| ... | ... | @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ For implementation status, see tickets with the ~OverloadedRecordFields, ~Duplic |
|
|
|
## Accepted but not yet (fully) implemented
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access](https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0366-no-ambiguous-field-access.rst) (implemented for fields in GHC 9.2, not yet implemented for updates, see #19461)
|
|
|
|
- [Adding setField to HasField](https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0042-record-set-field.rst), redesigned by [`HasField` redesign: split into two classes](https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0583-hasfield-redesign.rst) (accepted but not yet implemented, see #16232)
|
|
|
|
- [Adding setField to HasField](https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0042-record-set-field.rst), redesigned by [`HasField` redesign: split into two classes](https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0583-hasfield-redesign.rst) (accepted but not yet implemented, see #16232 and #22156)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Proposed
|
| ... | ... | |
