1. 13 Jan, 2008 1 commit
  2. 04 Sep, 2007 1 commit
  3. 03 Sep, 2007 1 commit
  4. 01 Sep, 2007 1 commit
  5. 14 Nov, 2006 1 commit
  6. 11 Oct, 2006 1 commit
  7. 07 Apr, 2006 1 commit
    • Simon Marlow's avatar
      Reorganisation of the source tree · 0065d5ab
      Simon Marlow authored
      Most of the other users of the fptools build system have migrated to
      Cabal, and with the move to darcs we can now flatten the source tree
      without losing history, so here goes.
      
      The main change is that the ghc/ subdir is gone, and most of what it
      contained is now at the top level.  The build system now makes no
      pretense at being multi-project, it is just the GHC build system.
      
      No doubt this will break many things, and there will be a period of
      instability while we fix the dependencies.  A straightforward build
      should work, but I haven't yet fixed binary/source distributions.
      Changes to the Building Guide will follow, too.
      0065d5ab
  8. 26 Sep, 2001 1 commit
    • simonpj's avatar
      [project @ 2001-09-26 15:12:33 by simonpj] · e0d750be
      simonpj authored
      ------------------
      		Simon's big commit
      		------------------
      
      This commit, which I don't think I can sensibly do piecemeal, consists
      of the things I've been doing recently, mainly directed at making
      Manuel, George, and Marcin happier with RULES.
      
      
      Reogranise the simplifier
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      1. The simplifier's environment is now an explicit parameter.  This
      makes it a bit easier to figure out where it is going.
      
      2. Constructor arguments can now be arbitrary expressions, except
      when the application is the RHS of a let(rec).  This makes it much
      easier to match rules like
      
      	RULES
      	    "foo"  f (h x, g y) = f' x y
      
      In the simplifier, it's Simplify.mkAtomicArgs that ANF-ises a
      constructor application where necessary.  In the occurrence analyser,
      there's a new piece of context info (OccEncl) to say whether a
      constructor app is in a place where it should be in ANF.  (Unless
      it knows this it'll give occurrence info which will inline the
      argument back into the constructor app.)
      
      3. I'm experimenting with doing the "float-past big lambda" transformation
      in the full laziness pass, rather than mixed in with the simplifier (was
      tryRhsTyLam).
      
      4.  Arrange that
      	case (coerce (S,T) (x,y)) of ...
      will simplify.  Previous it didn't.
      A local change to CoreUtils.exprIsConApp_maybe.
      
      5. Do a better job in CoreUtils.exprEtaExpandArity when there's an
      error function in one branch.
      
      
      Phase numbers, RULES, and INLINE pragmas
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      1.  Phase numbers decrease from N towards zero (instead of increasing).
      This makes it easier to add new earlier phases, which is what users want
      to do.
      
      2.  RULES get their own phase number, N, and are disabled in phases before N.
      
      e.g. 	{-# RULES "foo" [2] forall x y.  f (x,y) = f' x y #-}
      
      Note the [2], which says "only active in phase 2 and later".
      
      3.  INLINE and NOINLINE pragmas have a phase number to.  This is now treated
      in just the same way as the phase number on RULE; that is, the Id is not inlined
      in phases earlier than N.  In phase N and later the Id *may* be inlined, and
      here is where INLINE and NOINLINE differ: INLNE makes the RHS look small, so
      as soon as it *may* be inlined it probably *will* be inlined.
      
      The syntax of the phase number on an INLINE/NOINLINE pragma has changed to be
      like the RULES case (i.e. in square brackets).  This should also make sure
      you examine all such phase numbers; many will need to change now the numbering
      is reversed.
      
      Inlining Ids is no longer affected at all by whether the Id appears on the
      LHS of a rule.  Now it's up to the programmer to put a suitable INLINE/NOINLINE
      pragma to stop it being inlined too early.
      
      
      Implementation notes:
      
      *  A new data type, BasicTypes.Activation says when a rule or inline pragma
      is active.   Functions isAlwaysActive, isNeverActive, isActive, do the
      obvious thing (all in BasicTypes).
      
      * Slight change in the SimplifierSwitch data type, which led to a lot of
      simplifier-specific code moving from CmdLineOpts to SimplMonad; a Good Thing.
      
      * The InlinePragma in the IdInfo of an Id is now simply an Activation saying
      when the Id can be inlined.  (It used to be a rather bizarre pair of a
      Bool and a (Maybe Phase), so this is much much easier to understand.)
      
      * The simplifier has a "mode" environment switch, replacing the old
      black list.  Unfortunately the data type decl has to be in
      CmdLineOpts, because it's an argument to the CoreDoSimplify switch
      
          data SimplifierMode = SimplGently | SimplPhase Int
      
      Here "gently" means "no rules, no inlining".   All the crucial
      inlining decisions are now collected together in SimplMonad
      (preInlineUnconditionally, postInlineUnconditionally, activeInline,
      activeRule).
      
      
      Specialisation
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      1.  Only dictionary *functions* are made INLINE, not dictionaries that
      have no parameters.  (This inline-dictionary-function thing is Marcin's
      idea and I'm still not sure whether it's a good idea.  But it's definitely
      a Bad Idea when there are no arguments.)
      
      2.  Be prepared to specialise an INLINE function: an easy fix in
      Specialise.lhs
      
      But there is still a problem, which is that the INLINE wins
      at the call site, so we don't use the specialised version anyway.
      I'm still unsure whether it makes sense to SPECIALISE something
      you want to INLINE.
      
      
      
      
      
      Random smaller things
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      
      * builtinRules (there was only one, but may be more) in PrelRules are now
        incorporated.   They were being ignored before...
      
      * OrdList.foldOL -->  OrdList.foldrOL, OrdList.foldlOL
      
      * Some tidying up of the tidyOpenTyVar, tidyTyVar functions.  I've
        forgotten exactly what!
      e0d750be
  9. 26 May, 1999 1 commit
  10. 02 Dec, 1998 1 commit
  11. 29 Apr, 1998 1 commit
  12. 20 Mar, 1998 1 commit
  13. 03 Feb, 1998 1 commit
    • simonm's avatar
      [project @ 1998-02-03 17:13:54 by simonm] · be33dbc9
      simonm authored
      - Fixes for bootstrapping with 3.01.
        - Use 'official' extension interfaces rather than internal prelude
          modules (such as ArrBase) where possible.
        - Remove some cruft.
        - Delete some unused imports found by '-fwarn-unused-imports'.
      be33dbc9
  14. 08 Jan, 1998 1 commit
    • simonm's avatar
      [project @ 1998-01-08 18:03:08 by simonm] · 9dd6e1c2
      simonm authored
      The Great Multi-Parameter Type Classes Merge.
      
      Notes from Simon (abridged):
      
      * Multi-parameter type classes are fully implemented.
      * Error messages from the type checker should be noticeably improved
      * Warnings for unused bindings (-fwarn-unused-names)
      * many other minor bug fixes.
      
      Internally there are the following changes
      
      * Removal of Haskell 1.2 compatibility.
      * Dramatic clean-up of the PprStyle stuff.
      * The type Type has been substantially changed.
      * The dictionary for each class is represented by a new
        data type for that purpose, rather than by a tuple.
      9dd6e1c2
  15. 20 Jun, 1997 1 commit
  16. 05 Jun, 1997 1 commit
  17. 26 May, 1997 1 commit
  18. 18 May, 1997 1 commit
  19. 19 Dec, 1996 1 commit
  20. 15 Jul, 1996 1 commit
  21. 26 Jun, 1996 1 commit
  22. 05 Jun, 1996 1 commit
  23. 08 Apr, 1996 1 commit
  24. 07 Apr, 1996 1 commit
  25. 05 Apr, 1996 1 commit
  26. 19 Mar, 1996 1 commit
  27. 08 Jan, 1996 1 commit