ImpredicativeTypes even more broken than usual

I don't have the latest version of GHC, trying to derive Functor A and Foldable A is fine but when I derive Traversable A in the attachment Error.hs:

{-# LANGUAGE DeriveFunctor, DeriveFoldable, DeriveTraversable, ImpredicativeTypes #-}

import Data.Functor     (Functor)
import Data.Foldable    (Foldable)
import Data.Traversable (Traversable)

data A a = A
  deriving (Functor, Foldable, Traversable)

GHC barks at me (verbose log attached):

/tmp/Error.hs:8:32: error:
    • Couldn't match type ‘forall a1. A a1’ with ‘A b’
      Expected type: f (A b)
        Actual type: f (forall a. A a)
    • In the expression: pure A
      In an equation for ‘traverse’: traverse f A = pure A
      When typechecking the code for ‘traverse’
        in a derived instance for ‘Traversable A’:
        To see the code I am typechecking, use -ddump-deriv
      In the instance declaration for ‘Traversable A’
    • Relevant bindings include
        f :: a -> f b (bound at /tmp/Error.hs:8:32)
        traverse :: (a -> f b) -> A a -> f (A b)
          (bound at /tmp/Error.hs:8:32)

With -ddump-deriv we get this (unqualified) instance:

  instance Traversable A where
    traverse f_a2Le A = pure A

which by itself causes the same problem in the attachment Error2.hs:

{-# LANGUAGE DeriveFunctor, DeriveFoldable, ImpredicativeTypes #-}

import Data.Functor     (Functor)
import Data.Foldable    (Foldable)
import Data.Traversable (Traversable)

data A a = A
  deriving (Functor, Foldable)

instance Traversable A where
  traverse f A = pure A

Works fine in GHC-7.10.2 and GHC-7.10.0.20150316 and GHC-7.4 (with some additional imports), is this an ImpredicativeTypes regression?

Trac metadata

Trac field	Value
Version	7.11
Type	Bug
TypeOfFailure	OtherFailure
Priority	normal
Resolution	Unresolved
Component	Compiler (Type checker)
Test case
Differential revisions
BlockedBy
Related
Blocking
CC
Operating system
Architecture