Admin message

Due to a large amount of spam we do not allow new users to create repositories, they are "external" users. If you are a new user and want to create a repository, for example for forking GHC, open a new issue on ghc/ghc using the "get-verified" issue template

reify RHS of "value" variable
According to the [documentation](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/template-haskell-2.12.0.0/docs/Language-Haskell-TH-Syntax.html#t:Info), when reifying value variables "returning the RHS has not yet been implemented because of lack of interest". I'd like to formally request interest since I don't see a ticket here (may have missed it). My motivating example is to make source available for documentation and better error messages. Something like: ```hs printSource :: Name -> Q Exp printSource n = do VarI _ _ (Just dec) <- reify n lift $ pprint dec foo x = x * 2 fooSource = $(printSource 'foo) -- === "\x_0 -> x_0 GHC.Num.* 2" ``` How significant of a change is this? I could take a pass at it if pointed to the relevant bits, having not contributed to GHC before. <details><summary>Trac metadata</summary> | Trac field | Value | | ---------------------- | ---------------- | | Version | 8.2.1 | | Type | FeatureRequest | | TypeOfFailure | OtherFailure | | Priority | normal | | Resolution | Unresolved | | Component | Template Haskell | | Test case | | | Differential revisions | | | BlockedBy | | | Related | | | Blocking | | | CC | | | Operating system | | | Architecture | | </details> <!-- {"blocked_by":[],"summary":"reify RHS of \"value\" variable","status":"New","operating_system":"","component":"Template Haskell","related":[],"milestone":"","resolution":"Unresolved","owner":{"tag":"Unowned"},"version":"8.2.1","keywords":[],"differentials":[],"test_case":"","architecture":"","cc":[""],"type":"FeatureRequest","description":"According to the [https://hackage.haskell.org/package/template-haskell-2.12.0.0/docs/Language-Haskell-TH-Syntax.html#t:Info documentation], when reifying value variables \"returning the RHS has not yet been implemented because of lack of interest\". I'd like to formally request interest since I don't see a ticket here (may have missed it).\r\n\r\nMy motivating example is to make source available for documentation and better error messages. Something like:\r\n\r\n{{{#!hs\r\nprintSource :: Name -> Q Exp\r\nprintSource n = do\r\n VarI _ _ (Just dec) <- reify n\r\n lift $ pprint dec\r\n\r\nfoo x = x * 2\r\nfooSource = $(printSource 'foo) -- === \"\\x_0 -> x_0 GHC.Num.* 2\"\r\n}}}\r\n\r\nHow significant of a change is this? I could take a pass at it if pointed to the relevant bits, having not contributed to GHC before.","type_of_failure":"OtherFailure","blocking":[]} -->
issue