Fix markdown link syntax authored by Tobias Dammers's avatar Tobias Dammers
......@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ This guide summarises the changes you may need to make to your code to migrate f
As part of [ this GHC proposal](https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/05721788de9ab6538def68c3c2c9dec50c9f24a8/proposals/0020-no-type-in-type.rst) (as amended by [ this GHC proposal](https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/146)), a new `StarIsType` extension was introduced, which instructs GHC to treat `*` as a synonym for `Type` (from `Data.Kind`) instead of a binary type operator.
As part of [this GHC proposal](https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/05721788de9ab6538def68c3c2c9dec50c9f24a8/proposals/0020-no-type-in-type.rst) (as amended by [ this GHC proposal](https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/146)), a new `StarIsType` extension was introduced, which instructs GHC to treat `*` as a synonym for `Type` (from `Data.Kind`) instead of a binary type operator.
......@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Will not typecheck if `StarIsType` is enabled, since `m * n` is treated as if on
GHC now enables the `MonadFailDesugaring` extension by default, as discussed in [ https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/Proposals/MonadFail\#Transitionalstrategy](https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/Proposals/MonadFail#Transitionalstrategy). This means that code that uses partial pattern matches in `do`-notation, such as this:
GHC now enables the `MonadFailDesugaring` extension by default, as discussed in [https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/Proposals/MonadFail\#Transitionalstrategy](https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/Proposals/MonadFail#Transitionalstrategy). This means that code that uses partial pattern matches in `do`-notation, such as this:
```
......@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ f l = case l of
```
Depending on the code, it is possible that this change will result in breakage. See [ https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/Proposals/MonadFail\#Adaptingoldcode](https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/Proposals/MonadFail#Adaptingoldcode) for ways to adapt to breakage.
Depending on the code, it is possible that this change will result in breakage. See [https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/Proposals/MonadFail\#Adaptingoldcode](https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/Proposals/MonadFail#Adaptingoldcode) for ways to adapt to breakage.
### Constructor-less GADTs now require `GADTSyntax`
......
......