Skip to content

Generalize injective type families

With injective type families we can now declare that type family result determines the arguments. But ITFs are not yet as expressive as functional dependencies. For example with FDs I can say:

data Nat = Zero | Succ a

class Add a b r | a b -> r, r a -> b
instance                Add Zero     b b
instance (Add a b r) => Add (Succ a) b (Succ r)

Here we declare that the result and the first argument taken together uniquely determine the second argument. This is not currently possible with ITFs:

type family AddTF a b = r | r a -> b where
     AddTF Zero     b = b
     AddTF (Succ a) b = Succ (AddTF a b)

But we want to be able to say that.

Trac metadata
Trac field Value
Version 7.11
Type FeatureRequest
TypeOfFailure OtherFailure
Priority normal
Resolution Unresolved
Component Compiler (Type checker)
Test case
Differential revisions
BlockedBy
Related
Blocking
CC
Operating system
Architecture
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information