Skip to content

T3330a: wrong stderr output (new type checking algorithm?)

T3330a failed with

Actual stderr output differs from expected:
--- ./indexed-types/should_fail/T3330a.stderr.normalised	2011-04-02 19:06:10.000000000 +0200
+++ ./indexed-types/should_fail/T3330a.comp.stderr.normalised	2011-04-02 19:06:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,11 +1,9 @@

-T3330a.hs:17:44:
-    Couldn't match type `ix' with `r0 ix0 -> Writer [AnyF s0] (r0 ix0)'
-      `ix' is a rigid type variable bound by
+T3330a.hs:17:34:
+    Couldn't match type `s' with `(->) (s ix1 -> ix1)'
+      `s' is a rigid type variable bound by
            the type signature for children :: s ix -> PF s r ix -> [AnyF s]
            at T3330a.hs:17:1
-    Expected type: PF s r (r0 ix0 -> Writer [AnyF s0] (r0 ix0))
-      Actual type: PF s r ix
-    In the third argument of `hmapM', namely `x'
+    In the first argument of `hmapM', namely `p'
     In the first argument of `execWriter', namely `(hmapM p collect x)'
     In the expression: execWriter (hmapM p collect x)
*** unexpected failure for T3330a(normal)

could be due to the new type checking algorithm.

Trac metadata
Trac field Value
Version 7.0.3
Type Bug
TypeOfFailure OtherFailure
Priority normal
Resolution Unresolved
Component Test Suite
Test case
Differential revisions
BlockedBy
Related
Blocking
CC
Operating system
Architecture
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information