GitLab

Consider the following program:

{-# LANGUAGE RecursiveDo                #-}

module Main where

a :: String
a = "hello"

test :: IO ()
test = mdo
    putStrLn a
    let a = 3 :: Int
    print a

With both GHC 8.2.2 and GHC 8.4.1, it fails with the following error:

/home/matt/Projects/ghc-repro/src/Main.hs:10:5: error:
    • Couldn't match type ‘Int’ with ‘[Char]’
      Expected type: String
        Actual type: Int
    • In a stmt of an 'mdo' block:
        rec putStrLn a
            let a = (3 :: Int)
      In the expression:
        mdo rec putStrLn a
                let a = ...
            print a
      In an equation for ‘test’:
          test
            = mdo rec putStrLn a
                      let ...
                  print a
   |
10 |     putStrLn a
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^

I would expect it to succeed, with a shadowing the top-level definition. The desugared output in the error message tells us what is wrong: it is grouping putStrLn a; let a = ... together!

If I alter the program to be:

a :: String
a = "hello"

test :: IO ()
test = do
    rec putStrLn a
    let a = 3 :: Int
    print a

Then it does the Right Thing.

Looking at the Haskell Prime wiki entry for Recursive Do, this seems to be the relevant bit:

That is, a variable used before it is bound is treated as recursively defined, while in a Haskell 98 do-statement it would be treated as shadowed.

I have a more complicated reproduction involving ST types and complaints of skolem type variables escaping scope:

{-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes  #-}
{-# LANGUAGE RecursiveDo #-}

module Main where

import           Control.Monad.ST

theThing :: ST s ()
theThing = pure ()

weirdlyLocal :: ST s ()
weirdlyLocal = theThing

runSTIO :: (forall s. ST s a) -> IO a
runSTIO x = pure (runST x)

thisWorks :: IO ()
thisWorks = mdo
    let weirdlyLocal = theThing
    runSTIO weirdlyLocal
    runSTIO weirdlyLocal

thisBreaks :: IO ()
thisBreaks = mdo
    runSTIO weirdlyLocal
    let weirdlyLocal = theThing
    runSTIO weirdlyLocal

thisIsFine :: IO ()
thisIsFine = mdo
    runSTIO weirdlyLocal
    let asdf = theThing
    runSTIO asdf

This demonstrates an even more bizarre behavior! If I move the let up to the top, then it no longer gets included in a rec, and it compiles fine. If I move it under the first statement, then I get this error:

/home/matt/Projects/ghc-repro/src/Main.hs:25:13: error:
    • Couldn't match type ‘s0’ with ‘s’
        because type variable ‘s’ would escape its scope
      This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by
        a type expected by the context:
          forall s. ST s ()
        at src/Main.hs:25:5-24
      Expected type: ST s ()
        Actual type: ST s0 ()
    • In the first argument of ‘runSTIO’, namely ‘weirdlyLocal’
      In a stmt of an 'mdo' block: runSTIO weirdlyLocal
      In a stmt of an 'mdo' block:
        rec runSTIO weirdlyLocal
            let weirdlyLocal = theThing
    • Relevant bindings include
        weirdlyLocal :: ST s0 () (bound at src/Main.hs:26:9)
   |
25 |     runSTIO weirdlyLocal
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^

/home/matt/Projects/ghc-repro/src/Main.hs:27:13: error:
    • Couldn't match type ‘s0’ with ‘s’
        because type variable ‘s’ would escape its scope
      This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by
        a type expected by the context:
          forall s. ST s ()
        at src/Main.hs:27:5-24
      Expected type: ST s ()
        Actual type: ST s0 ()
    • In the first argument of ‘runSTIO’, namely ‘weirdlyLocal’
      In a stmt of an 'mdo' block: runSTIO weirdlyLocal
      In the expression:
        mdo rec runSTIO weirdlyLocal
                let weirdlyLocal = ...
            runSTIO weirdlyLocal
    • Relevant bindings include
        weirdlyLocal :: ST s0 () (bound at src/Main.hs:26:9)
   |
27 |     runSTIO weirdlyLocal
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^

Trac metadata

Trac field	Value
Version	8.2.2
Type	Bug
TypeOfFailure	OtherFailure
Priority	normal
Resolution	Unresolved
Component	Compiler
Test case
Differential revisions
BlockedBy
Related
Blocking
CC
Operating system
Architecture