- 26 Sep, 2007 2 commits
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 25 Sep, 2007 7 commits
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 23 Sep, 2007 3 commits
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
- 21 Sep, 2007 2 commits
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
rl@cse.unsw.edu.au authored
This one actually generates completely bogus Core which doesn't pass CoreLint.
-
- 20 Sep, 2007 3 commits
- 19 Sep, 2007 5 commits
-
-
simonpj authored
-
simonpj authored
-
chak@cse.unsw.edu.au. authored
-
chak@cse.unsw.edu.au. authored
-
rl@cse.unsw.edu.au authored
This is actually a regression introduced by one of the recent patches. It used to work!
-
- 17 Sep, 2007 1 commit
-
-
Don Stewart authored
-
- 16 Sep, 2007 2 commits
-
-
Don Stewart authored
-
chak@cse.unsw.edu.au. authored
-
- 15 Sep, 2007 2 commits
-
-
chak@cse.unsw.edu.au. authored
-
chak@cse.unsw.edu.au. authored
- This test fails with the overhauled rewrite rules. This is (judging from -ddump-tc-trace) not because the new rules implementation goes wrong, but because the old implementation left out some improvement and hence passed this test by accident.
-
- 14 Sep, 2007 2 commits
- 13 Sep, 2007 8 commits
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
This is better than a top-level clean() when using threads
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 14 Sep, 2007 1 commit
-
-
rl@cse.unsw.edu.au authored
-
- 13 Sep, 2007 2 commits