Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in / Register
  • P prime
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Locked Files
  • Issues 128
    • Issues 128
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
    • Requirements
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • Code review
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • HaskellHaskell
  • prime
  • Wiki
  • infix type constructors

infix type constructors · Changes

Page history
Edit InfixTypeConstructors authored Oct 09, 2008 by Simon Peyton Jones's avatar Simon Peyton Jones
Show whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
infix-type-constructors.md
View page @ 5b7b5344
......@@ -56,14 +56,6 @@ And `type` gets an extra production:
(modulo [FixityResolution](fixity-resolution)). Also, there are obvious changes to the grammar for `type`, `data`, and `newtype` declarations.
Some people use constructors (think of the type a+b). Mirroring this in Haskell would make the transcription more elegantly direct.
I can't think of any down-sides, except the slight loss of consistency ("the hobgoblin of tiny minds").
## Observations
......
Clone repository Edit sidebar
  • Arrows
  • BangPatterns
  • DeepSeq
  • ExistentialQuantification
  • ExplicitForall
  • FlexibleContexts
  • FlexibleInstances
  • ForeignFunctionInterface
  • FunctionalDependencies
  • GADTs
  • ImplicitParams
  • IncoherentInstances
  • KindAnnotations
  • LamdaCase
  • MultiParamTypeClasses dilemma
View All Pages