1. 18 Jun, 2012 2 commits
  2. 15 May, 2012 1 commit
    • batterseapower's avatar
      Support code generation for unboxed-tuple function arguments · 09987de4
      batterseapower authored
      This is done by a 'unarisation' pre-pass at the STG level which
      translates away all (live) binders binding something of unboxed
      tuple type.
      
      This has the following knock-on effects:
        * The subkind hierarchy is vastly simplified (no UbxTupleKind or ArgKind)
        * Various relaxed type checks in typechecker, 'foreign import prim' etc
        * All case binders may be live at the Core level
      09987de4
  3. 27 Apr, 2012 1 commit
  4. 04 Mar, 2012 1 commit
    • Simon Peyton Jones's avatar
      Tidy up the handling of kind generalisation · e0c849e0
      Simon Peyton Jones authored
      In particular in forall abc. <blah> we should
      kind generalise over <blah> as well as over the
      kinds of a,b,c.
      
      This fixes bug (in Trac #5862, caught by Lint) in the handling of
        data SMaybe a where
           SNothing :: SMaybe 'Nothing
      where I didn't get a sufficiently general kind. And it's simpler.
      e0c849e0
  5. 02 Mar, 2012 1 commit
    • Simon Peyton Jones's avatar
      Hurrah! This major commit adds support for scoped kind variables, · 3bf54e78
      Simon Peyton Jones authored
      which (finally) fills out the functionality of polymorphic kinds.
      It also fixes numerous bugs.
      
      Main changes are:
      
      Renaming stuff
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      * New type in HsTypes:
           data HsBndrSig sig = HsBSig sig [Name]
        which is used for type signatures in patterns, and kind signatures
        in types.  So when you say
             f (x :: [a]) = x ++ x
        or
             data T (f :: k -> *) (x :: *) = MkT (f x)
        the signatures in both cases are a HsBndrSig.
      
      * The [Name] in HsBndrSig records the variables bound by the
        pattern, that is 'a' in the first example, 'k' in the second,
        and nothing in the third.  The renamer initialises the field.
      
      * As a result I was able to get rid of
           RnHsSyn.extractHsTyNames :: LHsType Name -> NameSet
        and its friends altogether.  Deleted the entire module!
        This led to some knock-on refactoring; in particular the
        type renamer now returns the free variables just like the
        term renamer.
      
      Kind-checking types: mainly TcHsType
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      A major change is that instead of kind-checking types in two
      passes, we now do one. Under the old scheme, the first pass did
      kind-checking and (hackily) annotated the HsType with the
      inferred kinds; and the second pass desugared the HsType to a
      Type.  But now that we have kind variables inside types, the
      first pass (TcHsType.tc_hs_type) can go straight to Type, and
      zonking will squeeze out any kind unification variables later.
      
      This is much nicer, but it was much more fiddly than I had expected.
      
      The nastiest corner is this: it's very important that tc_hs_type
      uses lazy constructors to build the returned type. See
      Note [Zonking inside the knot] in TcHsType.
      
      Type-checking type and class declarations: mainly TcTyClsDecls
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      I did tons of refactoring in TcTyClsDecls.  Simpler and nicer now.
      
      Typechecking bindings: mainly TcBinds
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      I rejigged (yet again) the handling of type signatures in TcBinds.
      It's a bit simpler now.  The main change is that tcTySigs goes
      right through to a TcSigInfo in one step; previously it was split
      into two, part here and part later.
      
      Unsafe coercions
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Usually equality coercions have exactly the same kind on both
      sides.  But we do allow an *unsafe* coercion between Int# and Bool,
      say, used in
          case error Bool "flah" of { True -> 3#; False -> 0# }
      -->
          (error Bool "flah") |> unsafeCoerce Bool Int#
      
      So what is the instantiation of (~#) here?
         unsafeCoerce Bool Int# :: (~#) ??? Bool Int#
      I'm using OpenKind here for now, but it's un-satisfying that
      the lhs and rhs of the ~ don't have precisely the same kind.
      
      More minor
      ~~~~~~~~~~
      * HsDecl.TySynonym has its free variables attached, which makes
        the cycle computation in TcTyDecls.mkSynEdges easier.
      
      * Fixed a nasty reversed-comparison bug in FamInstEnv:
        @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ lookup_fam_inst_env' match_fun one_sided ie fam tys
           n_tys = length tys
           extra_tys = drop arity tys
           (match_tys, add_extra_tys)
      -       | arity > n_tys = (take arity tys, \res_tys -> res_tys ++ extra_tys)
      +       | arity < n_tys = (take arity tys, \res_tys -> res_tys ++ extra_tys)
              | otherwise     = (tys,            \res_tys -> res_tys)
      3bf54e78
  6. 16 Feb, 2012 1 commit
  7. 03 Jan, 2012 1 commit
    • Simon Peyton Jones's avatar
      Major refactoring of CoAxioms · 98a642cf
      Simon Peyton Jones authored
      This patch should have no user-visible effect.  It implements a
      significant internal refactoring of the way that FC axioms are
      handled.  The ultimate goal is to put us in a position to implement
      "pattern-matching axioms".  But the changes here are only does
      refactoring; there is no change in functionality.
      
      Specifically:
      
       * We now treat data/type family instance declarations very,
         very similarly to types class instance declarations:
      
         - Renamed InstEnv.Instance as InstEnv.ClsInst, for symmetry with
           FamInstEnv.FamInst.  This change does affect the GHC API, but
           for the better I think.
      
         - Previously, each family type/data instance declaration gave rise
           to a *TyCon*; typechecking a type/data instance decl produced
           that TyCon.  Now, each type/data instance gives rise to
           a *FamInst*, by direct analogy with each class instance
           declaration giving rise to a ClsInst.
      
         - Just as each ClsInst contains its evidence, a DFunId, so each FamInst
           contains its evidence, a CoAxiom.  See Note [FamInsts and CoAxioms]
           in FamInstEnv.  The CoAxiom is a System-FC thing, and can relate any
           two types, whereas the FamInst relates directly to the Haskell source
           language construct, and always has a function (F tys) on the LHS.
      
         - Just as a DFunId has its own declaration in an interface file, so now
           do CoAxioms (see IfaceSyn.IfaceAxiom).
      
         These changes give rise to almost all the refactoring.
      
       * We used to have a hack whereby a type family instance produced a dummy
         type synonym, thus
            type instance F Int = Bool -> Bool
         translated to
            axiom FInt :: F Int ~ R:FInt
            type R:FInt = Bool -> Bool
         This was always a hack, and now it's gone.  Instead the type instance
         declaration produces a FamInst, whose axiom has kind
            axiom FInt :: F Int ~ Bool -> Bool
         just as you'd expect.
      
       * Newtypes are done just as before; they generate a CoAxiom. These
         CoAxioms are "implicit" (do not generate an IfaceAxiom declaration),
         unlike the ones coming from family instance declarations.  See
         Note [Implicit axioms] in TyCon
      
      On the whole the code gets significantly nicer.  There were consequential
      tidy-ups in the vectoriser, but I think I got them right.
      98a642cf
  8. 05 Dec, 2011 1 commit
    • Simon Peyton Jones's avatar
      Allow full constraint solving under a for-all (Trac #5595) · 2e6dcdf7
      Simon Peyton Jones authored
      The main idea is that when we unify
          forall a. t1  ~  forall a. t2
      we get constraints from unifying t1~t2 that mention a.
      We are producing a coercion witnessing the equivalence of
      the for-alls, and inside *that* coercion we need bindings
      for the solved constraints arising from t1~t2.
      
      We didn't have way to do this before.  The big change is
      that here's a new type TcEvidence.TcCoercion, which is
      much like Coercion.Coercion except that there's a slot
      for TcEvBinds in it.
      
      This has a wave of follow-on changes. Not deep but broad.
      
      * New module TcEvidence, which now contains the HsWrapper
        TcEvBinds, EvTerm etc types that used to be in HsBinds
      
      * The typechecker works exclusively in terms of TcCoercion.
      
      * The desugarer converts TcCoercion to Coercion
      
      * The main payload is in TcUnify.unifySigmaTy. This is the
        function that had a gross hack before, but is now beautiful.
      
      * LCoercion is gone!  Hooray.
      
      Many many fiddly changes in conssequence.  But it's nice.
      2e6dcdf7
  9. 14 Nov, 2011 1 commit
  10. 11 Nov, 2011 1 commit
    • dreixel's avatar
      New kind-polymorphic core · 09015be8
      dreixel authored
      This big patch implements a kind-polymorphic core for GHC. The current
      implementation focuses on making sure that all kind-monomorphic programs still
      work in the new core; it is not yet guaranteed that kind-polymorphic programs
      (using the new -XPolyKinds flag) will work.
      
      For more information, see http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC/Kinds
      09015be8
  11. 04 Nov, 2011 1 commit
  12. 16 Sep, 2011 1 commit
  13. 06 Sep, 2011 1 commit
    • batterseapower's avatar
      Implement -XConstraintKind · 9729fe7c
      batterseapower authored
      Basically as documented in http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/KindFact,
      this patch adds a new kind Constraint such that:
      
        Show :: * -> Constraint
        (?x::Int) :: Constraint
        (Int ~ a) :: Constraint
      
      And you can write *any* type with kind Constraint to the left of (=>):
      even if that type is a type synonym, type variable, indexed type or so on.
      
      The following (somewhat related) changes are also made:
       1. We now box equality evidence. This is required because we want
          to give (Int ~ a) the *lifted* kind Constraint
       2. For similar reasons, implicit parameters can now only be of
          a lifted kind. (?x::Int#) => ty is now ruled out
       3. Implicit parameter constraints are now allowed in superclasses
          and instance contexts (this just falls out as OK with the new
          constraint solver)
      
      Internally the following major changes were made:
       1. There is now no PredTy in the Type data type. Instead
          GHC checks the kind of a type to figure out if it is a predicate
       2. There is now no AClass TyThing: we represent classes as TyThings
          just as a ATyCon (classes had TyCons anyway)
       3. What used to be (~) is now pretty-printed as (~#). The box
          constructor EqBox :: (a ~# b) -> (a ~ b)
       4. The type LCoercion is used internally in the constraint solver
          and type checker to represent coercions with free variables
          of type (a ~ b) rather than (a ~# b)
      9729fe7c
  14. 06 May, 2011 1 commit
  15. 04 May, 2011 2 commits
    • dreixel's avatar
      Remove HsNumTy and TypePati. · fed25228
      dreixel authored
      They belonged to the old generic deriving mechanism, so they can go. Adapted a lot of code as a consequence.
      fed25228
    • Simon Peyton Jones's avatar
      Final batch of monad-comprehension stuff · 3bb700d5
      Simon Peyton Jones authored
      * Do-notation in arrows is marked with HsStmtContext = ArrowExpr
      * tcMDoStmt (which was only used for arrows) is moved
        to TcArrows, and renamed tcArrDoStmt
      * Improved documentation in the user manual
      * Lots of other minor changes
      3bb700d5
  16. 19 Apr, 2011 1 commit
    • Simon Peyton Jones's avatar
      This BIG PATCH contains most of the work for the New Coercion Representation · fdf86568
      Simon Peyton Jones authored
      See the paper "Practical aspects of evidence based compilation in System FC"
      
      * Coercion becomes a data type, distinct from Type
      
      * Coercions become value-level things, rather than type-level things,
        (although the value is zero bits wide, like the State token)
        A consequence is that a coerion abstraction increases the arity by 1
        (just like a dictionary abstraction)
      
      * There is a new constructor in CoreExpr, namely Coercion, to inject
        coercions into terms
      fdf86568
  17. 12 Jan, 2011 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Major refactoring of the type inference engine · 27310213
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      This patch embodies many, many changes to the contraint solver, which
      make it simpler, more robust, and more beautiful.  But it has taken
      me ages to get right. The forcing issue was some obscure programs
      involving recursive dictionaries, but these eventually led to a
      massive refactoring sweep.
      
      Main changes are:
       * No more "frozen errors" in the monad.  Instead "insoluble
         constraints" are now part of the WantedConstraints type.
      
       * The WantedConstraint type is a product of bags, instead of (as
         before) a bag of sums.  This eliminates a good deal of tagging and
         untagging.
      
       * This same WantedConstraints data type is used
           - As the way that constraints are gathered
           - As a field of an implication constraint
           - As both argument and result of solveWanted
           - As the argument to reportUnsolved
      
       * We do not generate any evidence for Derived constraints. They are
         purely there to allow "impovement" by unifying unification
         variables.
      
       * In consequence, nothing is ever *rewritten* by a Derived
         constraint.  This removes, by construction, all the horrible
         potential recursive-dictionary loops that were making us tear our
         hair out.  No more isGoodRecEv search either. Hurrah!
      
       * We add the superclass Derived constraints during canonicalisation,
         after checking for duplicates.  So fewer superclass constraints
         are generated than before.
      
       * Skolem tc-tyvars no longer carry SkolemInfo.  Instead, the
         SkolemInfo lives in the GivenLoc of the Implication, where it
         can be tidied, zonked, and substituted nicely.  This alone is
         a major improvement.
      
       * Tidying is improved, so that we tend to get t1, t2, t3, rather
         than t1, t11, t111, etc
      
         Moreover, unification variables are always printed with a digit
         (thus a0, a1, etc), so that plain 'a' is available for a skolem
         arising from a type signature etc. In this way,
           (a) We quietly say which variables are unification variables,
               for those who know and care
           (b) Types tend to get printed as the user expects.  If he writes
                   f :: a -> a
                   f = ...blah...
               then types involving 'a' get printed with 'a', rather than
               some tidied variant.
      
       * There are significant improvements in error messages, notably
         in the "Cannot deduce X from Y" messages.
      27310213
  18. 05 Nov, 2010 1 commit
  19. 21 Oct, 2010 1 commit
  20. 08 Oct, 2010 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Beautiful new approach to the skolem-escape check and untouchable · debb7b80
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      Instead of keeping a *set* of untouchable variables in each
      implication contraints, we keep a *range* of uniques for the
      *touchable* variables of an implication.  This are precisely
      the ones we would call the "existentials" if we were French.
      
      It turns out that the code is more efficient, and vastly easier
      to get right, than the set-based approach.
      
      Fixes Trac #4355 among others
      debb7b80
  21. 24 Sep, 2010 1 commit
  22. 18 Sep, 2010 1 commit
  23. 13 Sep, 2010 1 commit
  24. 24 Jul, 2010 1 commit
  25. 06 May, 2010 1 commit
  26. 20 Aug, 2009 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Improvements to record puns, wildcards · d64022dc
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      * Make C { A.a } work with punning, expanding to C { A.a = a }
      
      * Make it so that, with -fwarn-unused-matches, 
              f (C {..}) = x
        does not complain about the bindings introduced by the "..".
      
      * Make -XRecordWildCards implies -XDisambiguateRecordFields.
      
      * Overall refactoring of RnPat, which had become very crufty. 
        In particular, there is now a monad, CpsRn, private to RnPat,
        which deals with the cps-style plumbing.  This is why so many
        lines of RnPat have changed.
      
      * Refactor the treatment of renaming of record fields into two passes
      	- rnHsRecFields1, used both for patterns and expressions,
      	     which expands puns, wild-cards
        	- a local renamer in RnPat for fields in patterns
      	- a local renamer in RnExpr for fields in construction and update
        This make it all MUCH easier to understand
       
      * Improve documentation of record puns, wildcards, and disambiguation
      d64022dc
  27. 24 Jul, 2009 1 commit
  28. 07 Jul, 2009 1 commit
  29. 01 Jul, 2009 1 commit
  30. 24 Apr, 2009 2 commits
  31. 04 Feb, 2009 1 commit
  32. 13 Jan, 2009 2 commits
  33. 30 Oct, 2008 1 commit
    • simonpj@microsoft.com's avatar
      Improve error reporting for non-rigid GADT matches · 259d5ea8
      simonpj@microsoft.com authored
      Following suggestions from users, this patch improves the error message
      when a GADT match needs a rigid type:
      
       tcfail172.hs:19:10:
           GADT pattern match in non-rigid context for `Nil'
      -      Solution: add a type signature
      +      Probable solution: add a type signature for `is_normal'
           In the pattern: Nil
           In the definition of `is_normal': is_normal Nil = True
      
      Now GHC tries to tell you what to give a type signature *for*.
      Thanks to Daniel Gorin and others for the suggestions.
      259d5ea8
  34. 20 Sep, 2008 1 commit
  35. 09 Oct, 2008 1 commit
  36. 01 Oct, 2008 1 commit