| ... | ... | @@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ Accepted GHC proposals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned design changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [Relaxing HasField constraints](https://github.com/ocharles/ghc-proposals/blob/hasfield/proposals/0000-hasfield-incoherence.rst) (proposal at discussion stage)
|
|
|
|
- [Add warning for incomplete record selectors: proposal 516](https://github.com/adamgundry/ghc-proposals/blob/incomplete-record-selectors/proposals/0000-incomplete-record-selectors.rst) (proposal at discussion stage)
|
|
|
|
- Split `HasField` into two classes (with no type families) and support representation polymorphism ([HasField redesign](https://github.com/adamgundry/ghc-proposals/blob/hasfield-redesign/proposals/0000-hasfield-redesign.rst) without type-changing update)
|
|
|
|
- [Relaxing HasField constraints](https://github.com/ocharles/ghc-proposals/blob/hasfield/proposals/0000-hasfield-incoherence.rst) (proposal under review)
|
|
|
|
- [Add warning for incomplete record selectors: proposal 516](https://github.com/adamgundry/ghc-proposals/blob/incomplete-record-selectors/proposals/0000-incomplete-record-selectors.rst) (proposal under review)
|
|
|
|
- [`HasField` redesign: split into two classes](https://github.com/adamgundry/ghc-proposals/blob/hasfield-redesign/proposals/0000-hasfield-redesign.rst) (draft proposal)
|
|
|
|
- [Add type-changing update](https://github.com/adamgundry/ghc-proposals/blob/hasfield-redesign/proposals/0000-hasfield-type-changing-update.rst) (draft proposal)
|
|
|
|
- Clarify semantics of "functional" dependencies for use in `HasField`/`SetField` (initial thoughts on [Wiggly arrows](https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/wikis/Functional-dependencies-in-GHC/Wiggly-arrows) wiki page)
|
|
|
|
- Add type-changing update (the remaining parts of [HasField redesign](https://github.com/adamgundry/ghc-proposals/blob/hasfield-redesign/proposals/0000-hasfield-redesign.rst))
|
|
|
|
- Allow record pattern synonyms to solve `HasField` constraints (question around multi-constructor pattern synonyms: need pattern synonym collections?)
|
|
|
|
- Datatype names as module qualifiers in updates (no proposal yet, see [discussion](https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/discussions/506#discussioncomment-2868700))
|
|
|
|
- Anonymous non-extensible records?
|
| ... | ... | |
