Commit 7d96c987 authored by simonmar's avatar simonmar
Browse files

[project @ 2005-11-23 14:28:52 by simonmar]

un-revert rev. 1.22, it wasn't the cause of last weekend's breakage
parent 30ee6ff7
......@@ -249,6 +249,8 @@ but uses $$dyncall if necessary to cope, just in case you aren't.
function and these markers is shredded by the mangler.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
#ifndef FB_
#if __GNUC__ < 3
/* The following __DISCARD__() has become necessary with gcc 2.96 on x86.
* It prevents gcc from moving stack manipulation code from the function
* body (aka the Real Code) into the function prologue, ie, from moving it
......@@ -258,9 +260,17 @@ but uses $$dyncall if necessary to cope, just in case you aren't.
* it just doesn't choose to do it at the moment.
* -= chak
*/
#ifndef FB_
#define FB_ __asm__ volatile ("--- BEGIN ---"); __DISCARD__ ();
#else
/* The __DISCARD__() doesn't appear to be necessary with gcc >= 3.2 at
* least, and it does cause some difficulty, preventing gcc from
* optimising around the beginning of the function. In particular,
* gcc leaves some stack assignments in the prologue when the call is
* present. --SDM
*/
#define FB_ __asm__ volatile ("--- BEGIN ---");
#endif
#endif
#ifndef FE_
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment