sparc membar asm instruction requires mode parameter
The new parallel/WSDeque.c uses store_load_barrier() from includes/SMP.h.
EXTERN_INLINE void
store_load_barrier(void) {
#if i386_HOST_ARCH
__asm__ __volatile__ ("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)" : : : "memory");
#elif x86_64_HOST_ARCH
__asm__ __volatile__ ("lock; addq $0,0(%%rsp)" : : : "memory");
#elif powerpc_HOST_ARCH
__asm__ __volatile__ ("msync" : : : "memory");
#elif sparc_HOST_ARCH
/* Sparc in TSO mode does not require write/write barriers. */
__asm__ __volatile__ ("membar" : : : "memory");
#elif !defined(WITHSMP)
return;
#else
#error memory barriers unimplemented on this architecture
#endif
In particular for sparc the bit:
/* Sparc in TSO mode does not require write/write barriers. */
__asm__ __volatile__ ("membar" : : : "memory");
This is not right. The membar assembly statement requires a parameter to specify which kind of memory barrier is required. For store_load_barrier() it is of course membar #StoreLoad.
Without this the assembler complains:
/usr/ccs/bin/as: "parallel/WSDeque.s", line 11: error: statement syntax
With #StoreLoad added it's fine.
Note also that the comment appears to be wrong
/* Sparc in TSO mode does not require write/write barriers. */
This is store_load_barrier() not store_store_barrier() so it is exactly and only this case that is required.
Trac metadata
| Trac field | Value |
|---|---|
| Version | 6.11 |
| Type | Bug |
| TypeOfFailure | OtherFailure |
| Priority | normal |
| Resolution | Unresolved |
| Component | Compiler |
| Test case | |
| Differential revisions | |
| BlockedBy | |
| Related | |
| Blocking | |
| CC | |
| Operating system | |
| Architecture |