve or stay the same.
      
      I am not absolutely 100% certain that all the corners are correct; for
      example, when default methods are marked INLINE, are they inlined?  But
      overall it's better.
      
      It's nice that the patch also removes a lot of code.  I deleted some
      out of date comments, but there's something like 100 fewer lines of
      code in the new version!  (In the line counts below, there are a lot
      of new comments.)
      f16dbbbe
  34. 27 Aug, 2008 1 commit
  35. 31 Jul, 2008 1 commit