| ... | ... | @@ -54,3 +54,8 @@ There has been past discussion on mailing lists about clarifying the import/expo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I believe this would solve the same problems as the above proposal, but would be much less backward-compatible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Permit Signatures in Export Lists
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a good case to be made for permitting the inclusion of function signatures in the export list of a module. People often write them there anyway in comments, but the comments are not checked against the implementation, so changes can go unnoticed. There is also a good software engineering principle that says you should specify your interfaces as fully as possible. |
