- 25 Oct, 2017 9 commits
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
Joachim Breitner authored
I.e. instead of .. ghc-flag:: -XUnboxedTuples :shortdesc: Enable the use of unboxed tuple syntax. :type: dynamic :reverse: -XNoUnboxedTuples :category: one simply writes .. extension:: UnboxedTuples :shortdesc: Enable the use of unboxed tuple syntax. This allows language extensions to be referenced as If :extension:`UnboxedTuples` is enabled, then... This directive still creates the entries for the `-XUnboxedTuples` flag, so in particular, Set :ghc-flag:`-XUnboxedTuples` if you have to. still works, and lists of flags in general (e.g. for the manpage) include these. I also removed lots of links from the shortdesc of the extensions, when this link simply points to the section where the extension is defined. I removed the list of `-X` flags from the flag reference table, but added a table of extension under “10.1. Language options” Lots of text in the manual now refers to “extension `Foo`” rather than “flag `-XFoo`”. I consider `-XFoo` a historic artifact that stems from when language extensions were really just flags. These days, the use of `-XFoo` is (IMHO) deprecated: You should be using `LANGUAGE Foo`, or maybe the appropriate field in a `.cabal` file. See 9278994a which did this change to error messages already. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4112
-
Tamar Christina authored
This reverts commit 561bdca1. submodule
-
Tamar Christina authored
This reverts commit f744261a.
-
Tamar Christina authored
-
Tamar Christina authored
Summary: Update to Win32 2.6 which is the expected version release for 8.4 This bumps the required submodule s as well. Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: austin, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4117
-
Tamar Christina authored
This reverts commit b62097d1.
-
Tamar Christina authored
Summary: GHC 8.4 is expected to ship with an updated GCC bindist based on GCC 7.2. I am however at this time not updating the crt due to an issue introduced in september. https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mailman/message/36085637/ Unless a favorable fix comes out of the discussion I will just ship the old crt with GHC 8.4. Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: austin, bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4119
-
Tom Sydney Kerckhove authored
Summary: This removes the part of the test that checks whether the timeout happened in a 'reasonable' amount of time, because it is flaky. In subsequent work, we can turn this into a benchmark. Test Plan: This _is_ a test Reviewers: nh2, bgamari, Phyx, austin, hvr Reviewed By: Phyx Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie GHC Trac Issues: #8684 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4120
-
- 24 Oct, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
Summary: Otherwise we can get an iface hash difference, but no indication of what caused it in the --show-iface output. Test Plan: Harbourmaster Reviewers: austin, bgamari, erikd Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4115
-
Joachim Breitner authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This fix replaces an utterly bogus error message with a decent one, rejecting a pattern synonym with a list pattern and rebindable syntax. Not hard to fix properly, but I'm going to wait for a willing volunteer and/or more user pressure.
-
- 23 Oct, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Joachim Breitner authored
-
Joachim Breitner authored
-
Joachim Breitner authored
-
- 22 Oct, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Tamar Christina authored
Summary: This patch adds the ability to generate stack traces on crashes for Windows. When running in the interpreter this attempts to use symbol information from the interpreter and information we know about the loaded object files to resolve addresses to symbols. When running compiled it doesn't have this information and then defaults to using symbol information from PDB files. Which for now means only files compiled with ICC or MSVC will show traces compiled. But I have a future patch that may address this shortcoming. Also since I don't know how to walk a pure haskell stack, I can for now only show the last entry. I'm hoping to figure out how Apply.cmm works to be able to walk the stalk and give more entries for pure haskell code. In GHCi ``` $ echo main | inplace/bin/ghc-stage2.exe --interactive ./testsuite/tests/rts/derefnull.hs GHCi, version 8.3.20170830: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help Ok, 1 module loaded. Prelude Main> Access violation in generated code when reading 0x0 Attempting to reconstruct a stack trace... Frame Code address * 0x77cde10 0xc370229 E:\..\base\dist-install\build\HSbase-4.10.0.0.o+0x190031 (base_ForeignziStorable_zdfStorableInt4_info+0x3f) ``` and compiled ``` Access violation in generated code when reading 0x0 Attempting to reconstruct a stack trace... Frame Code address * 0xf0dbd0 0x40bb01 E:\..\rts\derefnull.run\derefnull.exe+0xbb01 ``` Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: austin, hvr, bgamari, erikd, simonmar Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3913
-
- 20 Oct, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This patch clarifies the story for record wildcards, following the discussion on Trac #14347.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This patch was provoked by Trac #14363. Turned out that we were kicking out too many constraints in TcSMonad.kickOutRewritable, and that mean that the work-list never became empty: infinite loop! That in turn made me look harder at the Main Theorem in Note [Extending the inert equalities]. Main changes * Replace TcType.isTyVarExposed by TcType.isTyVarHead. The over-agressive isTyVarExposed is what caused Trac #14363. See Note [K3: completeness of solving] in TcSMonad. * TcType.Make anyRewriteableTyVar role-aware. In particular, a ~R ty cannot rewrite b ~R f a See Note [anyRewriteableTyVar must be role-aware]. That means it has to be given a role argument, which forces a little refactoring. I think this change is fixing a bug that hasn't yet been reported. The actual reported bug is handled by the previous bullet. But this change is definitely the Right Thing The main changes are in TcSMonad.kick_out_rewritable, and in TcType (isTyVarExposed ---> isTyVarHead). I did a little unforced refactoring: * Use the cc_eq_rel field of a CTyEqCan when it is available, rather than recomputing it. * Define eqCanRewrite :: EqRel -> EqRel -> EqRel, and use it, instead of duplicating its logic
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
- 19 Oct, 2017 13 commits
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
Jessica Clarke authored
If the AP_STACK has been evaluated and a GC has run, the BLACKHOLE indirection will have been removed, and the StablePtr for the original AP_STACK referred to be GHCi will therefore now point directly to the value, and may be tagged. Add a hist002 test for this, and make sure hist001 doesn't do an idle GC, so the case when it's still a BLACKHOLE is definitely also tested. Reviewers: austin, bgamari, erikd, simonmar Reviewed By: simonmar Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4099
-
Edward Z. Yang authored
Test Plan: none Reviewers: bgamari, austin, hvr Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4081
-
Tom Sydney Kerckhove authored
This is the first in a series of regression tests prompted by https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8684 and D4011, D4012, D4041 Test Plan: This _is_ a test. Reviewers: nh2, austin, hvr, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie GHC Trac Issues: #8684 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4074
-
Mr Kerckhove authored
This diff exposes the monotonic time api from GHC.Event.Clock. This is necessary for future work on regression tests (#D4074) for the timeout problems (8684, for example) in #D4041, #D4011, #D4012 Test Plan: Still builds ... Reviewers: nh2, bgamari, austin, hvr Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4079
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
Joachim Breitner authored
so now “7.6.12. Language options” only lists `-X` flags, as it should.
-
Ryan Scott authored
Summary: I ended up needing to use the functionality of `injectiveVarsOfBinder`/`injectiveVarsOfType` in this Haddock PR (https://github.com/haskell/haddock/pull/681), but alas, neither of these functions were exported. Let's do so. Test Plan: Does it compile? Reviewers: austin, goldfire, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4107
-
Ryan Scott authored
Summary: Previously, GHC would always raise the possibility that a type family might not be injective in certain error messages, even if that type family actually //was// injective. Fix this by actually checking for a type family's lack of injectivity before emitting such an error message. Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: goldfire, austin, bgamari, simonpj Reviewed By: simonpj Subscribers: simonpj, rwbarton, thomie GHC Trac Issues: #14369 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4106
-
Ryan Scott authored
Summary: According to the GHC users' guide, one cannot derive instances for data types in `.hs-boot` files. However, GHC was not enforcing this in practice, which led to #14365. Fix this by actually throwing an error if a derived instance is detected in an `.hs-boot` file (and recommend how to fix it in the error message.) Test Plan: make test TEST=T14365 Reviewers: ezyang, austin, bgamari, simonpj Reviewed By: simonpj Subscribers: simonpj, rwbarton, thomie GHC Trac Issues: #14365 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4102
-
Ryan Scott authored
Summary: It's well known that `-XRebindableSyntax` doesn't play nicely with some of the internal expressions that GHCi runs. #13385 was one example where this problem arose, which was fixed at the time by simply avoiding the use of `do`-notation in these internal GHCi expressions. That seemed to work, but it was a technique that proved not to scale, as #14342 demonstrated //another// example where `-XRebindableSyntax` can bite. Instead of delicately arranging the internal GHCi expressions to avoid anything that might be covered under `-XRebindableSyntax`, this patch takes the much more direct approach of disabling `-XRebindableSyntax` entirely when running any internal GHCi expression. This shouldn't hurt, since nothing internal to GHCi was taking advantage of the extension in the first place, and moreover, we can have greater confidence that some other obscure `-XRebindableSyntax` corner case won't pop up in the future. As an added bonus, this lets us once again use `do`-notation in the code that had to be changed when #13385 was (hackily) fixed before. Test Plan: make test TEST=T14342 Reviewers: bgamari, austin Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie GHC Trac Issues: #14342 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4086
-
Ryan Scott authored
-
- 18 Oct, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Gabor Greif authored
-
Gabor Greif authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This patch adds a bit of extra solving power for representational equality constraints to fix Trac #14333 The main changes: * Fix a buglet in TcType.isInsolubleOccursCheck which wrongly reported a definite occurs-check error for (a ~R# b a) * Get rid of TcSMonad.emitInsolubles. It had an ad-hoc duplicate-removal piece that is better handled in interactIrred, now that insolubles are Irreds. We need a little care to keep inert_count (which does not include insolubles) accurate. * Refactor TcInteract.solveOneFromTheOther, to return a much simpler type. It was just over-complicated before. * Make TcInteract.interactIrred look for constraints that match either way around, in TcInteract.findMatchingIrreds This wasn't hard and it cleaned up quite a bit of code.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Trac #13450 went bananas if we expand insoluble constraints. Better just to leave them un-expanded. I'm not sure in detail about why it goes so badly wrong; but regardless, the less we mess around with insoluble contraints the better the error messages will be.
-
- 17 Oct, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Joachim Breitner authored
In particular: * add an intro to “10.6. Extensions to the “deriving” mechanism” giving an overview, * make the various sections on `-XDerivingFoo` subsections of “10.6.3. Deriving instances of extra classes (Data, etc.)” * Move the reference anchors for the various `DerivingFoo` extensions to a more appropriate spot. * Add subsection “10.6.6.1. Default deriving strategy” to the deriving section (#14357)
-
Gabor Greif authored
-
Gabor Greif authored
-