- 15 Sep, 2006 5 commits
-
-
chak@cse.unsw.edu.au. authored
Thu Aug 3 19:29:38 EDT 2006 Manuel M T Chakravarty <chak@cse.unsw.edu.au> * Added error checks & fixed bugs
-
chak@cse.unsw.edu.au. authored
Tue Aug 1 14:10:39 EDT 2006 Manuel M T Chakravarty <chak@cse.unsw.edu.au> * Revised kind signatures
-
chak@cse.unsw.edu.au. authored
Mon Jul 31 17:20:56 EDT 2006 Manuel M T Chakravarty <chak@cse.unsw.edu.au> * Cleanup (re type function parsing)
-
chak@cse.unsw.edu.au. authored
Fri Jul 28 21:52:46 EDT 2006 Manuel M T Chakravarty <chak@cse.unsw.edu.au> * Parser support for assoc synonyms
-
chak@cse.unsw.edu.au. authored
Wed Jul 26 17:46:55 EDT 2006 Manuel M T Chakravarty <chak@cse.unsw.edu.au> * Migrate cvs diff from fptools-assoc branch - Syntactic support for associated types - Renamer support for associated types - ATs are only allowed with -fglasgow-exts - Handle ATs in the type and class declaration kinding knot-tying exercise
-
- 02 Aug, 2006 1 commit
-
-
chak@cse.unsw.edu.au. authored
-
- 18 Sep, 2006 1 commit
-
-
Markus Lauer authored
-
- 12 Sep, 2006 1 commit
-
-
audreyt@audreyt.org authored
-
- 21 Aug, 2006 2 commits
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 09 Aug, 2006 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
See #815
-
- 25 Jul, 2006 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
This patch pushes through one fundamental change: a module is now identified by the pair of its package and module name, whereas previously it was identified by its module name alone. This means that now a program can contain multiple modules with the same name, as long as they belong to different packages. This is a language change - the Haskell report says nothing about packages, but it is now necessary to understand packages in order to understand GHC's module system. For example, a type T from module M in package P is different from a type T from module M in package Q. Previously this wasn't an issue because there could only be a single module M in the program. The "module restriction" on combining packages has therefore been lifted, and a program can contain multiple versions of the same package. Note that none of the proposed syntax changes have yet been implemented, but the architecture is geared towards supporting import declarations qualified by package name, and that is probably the next step. It is now necessary to specify the package name when compiling a package, using the -package-name flag (which has been un-deprecated). Fortunately Cabal still uses -package-name. Certain packages are "wired in". Currently the wired-in packages are: base, haskell98, template-haskell and rts, and are always referred to by these versionless names. Other packages are referred to with full package IDs (eg. "network-1.0"). This is because the compiler needs to refer to entities in the wired-in packages, and we didn't want to bake the version of these packages into the comiler. It's conceivable that someone might want to upgrade the base package independently of GHC. Internal changes: - There are two module-related types: ModuleName just a FastString, the name of a module Module a pair of a PackageId and ModuleName A mapping from ModuleName can be a UniqFM, but a mapping from Module must be a FiniteMap (we provide it as ModuleEnv). - The "HomeModules" type that was passed around the compiler is now gone, replaced in most cases by the current package name which is contained in DynFlags. We can tell whether a Module comes from the current package by comparing its package name against the current package. - While I was here, I changed PrintUnqual to be a little more useful: it now returns the ModuleName that the identifier should be qualified with according to the current scope, rather than its original module. Also, PrintUnqual tells whether to qualify module names with package names (currently unused). Docs to follow.
-
- 23 Jun, 2006 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 19 May, 2006 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 14 Apr, 2006 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
Bulat pointed out that in Template Haskell $x is allowed instead of $(x) in expressions, but not at the top level of modules. This commit fixes the omission. Now you can say f x = x $h data T = T and the $h will run Template Haskell just as you'd expect.
-
- 07 Apr, 2006 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
Most of the other users of the fptools build system have migrated to Cabal, and with the move to darcs we can now flatten the source tree without losing history, so here goes. The main change is that the ghc/ subdir is gone, and most of what it contained is now at the top level. The build system now makes no pretense at being multi-project, it is just the GHC build system. No doubt this will break many things, and there will be a period of instability while we fix the dependencies. A straightforward build should work, but I haven't yet fixed binary/source distributions. Changes to the Building Guide will follow, too.
-
- 05 Mar, 2006 1 commit
-
-
David Himmelstrup authored
-
- 01 Mar, 2006 1 commit
-
-
David Himmelstrup authored
-
- 03 Feb, 2006 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This commit adds bang-patterns, enabled by -fglasgow-exts or -fbang-patterns diabled by -fno-bang-patterns The idea is described here http://haskell.galois.com/cgi-bin/haskell-prime/trac.cgi/wiki/BangPatterns
-
- 25 Jan, 2006 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This very large commit adds impredicativity to GHC, plus numerous other small things. *** WARNING: I have compiled all the libraries, and *** a stage-2 compiler, and everything seems *** fine. But don't grab this patch if you *** can't tolerate a hiccup if something is *** broken. The big picture is this: a) GHC handles impredicative polymorphism, as described in the "Boxy types: type inference for higher-rank types and impredicativity" paper b) GHC handles GADTs in the new simplified (and very sligtly less epxrssive) way described in the "Simple unification-based type inference for GADTs" paper But there are lots of smaller changes, and since it was pre-Darcs they are not individually recorded. Some things to watch out for: c) The story on lexically-scoped type variables has changed, as per my email. I append the story below for completeness, but I am still not happy with it, and it may change again. In particular, the new story does not allow a pattern-bound scoped type variable to be wobbly, so (\(x::[a]) -> ...) is usually rejected. This is more restrictive than before, and we might loosen up again. d) A consequence of adding impredicativity is that GHC is a bit less gung ho about converting automatically between (ty1 -> forall a. ty2) and (forall a. ty1 -> ty2) In particular, you may need to eta-expand some functions to make typechecking work again. Furthermore, functions are now invariant in their argument types, rather than being contravariant. Again, the main consequence is that you may occasionally need to eta-expand function arguments when using higher-rank polymorphism. Please test, and let me know of any hiccups Scoped type variables in GHC ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ January 2006 0) Terminology. A *pattern binding* is of the form pat = rhs A *function binding* is of the form f pat1 .. patn = rhs A binding of the formm var = rhs is treated as a (degenerate) *function binding*. A *declaration type signature* is a separate type signature for a let-bound or where-bound variable: f :: Int -> Int A *pattern type signature* is a signature in a pattern: \(x::a) -> x f (x::a) = x A *result type signature* is a signature on the result of a function definition: f :: forall a. [a] -> a head (x:xs) :: a = x The form x :: a = rhs is treated as a (degnerate) function binding with a result type signature, not as a pattern binding. 1) The main invariants: A) A lexically-scoped type variable always names a (rigid) type variable (not an arbitrary type). THIS IS A CHANGE. Previously, a scoped type variable named an arbitrary *type*. B) A type signature always describes a rigid type (since its free (scoped) type variables name rigid type variables). This is also a change, a consequence of (A). C) Distinct lexically-scoped type variables name distinct rigid type variables. This choice is open; 2) Scoping 2(a) If a declaration type signature has an explicit forall, those type variables are brought into scope in the right hand side of the corresponding binding (plus, for function bindings, the patterns on the LHS). f :: forall a. a -> [a] f (x::a) = [x :: a, x] Both occurences of 'a' in the second line are bound by the 'forall a' in the first line A declaration type signature *without* an explicit top-level forall is implicitly quantified over all the type variables that are mentioned in the type but not already in scope. GHC's current rule is that this implicit quantification does *not* bring into scope any new scoped type variables. f :: a -> a f x = ...('a' is not in scope here)... This gives compatibility with Haskell 98 2(b) A pattern type signature implicitly brings into scope any type variables mentioned in the type that are not already into scope. These are called *pattern-bound type variables*. g :: a -> a -> [a] g (x::a) (y::a) = [y :: a, x] The pattern type signature (x::a) brings 'a' into scope. The 'a' in the pattern (y::a) is bound, as is the occurrence on the RHS. A pattern type siganture is the only way you can bring existentials into scope. data T where MkT :: forall a. a -> (a->Int) -> T f x = case x of MkT (x::a) f -> f (x::a) 2a) QUESTION class C a where op :: forall b. b->a->a instance C (T p q) where op = <rhs> Clearly p,q are in scope in <rhs>, but is 'b'? Not at the moment. Nor can you add a type signature for op in the instance decl. You'd have to say this: instance C (T p q) where op = let op' :: forall b. ... op' = <rhs> in op' 3) A pattern-bound type variable is allowed only if the pattern's expected type is rigid. Otherwise we don't know exactly *which* skolem the scoped type variable should be bound to, and that means we can't do GADT refinement. This is invariant (A), and it is a big change from the current situation. f (x::a) = x -- NO; pattern type is wobbly g1 :: b -> b g1 (x::b) = x -- YES, because the pattern type is rigid g2 :: b -> b g2 (x::c) = x -- YES, same reason h :: forall b. b -> b h (x::b) = x -- YES, but the inner b is bound k :: forall b. b -> b k (x::c) = x -- NO, it can't be both b and c 3a) You cannot give different names for the same type variable in the same scope (Invariant (C)): f1 :: p -> p -> p -- NO; because 'a' and 'b' would be f1 (x::a) (y::b) = (x::a) -- bound to the same type variable f2 :: p -> p -> p -- OK; 'a' is bound to the type variable f2 (x::a) (y::a) = (x::a) -- over which f2 is quantified -- NB: 'p' is not lexically scoped f3 :: forall p. p -> p -> p -- NO: 'p' is now scoped, and is bound to f3 (x::a) (y::a) = (x::a) -- to the same type varialble as 'a' f4 :: forall p. p -> p -> p -- OK: 'p' is now scoped, and its occurences f4 (x::p) (y::p) = (x::p) -- in the patterns are bound by the forall 3b) You can give a different name to the same type variable in different disjoint scopes, just as you can (if you want) give diferent names to the same value parameter g :: a -> Bool -> Maybe a g (x::p) True = Just x :: Maybe p g (y::q) False = Nothing :: Maybe q 3c) Scoped type variables respect alpha renaming. For example, function f2 from (3a) above could also be written: f2' :: p -> p -> p f2' (x::b) (y::b) = x::b where the scoped type variable is called 'b' instead of 'a'. 4) Result type signatures obey the same rules as pattern types signatures. In particular, they can bind a type variable only if the result type is rigid f x :: a = x -- NO g :: b -> b g x :: b = x -- YES; binds b in rhs 5) A *pattern type signature* in a *pattern binding* cannot bind a scoped type variable (x::a, y) = ... -- Legal only if 'a' is already in scope Reason: in type checking, the "expected type" of the LHS pattern is always wobbly, so we can't bind a rigid type variable. (The exception would be for an existential type variable, but existentials are not allowed in pattern bindings either.) Even this is illegal f :: forall a. a -> a f x = let ((y::b)::a, z) = ... in Here it looks as if 'b' might get a rigid binding; but you can't bind it to the same skolem as a. 6) Explicitly-forall'd type variables in the *declaration type signature(s)* for a *pattern binding* do not scope AT ALL. x :: forall a. a->a -- NO; the forall a does Just (x::a->a) = Just id -- not scope at all y :: forall a. a->a Just y = Just (id :: a->a) -- NO; same reason THIS IS A CHANGE, but one I bet that very few people will notice. Here's why: strange :: forall b. (b->b,b->b) strange = (id,id) x1 :: forall a. a->a y1 :: forall b. b->b (x1,y1) = strange This is legal Haskell 98 (modulo the forall). If both 'a' and 'b' both scoped over the RHS, they'd get unified and so cannot stand for distinct type variables. One could *imagine* allowing this: x2 :: forall a. a->a y2 :: forall a. a->a (x2,y2) = strange using the very same type variable 'a' in both signatures, so that a single 'a' scopes over the RHS. That seems defensible, but odd, because though there are two type signatures, they introduce just *one* scoped type variable, a. 7) Possible extension. We might consider allowing \(x :: [ _ ]) -> <expr> where "_" is a wild card, to mean "x has type list of something", without naming the something.
-
- 06 Jan, 2006 1 commit
-
-
simonmar authored
Add support for UTF-8 source files GHC finally has support for full Unicode in source files. Source files are now assumed to be UTF-8 encoded, and the full range of Unicode characters can be used, with classifications recognised using the implementation from Data.Char. This incedentally means that only the stage2 compiler will recognise Unicode in source files, because I was too lazy to port the unicode classifier code into libcompat. Additionally, the following synonyms for keywords are now recognised: forall symbol (U+2200) forall right arrow (U+2192) -> left arrow (U+2190) <- horizontal ellipsis (U+22EF) .. there are probably more things we could add here. This will break some source files if Latin-1 characters are being used. In most cases this should result in a UTF-8 decoding error. Later on if we want to support more encodings (perhaps with a pragma to specify the encoding), I plan to do it by recoding into UTF-8 before parsing. Internally, there were some pretty big changes: - FastStrings are now stored in UTF-8 - Z-encoding has been moved right to the back end. Previously we used to Z-encode every identifier on the way in for simplicity, and only decode when we needed to show something to the user. Instead, we now keep every string in its UTF-8 encoding, and Z-encode right before printing it out. To avoid Z-encoding the same string multiple times, the Z-encoding is cached inside the FastString the first time it is requested. This speeds up the compiler - I've measured some definite improvement in parsing at least, and I expect compilations overall to be faster too. It also cleans up a lot of cruft from the OccName interface. Z-encoding is nicely hidden inside the Outputable instance for Names & OccNames now. - StringBuffers are UTF-8 too, and are now represented as ForeignPtrs. - I've put together some test cases, not by any means exhaustive, but there are some interesting UTF-8 decoding error cases that aren't obvious. Also, take a look at unicode001.hs for a demo.
-
- 16 Nov, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
Better error reporting for newtypes with too many constructors, or too many fields. Instead of yielding a parse error, we parse it like a data type declaration, and give a comprehensible error message later. A suggestion from Jan-Willem.
-
- 12 Nov, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
Better TH -> HsSyn conversion Merge to stable (attempt) This commit monad-ises the TH syntax -> HS syntax conversion. This means that error messages can be reported in a more civilised way. It also ensures that the entire structure is converted eagerly. That means that any exceptions buried inside it are triggered during conversion, and caught by the exception handler in TcSplice. Before, they could be triggered later, and looked like comiler crashes.
-
- 31 Oct, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
Wibble to: "Add a new pragma: SPECIALISE INLINE" I messed up the way that NOINLINE is parsed; this commit fixes it.
-
- 27 Oct, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
Add a new pragma: SPECIALISE INLINE This amounts to adding an INLINE pragma to the specialised version of the function. You can add phase stuff too (SPECIALISE INLINE [2]), and NOINLINE instead of INLINE. The reason for doing this is to support inlining of type-directed recursive functions. The main example is this: -- non-uniform array type data Arr e where ArrInt :: !Int -> ByteArray# -> Arr Int ArrPair :: !Int -> Arr e1 -> Arr e2 -> Arr (e1, e2) (!:) :: Arr e -> Int -> e {-# SPECIALISE INLINE (!:) :: Arr Int -> Int -> Int #-} {-# SPECIALISE INLINE (!:) :: Arr (a, b) -> Int -> (a, b) #-} ArrInt _ ba !: (I# i) = I# (indexIntArray# ba i) ArrPair _ a1 a2 !: i = (a1 !: i, a2 !: i) If we use (!:) at a particular array type, we want to inline (:!), which is recursive, until all the type specialisation is done. On the way I did a bit of renaming and tidying of the way that pragmas are carried, so quite a lot of files are touched in a fairly trivial way.
-
- 14 Oct, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
Add record syntax for GADTs ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Atrijus Tang wanted to add record syntax for GADTs and existential types, so he and I worked on it a bit at ICFP. This commit is the result. Now you can say data T a where T1 { x :: a } :: T [a] T2 { x :: a, y :: Int } :: T [a] forall b. Show b => T3 { naughty :: b, ok :: Int } :: T Int T4 :: Eq a => a -> b -> T (a,b) Here the constructors are declared using record syntax. Still to come after this commit: - User manual documentation - More regression tests - Some missing cases in the parser (e.g. T3 won't parse) Autrijus is going to do these. Here's a quick summary of the rules. (Atrijus is going to write proper documentation shortly.) Defnition: a 'vanilla' constructor has a type of the form forall a1..an. t1 -> ... -> tm -> T a1 ... an No existentials, no context, nothing. A constructor declared with Haskell-98 syntax is vanilla by construction. A constructor declared with GADT-style syntax is vanilla iff its type looks like the above. (In the latter case, the order of the type variables does not matter.) * You can mix record syntax and non-record syntax in a single decl * All constructors that share a common field 'x' must have the same result type (T [a] in the example). * You can use field names without restriction in record construction and record pattern matching. * Record *update* only works for data types that only have 'vanilla' constructors. * Consider the field 'naughty', which uses a type variable that does not appear in the result type ('b' in the example). You can use the field 'naughty' in pattern matching and construction, but NO SELECTOR function is generated for 'naughty'. [An attempt to use 'naughty' as a selector function will elicit a helpful error message.] * Data types declared in GADT syntax cannot have a context. So this is illegal: data (Monad m) => T a where .... * Constructors in GADT syntax can have a context (t.g. T3, T4 above) and that context is stored in the constructor and made available when the constructor is pattern-matched on. WARNING: not competely implemented yet, but that's the plan. Implementation notes ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - Data constructors (even vanilla ones) no longer share the type variables of their parent type constructor. - HsDecls.ConDecl has changed quite a bit - TyCons don't record the field labels and type any more (doesn't make sense for existential fields) - GlobalIdDetails records which selectors are 'naughty', and hence don't have real code.
-
- 06 Oct, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonmar authored
remove old comment From: Autrijus Tang <autrijus@autrijus.org>
-
- 21 Jul, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
Arrange that a 'deriving' clause works for a GADT-syntax data type delaration, provided it declares a Haskell-98-style data type (i.e. no existentials or GADT stuff). This just allows you to use a different syntax for data type declarations without losing 'deriving'. A couple of people requested this, and it's really easy to do.
-
- 19 Jul, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
WARNING: this is a big commit. You might want to wait a few days before updating, in case I've broken something. However, if any of the changes are what you wanted, please check it out and test! This commit does three main things: 1. A re-organisation of the way that GHC handles bindings in HsSyn. This has been a bit of a mess for quite a while. The key new types are -- Bindings for a let or where clause data HsLocalBinds id = HsValBinds (HsValBinds id) | HsIPBinds (HsIPBinds id) | EmptyLocalBinds -- Value bindings (not implicit parameters) data HsValBinds id = ValBindsIn -- Before typechecking (LHsBinds id) [LSig id] -- Not dependency analysed -- Recursive by default | ValBindsOut -- After typechecking [(RecFlag, LHsBinds id)]-- Dependency analysed 2. Implement Mark Jones's idea of increasing polymoprhism by using type signatures to cut the strongly-connected components of a recursive group. As a consequence, GHC no longer insists on the contexts of the type signatures of a recursive group being identical. This drove a significant change: the renamer no longer does dependency analysis. Instead, it attaches a free-variable set to each binding, so that the type checker can do the dep anal. Reason: the typechecker needs to do *two* analyses: one to find the true mutually-recursive groups (which we need so we can build the right CoreSyn) one to find the groups in which to typecheck, taking account of type signatures 3. Implement non-ground SPECIALISE pragmas, as promised, and as requested by Remi and Ross. Certainly, this should fix the current problem with GHC, namely that if you have g :: Eq a => a -> b -> b then you can now specialise thus SPECIALISE g :: Int -> b -> b (This didn't use to work.) However, it goes further than that. For example: f :: (Eq a, Ix b) => a -> b -> b then you can make a partial specialisation SPECIALISE f :: (Eq a) => a -> Int -> Int In principle, you can specialise f to *any* type that is "less polymorphic" (in the sense of subsumption) than f's actual type. Such as SPECIALISE f :: Eq a => [a] -> Int -> Int But I haven't tested that. I implemented this by doing the specialisation in the typechecker and desugarer, rather than leaving around the strange SpecPragmaIds, for the specialiser to find. Indeed, SpecPragmaIds have vanished altogether (hooray). Pragmas in general are handled more tidily. There's a new data type HsBinds.Prag, which lives in an AbsBinds, and carries pragma info from the typechecker to the desugarer. Smaller things - The loop in the renamer goes via RnExpr, instead of RnSource. (That makes it more like the type checker.) - I fixed the thing that was causing 'check_tc' warnings to be emitted.
-
- 05 May, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
Make it so that you can deprecate a data constructor. Previously {-# DEPRECATED T "no" #-} referred only to the type or class T. Now it refers to the data constructor T as well, just like in fixity declarations. There's no way to deprecate the data constructor T without also deprecating the type T, alas. Same problem in fixity decls. Main problem is coming up with a suitable concrete syntax to do so. We could consider merging this to the STABLE branch. NB: Sven, the manual fixes are not XML-valideated! I'm at home.
-
- 04 Apr, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
This commit combines three overlapping things: 1. Make rebindable syntax work for do-notation. The idea here is that, in particular, (>>=) can have a type that has class constraints on its argument types, e.g. (>>=) :: (Foo m, Baz a) => m a -> (a -> m b) -> m b The consequence is that a BindStmt and ExprStmt must have individual evidence attached -- previously it was one batch of evidence for the entire Do Sadly, we can't do this for MDo, because we use bind at a polymorphic type (to tie the knot), so we still use one blob of evidence (now in the HsStmtContext) for MDo. For arrow syntax, the evidence is in the HsCmd. For list comprehensions, it's all built-in anyway. So the evidence on a BindStmt is only used for ordinary do-notation. 2. Tidy up HsSyn. In particular: - Eliminate a few "Out" forms, which we can manage without (e.g. - It ought to be the case that the type checker only decorates the syntax tree, but doesn't change one construct into another. That wasn't true for NPat, LitPat, NPlusKPat, so I've fixed that. - Eliminate ResultStmts from Stmt. They always had to be the last Stmt, which led to awkward pattern matching in some places; and the benefits didn't seem to outweigh the costs. Now each construct that uses [Stmt] has a result expression too (e.g. GRHS). 3. Make 'deriving( Ix )' generate a binding for unsafeIndex, rather than for index. This is loads more efficient. (This item only affects TcGenDeriv, but some of point (2) also affects TcGenDeriv, so it has to be in one commit.)
-
- 18 Mar, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonmar authored
Flags cleanup. Basically the purpose of this commit is to move more of the compiler's global state into DynFlags, which is moving in the direction we need to go for the GHC API which can have multiple active sessions supported by a single GHC instance. Before: $ grep 'global_var' */*hs | wc -l 78 After: $ grep 'global_var' */*hs | wc -l 27 Well, it's an improvement. Most of what's left won't really affect our ability to host multiple sessions. Lots of static flags have become dynamic flags (yay!). Notably lots of flags that we used to think of as "driver" flags, like -I and -L, are now dynamic. The most notable static flags left behind are the "way" flags, eg. -prof. It would be nice to fix this, but it isn't urgent. On the way, lots of cleanup has happened. Everything related to static and dynamic flags lives in StaticFlags and DynFlags respectively, and they share a common command-line parser library in CmdLineParser. The flags related to modes (--makde, --interactive etc.) are now private to the front end: in fact private to Main itself, for now.
-
- 10 Mar, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
Wibbles to infix operators; please merge
-
- 09 Mar, 2005 2 commits
- 23 Feb, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
--------------------------------------------- Make type synonyms uniform with data types so far as infix operators are concerned --------------------------------------------- Merge to STABLE This allows type (a :+: b) c d = ... which was prevented before by accident. I've also documented the fact that classes can be infix; and arranged that class constraints in types can be in infix form. f :: (a :=: b) => ....
-
- 27 Jan, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
-------------------------------------------- Replace hi-boot files with hs-boot files -------------------------------------------- This major commit completely re-organises the way that recursive modules are dealt with. * It should have NO EFFECT if you do not use recursive modules * It is a BREAKING CHANGE if you do ====== Warning: .hi-file format has changed, so if you are ====== updating into an existing HEAD build, you'll ====== need to make clean and re-make The details: [documentation still to be done] * Recursive loops are now broken with Foo.hs-boot (or Foo.lhs-boot), not Foo.hi-boot * An hs-boot files is a proper source file. It is compiled just like a regular Haskell source file: ghc Foo.hs generates Foo.hi, Foo.o ghc Foo.hs-boot generates Foo.hi-boot, Foo.o-boot * hs-boot files are precisely a subset of Haskell. In particular: - they have the same import, export, and scoping rules - errors (such as kind errors) in hs-boot files are checked You do *not* need to mention the "original" name of something in an hs-boot file, any more than you do in any other Haskell module. * The Foo.hi-boot file generated by compiling Foo.hs-boot is a machine- generated interface file, in precisely the same format as Foo.hi * When compiling Foo.hs, its exports are checked for compatibility with Foo.hi-boot (previously generated by compiling Foo.hs-boot) * The dependency analyser (ghc -M) knows about Foo.hs-boot files, and generates appropriate dependencies. For regular source files it generates Foo.o : Foo.hs Foo.o : Baz.hi -- Foo.hs imports Baz Foo.o : Bog.hi-boot -- Foo.hs source-imports Bog For a hs-boot file it generates similar dependencies Bog.o-boot : Bog.hs-boot Bog.o-boot : Nib.hi -- Bog.hs-boto imports Nib * ghc -M is also enhanced to use the compilation manager dependency chasing, so that ghc -M Main will usually do the job. No need to enumerate all the source files. * The -c flag is no longer a "compiler mode". It simply means "omit the link step", and synonymous with -no-link.
-
- 18 Jan, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
------------------------ Reorganisation of hi-boot files ------------------------ The main point of this commit is to arrange that in the Compilation Manager's dependendency graph, hi-boot files are proper nodes. This is important to make sure that we compile everything in the right order. It's a step towards hs-boot files. * The fundamental change is that CompManager.ModSummary has a new field, ms_boot :: IsBootInterface I also tided up CompManager a bit. No change to the Basic Plan. ModSummary is now exported abstractly from CompManager (was concrete) * Hi-boot files now have import declarations. The idea is they are compulsory, so that the dependency analyser can find them * I changed an invariant: the Compilation Manager used to ensure that hscMain was given a HomePackageTable only for the modules 'below' the one being compiled. This was really only important for instances and rules, and it was a bit inconvenient. So I moved the filter to the compiler itself: see HscTypes.hptInstances and hptRules. * Module Packages.hs now defines data PackageIdH = HomePackage -- The "home" package is the package -- curently being compiled | ExtPackage PackageId -- An "external" package is any other package It was just a Maybe type before, so this makes it a bit clearer. * I tried to add a bit better location info to the IfM monad, so that errors in interfaces come with a slightly more helpful error message. See the if_loc field in TcRnTypes --- and follow-on consequences * Changed Either to Maybes.MaybeErr in a couple of places (more perspicuous)
-
- 14 Jan, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonmar authored
HEADS UP! You now need to use an up to date Happy from CVS to build GHC. Happy version 1.15 will be released shortly. Replace the slow hacked up String-based GetImports with one based on the real Haskell parser. This requires a new addition to Happy to support parsing partial files. We now avoid reading each source file off the disk twice: once to get its module name and imports, and again to parse it. Instead we just slurp it once, and cache the StringBuffer. This should result in improved startup times for ghc --make, especially when there are lots of source files.
-
- 05 Jan, 2005 1 commit
-
-
simonpj authored
Allow trailing semicolon in GADT constructor list
-