Commit 9b59e126 authored by Ningning Xie's avatar Ningning Xie Committed by Ömer Sinan Ağacan

Only skip decls with CUSKs with PolyKinds on (fix #16609)

parent 52fc2719
......@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ we can get away with this is because we have more systematic TYPE r
inference, which means that we can do unification between kinds that
aren't lifted (this historically was not true.)
The downside of not directly reading off the kinds off the RHS of
The downside of not directly reading off the kinds of the RHS of
type synonyms in topological order is that we don't transparently
support making synonyms of types with higher-rank kinds. But
you can always specify a CUSK directly to make this work out.
......@@ -314,6 +314,23 @@ This gets us more polymorphism than we would otherwise get, similar
(but implemented strangely differently from) the treatment of type
signatures in value declarations.
However, we only want to do so when we have PolyKinds.
When we have NoPolyKinds, we don't skip those decls, because we have defaulting
(#16609). Skipping won't bring us more polymorphism when we have defaulting.
data T1 a = MkT1 T2 -- No CUSK
data T2 = MkT2 (T1 Maybe) -- Has CUSK
If we skip the rhs of T2 during kind-checking, the kind of a remains unsolved.
With PolyKinds, we do generalization to get T1 :: forall a. a -> *. And the
program type-checks.
But with NoPolyKinds, we do defaulting to get T1 :: * -> *. Defaulting happens
in quantifyTyVars, which is called from generaliseTcTyCon. Then type-checking
(T1 Maybe) will throw a type error.
Summary: with PolyKinds, we must skip; with NoPolyKinds, we must /not/ skip.
Open type families
This treatment of type synonyms only applies to Haskell 98-style synonyms.
......@@ -405,9 +422,9 @@ We do the following steps:
B :-> TyConPE
MkB :-> DataConPE
2. kcTyCLGruup
2. kcTyCLGroup
- Do getInitialKinds, which will signal a promotion
error if B is used in any of the kinds needed to initialse
error if B is used in any of the kinds needed to initialise
B's kind (e.g. (a :: Type)) here
- Extend the type env with these initial kinds (monomorphic for
......@@ -512,8 +529,10 @@ kcTyClGroup decls
-- NB: the environment extension overrides the tycon
-- promotion-errors bindings
-- See Note [Type environment evolution]
; poly_kinds <- xoptM LangExt.PolyKinds
; tcExtendKindEnvWithTyCons mono_tcs $
mapM_ kcLTyClDecl no_cusk_decls
mapM_ kcLTyClDecl (if poly_kinds then no_cusk_decls else decls)
-- See Note [Skip decls with CUSKs in kcLTyClDecl]
; return mono_tcs }
......@@ -810,8 +829,8 @@ We do kind inference as follows:
Note [Unification variables need fresh Names]
Assign initial monomorophic kinds to S, T
S :: kk1 -> * -> kk2 -> *
T :: kk3 -> * -> kk4 -> *
T :: kk1 -> * -> kk2 -> *
S :: kk3 -> * -> kk4 -> *
* Step 2: kcTyClDecl. Extend the environment with a TcTyCon for S and
T, with these monomophic kinds. Now kind-check the declarations,
......@@ -900,7 +919,7 @@ But when typechecking the default declarations for 'cop' and 'dop' in
tcDlassDecl2 we need {a, ka} and {b, kb} respectively to be in scope.
But at that point all we have is the utterly-final Class itself.
Conclusion: the classTyVars of a class must have the same Mame as
Conclusion: the classTyVars of a class must have the same Name as
that originally assigned by the user. In our example, C must have
classTyVars {a, ka, x} while D has classTyVars {a, kb, y}. Despite
the fact that kka and kkb got unified!
module T16609 where
data T1 a = MkT1 T2
data T2 = MkT2 (T1 Maybe)
......@@ -671,3 +671,4 @@ test('T16204b', normal, compile, [''])
test('T16225', normal, compile, [''])
test('T13951', normal, compile, [''])
test('T16411', normal, compile, [''])
test('T16609', normal, compile, [''])
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment