- 23 Feb, 2016 12 commits
-
-
thomie authored
-
thomie authored
Refactoring only. I compared before and after with 'make slow', and it still runs each test with the same 'ways' as before.
-
thomie authored
-
thomie authored
-
thomie authored
-
thomie authored
-
thomie authored
-
thomie authored
-
thomie authored
-
thomie authored
-
thomie authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 22 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
- 21 Feb, 2016 3 commits
- 20 Feb, 2016 7 commits
-
-
thomie authored
-
thomie authored
-
nushio authored
Ticket #11535 dealt with derived Read instances of infix Unicode value constructors. GHC 7.10.3 used to derive (Read/Show) instances so that `read . show` for values of such types had no parse. The issue has been fixed by other compiler update. This patch adds only tests, so that derived instance of Read/Show for infix Unicode value constructors has correct parse, satisfying Haskell 2010 Specification. Resolves: #11535 Test Plan: `make test TEST=T11535` Reviewers: austin, rwbarton, thomie, bgamari Reviewed By: rwbarton, thomie, bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Projects: #ghc Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1884 GHC Trac Issues: #11535
-
Simon Marlow authored
The previous test failed for me because I had GhcRTSWays += thr_debug_p in my validate.mk, which doesn't enable profiling by itself.
-
Simon Marlow authored
Originally I planned to make this reference manually managed, but it looks like at some point I gave it a finalizer on the GHC side, but forgot to remove the manual free here. The result is that ghc-iserv could crash in getStablePtr sometimes when using TH.
-
Simon Marlow authored
In some cases ApplicativeDo would miss some opportunities, due to a wrong calculation of free variables in RnExpr.segments.
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 19 Feb, 2016 5 commits
-
-
thomie authored
-
thomie authored
should_compile_flag_nohaddock and should_compile_noflag_nohaddock contain the exact same tests. By passing `-haddock` to the tests in should_compile_**flag**_nohaddock, at least they're now testing different things. Add documentation.
-
thomie authored
Refactoring only. Cleanup some loose ends from #10196. Initially the idea was to only allow modifier letters at the end of identifiers. Since we later decided to allow modifier letters also in the middle of identifiers (because not doing so would not fix the regression completely), the names `suffix` and `okIdSuffixChar` don't seem appropriate anymore. Remove TODO. Move test from should_fail to should_compile.
-
thomie authored
A long time ago, you could use `"-- # <haddock options>"` to mean that `<haddock options.` should be passed to `haddock`. Since 2007 (03d8585e), using `OPTIONS_HADDOCK` is the preferred way to do this. Why is ok to remove support for "-- # .."? * It is not mentioned in the Haddock user's guide, nor are there any tests that use it. * Ever since 2011 (b3e30449), it doesn't actually work anymore. The function `getOptionsFromFile` uses `gopt_unset dflags Opt_Haddock` for other reasons, so even when running ghc with `--haddock`, the following rule always fires when the lexer sees "-- # ..", and it gets treated as a normal comment: ``` -- Next, match Haddock comments if no -haddock flag "-- " [$docsym \#] .* / { ifExtension (not . haddockEnabled) } { lineCommentToken } ``` Reviewed by: bgamari Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1932
-
Gabor Greif authored
-
- 18 Feb, 2016 7 commits
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
Ben Gamari authored
In order to make this work I needed to shuffle around typechecking a bit such that `TyCon` and friends are available during compilation of GHC.Types. I also did a bit of refactoring of `TcTypeable`. Test Plan: Validate Reviewers: simonpj, austin Subscribers: simonpj, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1906 GHC Trac Issues: #11120
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
...when computing the size of a call on the RHS of a type instance declaration. This came up in Trac #11581. The change is in TcType.tcTyFamInsts which now trims the type arguments in a call. See the comments with that function definition.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Several things here: * Re-implement piResultTys so that its substitution has the correct in-scope set That means paying close attention to performance, since as we discovered in Trac #11371, it's a heavily used function and is often used on ordinary function types, with no foralls to worry about substituting. * Kill off applyTys, which was just the same as piResultTys. * Re-engineer MkCore.mkCoreApps so that it calls piResultTys, rather than repeatedly calling piResultTy.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
No change in functionality here, but greater clarity: * In FamInstEnv.FlattenEnv, kill off the fi_in_scope field We are already maintaining an in-scope set in the fe_subst field, so it's silly do to it twice. (This isn't strictly connected to the rest of this patch, but the nomenclature changes below affect the same code, so I put them together.) * TyCoRep.extendTCVSubst used to take a TyVar or a CoVar and work out what to do, but in fact we almost always know which of the two we are doing. So: - define extendTvSubst, extendCvSubst - and use them * Similar renamings in TyCoRep: - extendTCvSubstList --> extendTvSubstList - extendTCvSubstBinder --> extendTvSubstBinder - extendTCvSubstAndInScope --> extendTvSubstAndInScope * Add Type.extendTvSubstWithClone, extendCvSubstWithClone * Similar nomenclature changes in Subst, SimplEnv, Specialise * Kill off TyCoRep.substTelescope (never used)
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
When implementing Strict Haskell, the patch 46a03fbe didn't faithfully implement the semantics given in the manual. In particular there was an ad-hoc case in mkSelectorBinds for "strict and no binders" that didn't work. This patch fixes it, curing Trac #11572. Howver it forced me to think about banged let-bindings, and I rather think we do not have quite the right semantics yet, so I've opened Trac #11601.
-
Ben Gamari authored
RyanGlScott updated the Diff only after I had merged it.
-
- 17 Feb, 2016 5 commits
-
-
eir@cis.upenn.edu authored
-
mark_christiaens authored
Reviewers: austin, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1927 GHC Trac Issues: #11590
-
Ryan Scott authored
Currently, `-XDeriveFoldable` and `-XDeriveTraversable` generate unnecessary `mempty` and `pure` expressions when it traverses of an argument of a constructor whose type does not mention the last type parameter. Not only is this inefficient, but it prevents `Traversable` from being derivable for datatypes with unlifted arguments (see Trac #11174). The solution to this problem is to adopt a slight change to the algorithms for `-XDeriveFoldable` and `-XDeriveTraversable`, which is described in [this wiki page](https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Compiler/DeriveFu nctor#Proposal:alternativestrategyforderivingFoldableandTraversable). The wiki page also describes why we don't apply the same changes to the algorithm for `-XDeriveFunctor`. This is techincally a breaking change for users of `-XDeriveFoldable` and `-XDeriveTraversable`, since if someone was using a law-breaking `Monoid` instance with a derived `Foldable` instance (i.e., one where `x <> mempty` does not equal `x`) or a law-breaking `Applicative` instance with a derived `Traversable` instance, then the new generated code could result in different behavior. I suspect the number of scenarios like this is very small, and the onus really should be on those users to fix up their `Monoid`/`Applicative` instances. Fixes #11174. Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: hvr, simonpj, austin, bgamari Reviewed By: simonpj, bgamari Subscribers: thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1908 GHC Trac Issues: #11174
-
Gabriel439 authored
The Eq and Ord instance were previously hand-written and this change updates them to be automatically derived by the compiler. The derived behavior should be equivalent to the original. Reviewers: hvr, austin, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1913
-
eir@cis.upenn.edu authored
Previously, we looked through synonyms when counting arguments, but that's a bit silly.
-