testsuite: T21710a fails on PowerPC
- Show closed items
Activity
-
Newest first Oldest first
-
Show all activity Show comments only Show history only
- Peter Trommler added broken test needs triage testsuite labels
added broken test needs triage testsuite labels
- Author Developer
Note: powerpc64le does not implement tables next to code. That will lead to different Cmm, which might be the cause of the failure we are seeing here.
- sheaf added Pnormal PowerPC Ttask labels and removed needs triage label
added Pnormal PowerPC Ttask labels and removed needs triage label
- Maintainer
Could you post the Cmm code for this test on ppc? Hard to say how it fails otherwise. It being due to TNTC sounds plausible though.
- Andreas Klebinger changed milestone to %9.6.1
changed milestone to %9.6.1
- Andreas Klebinger mentioned in commit 52f472b0
mentioned in commit 52f472b0
- Author Developer
Here is the Cmm I get from running
"~/ghc/_build/stage1/bin/ghc" -c T21710a.hs -dcore-lint -dstg-lint -dcmm-lint -no-user-package-db -fno-dump-with-ways -rtsopts -fno-warn-missed-specialisations -fshow-warning-groups -fdiagnostics-color=never -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -Werror=compat -dno-debug-output -O -fasm -ddump-cmm -dno-typeable-binds
: - Matthew Pickering mentioned in merge request !9017 (closed)
mentioned in merge request !9017 (closed)
- Andreas Klebinger mentioned in commit c71f5ce9
mentioned in commit c71f5ce9
- Andreas Klebinger mentioned in commit 368c2359
mentioned in commit 368c2359
- Andreas Klebinger closed with commit ff6275ef
closed with commit ff6275ef
- Andreas Klebinger mentioned in commit ff6275ef
mentioned in commit ff6275ef
- Author Developer
I am reopening because this still fails on PowerPC. I could not find a CI run where no TNTC was actually tested. It is a manual job.
See failure on Power in my fork.
Edited by Peter Trommler Collapse replies - Author Developer
T21710a is still run on x86_64 without TNTC, see a recent nightly job.
- Peter Trommler reopened
reopened
- Peter Trommler mentioned in issue #22479 (closed)
mentioned in issue #22479 (closed)
- Andreas Klebinger mentioned in merge request !9384 (closed)
mentioned in merge request !9384 (closed)
- Maintainer
Thanks for the ping. It seems I didn't fully implement the hadrian change hopefully !9384 (closed) will fix that.
- Developer
Should be fixed now because of !9384 (closed), please reopen if not.
- Matthew Pickering closed
closed