qualified-operators.md

@@ -137,6 +137,19 @@ This proposal simplifies the story for composition: we don't have to worry about
 - The syntax for infix qualified operators is heavier: ``Prelude.(>>=)`` vs. `Prelude.>>=`
 - Using the workaround `let (>>=) = Prelude.(>>=) in ...` does not work, because `>>=` has the default fixity.
 - ``...`` and `(...)` are not dual
+- we lose some consistency with sections, which become quite unwieldy with the new syntax:
+
+```wiki
+             left section  right section   prefix
+unqualified  (+ 1)         (1 +)           (+)
+Haskell 98   (M.+ 1)       (1 M.+)         (M.+)
+proposed     (`M.(+)` 1)   (1 `M.(+)`)     M.(+)
+   or(*)     (M.(+) 1)     (flip M.(+) 1)
+```
+
+
+(\*) only if precedence isn't important, e.g. not in cases like ``M.(+)` x `M.(*)` y`.
+
 
 ## References