- 23 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Gabor Greif authored
-
- 19 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Richard Eisenberg authored
This commit implements the proposal in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/29 and https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/35. Here are some of the pieces of that proposal: * Some of RuntimeRep's constructors have been shortened. * TupleRep and SumRep are now parameterized over a list of RuntimeReps. * This means that two types with the same kind surely have the same representation. Previously, all unboxed tuples had the same kind, and thus the fact above was false. * RepType.typePrimRep and friends now return a *list* of PrimReps. These functions can now work successfully on unboxed tuples. This change is necessary because we allow abstraction over unboxed tuple types and so cannot always handle unboxed tuples specially as we did before. * We sometimes have to create an Id from a PrimRep. I thus split PtrRep * into LiftedRep and UnliftedRep, so that the created Ids have the right strictness. * The RepType.RepType type was removed, as it didn't seem to help with * much. * The RepType.repType function is also removed, in favor of typePrimRep. * I have waffled a good deal on whether or not to keep VoidRep in TyCon.PrimRep. In the end, I decided to keep it there. PrimRep is *not* represented in RuntimeRep, and typePrimRep will never return a list including VoidRep. But it's handy to have in, e.g., ByteCodeGen and friends. I can imagine another design choice where we have a PrimRepV type that is PrimRep with an extra constructor. That seemed to be a heavier design, though, and I'm not sure what the benefit would be. * The last, unused vestiges of # (unliftedTypeKind) have been removed. * There were several pretty-printing bugs that this change exposed; * these are fixed. * We previously checked for levity polymorphism in the types of binders. * But we also must exclude levity polymorphism in function arguments. This is hard to check for, requiring a good deal of care in the desugarer. See Note [Levity polymorphism checking] in DsMonad. * In order to efficiently check for levity polymorphism in functions, it * was necessary to add a new bit of IdInfo. See Note [Levity info] in IdInfo. * It is now safe for unlifted types to be unsaturated in Core. Core Lint * is updated accordingly. * We can only know strictness after zonking, so several checks around * strictness in the type-checker (checkStrictBinds, the check for unlifted variables under a ~ pattern) have been moved to the desugarer. * Along the way, I improved the treatment of unlifted vs. banged * bindings. See Note [Strict binds checks] in DsBinds and #13075. * Now that we print type-checked source, we must be careful to print * ConLikes correctly. This is facilitated by a new HsConLikeOut constructor to HsExpr. Particularly troublesome are unlifted pattern synonyms that get an extra void# argument. * Includes a submodule update for haddock, getting rid of #. * New testcases: typecheck/should_fail/StrictBinds typecheck/should_fail/T12973 typecheck/should_run/StrictPats typecheck/should_run/T12809 typecheck/should_fail/T13105 patsyn/should_fail/UnliftedPSBind typecheck/should_fail/LevPolyBounded typecheck/should_compile/T12987 typecheck/should_compile/T11736 * Fixed tickets: #12809 #12973 #11736 #13075 #12987 * This also adds a test case for #13105. This test case is * "compile_fail" and succeeds, because I want the testsuite to monitor the error message. When #13105 is fixed, the test case will compile cleanly.
-
- 17 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
eir@cis.upenn.edu authored
Previously, GHC checked for bad levity polymorphism to the left of all arrows in data constructors. This was wrong, as reported in #12911 (where an example is also shown). The solution is to check each individual argument for bad levity polymorphism. Thus the check has been moved from TcValidity to TcTyClsDecls. A similar situation exists with pattern synonyms, also fixed here. This patch also nabs #12819 while I was in town. Test cases: typecheck/should_compile/T12911, patsyn/should_fail/T12819 Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: simonpj, austin, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2783 GHC Trac Issues: #12819, #12911
-
- 20 Jul, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ömer Sinan Ağacan authored
Not having SCCs at the top level is becoming annoying real quick. For simplest cases, it's possible to do this transformation: f x y = ... => f = {-# SCC f #-} \x y -> ... However, it doesn't work when there's a `where` clause: f x y = <t is in scope> where t = ... => f = {-# SCC f #-} \x y -> <t is out of scope> where t = ... Or when we have a "equation style" definition: f (C1 ...) = ... f (C2 ...) = ... f (C3 ...) = ... ... (usual solution is to rename `f` to `f'` and define a new `f` with a `SCC`) This patch implements support for SCC annotations in declaration contexts. This is now a valid program: f x y = ... where g z = ... {-# SCC g #-} {-# SCC f #-} Test Plan: This passes slow validate (no new failures added). Reviewers: goldfire, mpickering, austin, bgamari, simonmar Reviewed By: bgamari, simonmar Subscribers: simonmar, thomie, mpickering Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2407
-
- 01 Jul, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Matthew Pickering authored
This makes pattern synonym signatures more consistent with normal type signatures. Updates haddock submodule. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2083
-
- 25 Jun, 2016 1 commit
-
-
eir@cis.upenn.edu authored
This renames VisibilityFlag from > data VisibilityFlag = Visible | Specified | Invisible to > data ArgFlag = Required | Specified | Inferred The old name was quite confusing, because both Specified and Invisible were invisible! The new names are hopefully clearer.
-
- 21 Jun, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Gabor Greif authored
-
- 15 Jun, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Before this patch, following the TypeInType innovations, each TyCon had two lists: - tyConBinders :: [TyBinder] - tyConTyVars :: [TyVar] They were in 1-1 correspondence and contained overlapping information. More broadly, there were many places where we had to pass around this pair of lists, instead of a single list. This commit tidies all that up, by having just one list of binders in a TyCon: - tyConBinders :: [TyConBinder] The new data types look like this: Var.hs: data TyVarBndr tyvar vis = TvBndr tyvar vis data VisibilityFlag = Visible | Specified | Invisible type TyVarBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar VisibilityFlag TyCon.hs: type TyConBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar TyConBndrVis data TyConBndrVis = NamedTCB VisibilityFlag | AnonTCB TyCoRep.hs: data TyBinder = Named TyVarBinder | Anon Type Note that Var.TyVarBdr has moved from TyCoRep and has been made polymorphic in the tyvar and visiblity fields: type TyVarBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar VisibilityFlag -- Used in ForAllTy type TyConBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar TyConBndrVis -- Used in TyCon type IfaceForAllBndr = TyVarBndr IfaceTvBndr VisibilityFlag type IfaceTyConBinder = TyVarBndr IfaceTvBndr TyConBndrVis -- Ditto, in interface files There are a zillion knock-on changes, but everything arises from these types. It was a bit fiddly to get the module loops to work out right! Some smaller points ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * Nice new functions TysPrim.mkTemplateKiTyVars TysPrim.mkTemplateTyConBinders which help you make the tyvar binders for dependently-typed TyCons. See comments with their definition. * The change showed up a bug in TcGenGenerics.tc_mkRepTy, where the code was making an assumption about the order of the kind variables in the kind of GHC.Generics.(:.:). I fixed this; see TcGenGenerics.mkComp.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
With TypeInType Richard combined ForAllTy and FunTy, but that was often awkward, and yielded little benefit becuase in practice the two were always treated separately. This patch re-introduces FunTy. Specfically * New type data TyVarBinder = TvBndr TyVar VisibilityFlag This /always/ has a TyVar it. In many places that's just what what we want, so there are /lots/ of TyBinder -> TyVarBinder changes * TyBinder still exists: data TyBinder = Named TyVarBinder | Anon Type * data Type = ForAllTy TyVarBinder Type | FunTy Type Type | .... There are a LOT of knock-on changes, but they are all routine. The Haddock submodule needs to be updated too
-
- 13 Jun, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This major commit was initially triggered by #11339, but it spiraled into a major review of the way in which type signatures for bindings are handled, especially partial type signatures. On the way I fixed a number of other bugs, namely #12069 #12033 #11700 #11339 #11670 The main change is that I completely reorganised the way in which type signatures in bindings are handled. The new story is in TcSigs Note [Overview of type signatures]. Some specific: * Changes in the data types for signatures in TcRnTypes: TcIdSigInfo and new TcIdSigInst * New module TcSigs deals with typechecking type signatures and pragmas. It contains code mostly moved from TcBinds, which is already too big * HsTypes: I swapped the nesting of HsWildCardBndrs and HsImplicitBndsrs, so that the wildcards are on the oustide not the insidde in a LHsSigWcType. This is just a matter of convenient, nothing deep. There are a host of other changes as knock-on effects, and it all took FAR longer than I anticipated :-). But it is a significant improvement, I think. Lots of error messages changed slightly, some just variants but some modest improvements. New tests * typecheck/should_compile * SigTyVars: a scoped-tyvar test * ExPat, ExPatFail: existential pattern bindings * T12069 * T11700 * T11339 * partial-sigs/should_compile * T12033 * T11339a * T11670 One thing to check: * Small change to output from ghc-api/landmines. Need to check with Alan Zimmerman
-