- 06 Feb, 2013 1 commit
-
-
ian@well-typed.com authored
We now use *_range_field everywhere instead
-
- 17 Jan, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
- 24 Dec, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Residency is a very wobbly number; it depends on GC sampling time. So I don't think this is a real regression.
-
- 13 Dec, 2012 1 commit
-
-
ian@well-typed.com authored
Reason unknown. The rise was present before commit d5b5d488 Author: Ian Lynagh <ian@well-typed.com> Date: Wed Dec 12 17:12:13 2012 +0000 Use ByteString rather than FastBytes inside FastZString Slow nofib Compile Times difference looks like just noise: -1 s.d. -2.9% +1 s.d. +2.9% Average -0.1% however.
-
- 12 Nov, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 31 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
- 23 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 22 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
failures
-
- 19 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
Please folks, remember failing perf tests are not expected and should always be investigated. In particular I have no idea why T4801 is now failing - I narrowed it down to something around 30 Sep, but can't see any commits around that date that could have caused it and it has jumped by more than 10%.
-
- 08 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 04 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
ian@well-typed.com authored
Compiling with -dynamic (perhaps due to -fPIC being enabled?) seems to require significantly more allocation: =====> T1969(normal) 1 of 14 [0, 0, 0] cd . && '/home/ian/ghc/git/ghc/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' -fforce-recomp -dno-debug-output -no-user-package-db -rtsopts -fno-ghci-history -c T1969.hs +RTS -V0 -tT1969.comp.stats --machine-readable -RTS -dcore-lint >T1969.comp.stderr 2>&1 bytes allocated 669128520 is more than 1% greater than the expected value, 641959976 648379575.76 *** unexpected failure for T1969(normal) =====> T4801(normal) 3 of 14 [0, 1, 0] cd . && '/home/ian/ghc/git/ghc/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' -fforce-recomp -dno-debug-output -no-user-package-db -rtsopts -fno-ghci-history -c T4801.hs +RTS -V0 -tT4801.comp.stats --machine-readable -RTS >T4801.comp.stderr 2>&1 max_bytes_used 26928312 is more than 15% greater than the expected value, 18500000 21275000.0 peak_megabytes_allocated 66 is more than 20% greater than the expected value, 50 60.0 bytes allocated 522280144 is more than 10% greater than the expected value, 360243576 396267933.6 *** unexpected failure for T4801(normal) =====> T783(normal) 9 of 14 [0, 2, 0] cd . && '/home/ian/ghc/git/ghc/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' -fforce-recomp -dno-debug-output -no-user-package-db -rtsopts -fno-ghci-history -c T783.hs +RTS -V0 -tT783.comp.stats --machine-readable -RTS >T783.comp.stderr 2>&1 bytes allocated 506284808 is more than 10% greater than the expected value, 436927840 480620624.0 *** unexpected failure for T783(normal)
-
- 03 Oct, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
I decreased it yesterday, and now I'm putting it back up again, but not as far as it was. I'm not sure what caused these changes but it doesn't matter because this test checks that the type checker gets out of an infinite loop.
-
- 02 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
- 20 Sep, 2012 2 commits
-
-
ian@well-typed.com authored
-
ian@well-typed.com authored
-
- 17 Sep, 2012 1 commit
-
-
ian@well-typed.com authored
Some wibbles due to recent changes. Some things got better, some got worse, but nothing drastic.
-
- 31 Aug, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 30 Aug, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
- 23 Aug, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 21 Aug, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 13 Aug, 2012 1 commit
-
-
pcapriotti authored
-
- 08 Aug, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 07 Aug, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 06 Aug, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 20 Jul, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
- 16 Jul, 2012 3 commits
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
Looking at the ticky output before and after the FastString patches, the extra allocation seems to be in pprName, and looking at the core it looks like it's just caused by small differences in what does and doesn't get inlined. The actual size of the change is small: from 578940312 to 589671096.
-
Simon Marlow authored
We've been getting steadily worse on this test, this time we were hovering on the borderline and failing sometimes so I've updated the value. It is a bit worrying though.
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 05 Jul, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 28 Jun, 2012 1 commit
-
-
pcapriotti authored
-
- 23 Jun, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
Apparently GHC got faster
-
- 12 Jun, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 04 Jun, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 09 May, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
- 01 May, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 30 Apr, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
It depends too much on when GC takes place, and bounces around by 10% on this particular test.
-
- 26 Apr, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Marlow authored
-