... | ... | @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ On the 23rd July 2008 an IRC meeting on the \#ghc channel decided to make a seri |
|
|
|
|
|
- The GHC developers have sufficient problems with Darcs that a change would be beneficial
|
|
|
|
|
|
- We want to stick with distributed version control, and have a widely-used and well-supported system, so Mercurial and Git are the only real
|
|
|
- We want to stick with distributed version control, and have a widely-used and well-supported system, so Mercurial and Git and bzr are the only real
|
|
|
contenders
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Mercurial and Git and percived as being mostly feature-and-performance comparable, although git is more popular
|
... | ... | @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ Posts/blogs: |
|
|
|
|
|
### Download in other formats:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [Plain Text](/trac/ghc/wiki/DarcsEvaluation?version=54&format=txt)
|
|
|
- [Plain Text](/trac/ghc/wiki/DarcsEvaluation?version=55&format=txt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
... | ... | |