Misleading error message when deriving Functor
Compiling this trivial demo program:
data Container
= Container [Wibble Int]
deriving (Eq, Show)
data Wibble a
= Wibble a
| Wobble
deriving (Eq, Functor, Show)
results in the error message:
a.hs:6:13: error:
• No instance for (Eq (Wibble Int))
arising from the first field of ‘Container’ (type ‘[Wibble Int]’)
Possible fix:
use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
• When deriving the instance for (Eq Container)
a.hs:6:17: error:
• No instance for (Show (Wibble Int))
arising from the first field of ‘Container’ (type ‘[Wibble Int]’)
Possible fix:
use a standalone 'deriving instance' declaration,
so you can specify the instance context yourself
• When deriving the instance for (Show Container)
a.hs:12:17: error:
• Can't make a derived instance of ‘Functor Wibble’:
You need DeriveFunctor to derive an instance for this class
• In the data declaration for ‘Wibble’
The "No instance for (Eq|Show)" are rather misleading, because the *actual* error is that the {-# LANGUAGE DeriveFunctor #-} pragma is missing.
Trac metadata
| Trac field | Value |
|---|---|
| Version | 8.0.1 |
| Type | Bug |
| TypeOfFailure | OtherFailure |
| Priority | normal |
| Resolution | Unresolved |
| Component | Compiler |
| Test case | |
| Differential revisions | |
| BlockedBy | |
| Related | |
| Blocking | |
| CC | |
| Operating system | |
| Architecture |