Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Unverified Commit 4743d213 authored by Phil de Joux's avatar Phil de Joux
Browse files

Rerun test with shorter output

The earlier output was from cabal-install-3.10.2.0 compiled using Cabal-3.10.2.1, from ~/.ghcup/bin/cabal
parent 7f6bd1c6
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -2,9 +2,10 @@
Downloading the latest package list from test-local-repo
# cabal v2-build
Resolving dependencies...
Error: cabal: Could not resolve dependencies:
Error: [Cabal-7107]
Could not resolve dependencies:
[__0] next goal: pandoc (user goal)
[__0] rejecting: pandoc-999999999.0.0.0 (constraint from project config <ROOT>/cabal.project requires ==3.1.11)
[__0] rejecting: pandoc-3.1.11, pandoc-3.1.10, pandoc-3.1.9, pandoc-3.1.8, pandoc-3.1.7, pandoc-3.1.6.2, pandoc-3.1.6.1, pandoc-3.1.5, pandoc-3.1.4, pandoc-3.1.3, pandoc-3.1.2, pandoc-3.1.1, pandoc-3.0.1, pandoc-3.0, pandoc-2.19.2, pandoc-2.19.1, pandoc-2.19, pandoc-2.18, pandoc-2.17.1.1, pandoc-2.17.1, pandoc-2.17.0.1, pandoc-2.17, pandoc-2.16.2, pandoc-2.16.1, pandoc-2.16, pandoc-2.15, pandoc-2.14.2, pandoc-2.14.1, pandoc-2.14.0.3, pandoc-2.14.0.2, pandoc-2.14.0.1, pandoc-2.14, pandoc-2.13, pandoc-2.12, pandoc-2.11.4, pandoc-2.11.3.2, pandoc-2.11.3.1, pandoc-2.11.3, pandoc-2.11.2, pandoc-2.11.1.1, pandoc-2.11.1, pandoc-2.11.0.4 (constraint from user target requires ==999999999.0.0.0)
[__0] rejecting: pandoc; 3.1.11, 3.1.10, 3.1.9, 3.1.8, 3.1.7, 3.1.6.2, 3.1.6.1, 3.1.5, 3.1.4, 3.1.3, 3.1.2, 3.1.1, 3.0.1, 3.0, 2.19.2, 2.19.1, 2.19, 2.18, 2.17.1.1, 2.17.1, 2.17.0.1, 2.17, 2.16.2, 2.16.1, 2.16, 2.15, 2.14.2, 2.14.1, 2.14.0.3, 2.14.0.2, 2.14.0.1, 2.14, 2.13, 2.12, 2.11.4, 2.11.3.2, 2.11.3.1, 2.11.3, 2.11.2, 2.11.1.1, 2.11.1, 2.11.0.4 (constraint from user target requires ==999999999.0.0.0)
[__0] fail (backjumping, conflict set: pandoc)
After searching the rest of the dependency tree exhaustively, these were the goals I've had most trouble fulfilling: pandoc (44)
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment