1. 06 Jul, 2014 1 commit
  2. 05 Jul, 2014 1 commit
  3. 04 Jul, 2014 2 commits
  4. 03 Jul, 2014 2 commits
    • Jan Stolarek's avatar
      Update documentation · 311c55d1
      Jan Stolarek authored
        * fix links to the User's Guide in ghc and ghci --help messages
        * fix default stack size info in RTS help message
    • Jan Stolarek's avatar
      PrelNames cleanup · 4c91bc6d
      Jan Stolarek authored
        * Replace usage of methName with varQual, because they are identical
        * Minor formatting adjustments
  5. 02 Jul, 2014 11 commits
  6. 01 Jul, 2014 13 commits
  7. 30 Jun, 2014 7 commits
  8. 29 Jun, 2014 3 commits
    • Iavor S. Diatchki's avatar
      Factor-out the `OverlapMode` from `OverlapFlag`. · 99827150
      Iavor S. Diatchki authored
      This seems a bit cleaner conceptually because the overlap mode and running
      in safety mode are quite orthogonal.
      More pragmatically, it also makes it possible to use `OverlapMode` to let
      programmers pick the overlap mode for individual instances.
    • Herbert Valerio Riedel's avatar
      Promote TcNullaryTC and TcCoercible to fast tests · 26f41922
      Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
      I'm wondering whether it's sensible to omit so many typecheck testcases from
      the default validate test target. As for instance, TcNullaryTC has been failing
      since its introduction in c63a4650 (re #8993
      ) and
      it seems to have gone unnoticed so far.
      Signed-off-by: Herbert Valerio Riedel's avatarHerbert Valerio Riedel <hvr@gnu.org>
    • Herbert Valerio Riedel's avatar
      Update 32bit & 64bit performance numbers · f12075d3
      Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
      Some numbers have decreased but the haddock numbers have generally
      increased noticeable again (see also last update in 970e5d99)
      This updates all numbers I noticed in the "fast" test-mode, *except* for
      the T9203 test-case on 32bit, which needs more investigation before
      bumping due to its significant increase:
        bytes allocated value is too high:
            Expected    bytes allocated: 50000000 +/-5%
            Lower bound bytes allocated: 47500000
            Upper bound bytes allocated: 52500000
            Actual      bytes allocated: 85093548
        *** unexpected failure for T9203(normal)