------------------
		Simon's big commit
		------------------

This commit, which I don't think I can sensibly do piecemeal, consists
of the things I've been doing recently, mainly directed at making
Manuel, George, and Marcin happier with RULES.


Reogranise the simplifier
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. The simplifier's environment is now an explicit parameter.  This
makes it a bit easier to figure out where it is going.

2. Constructor arguments can now be arbitrary expressions, except
when the application is the RHS of a let(rec).  This makes it much
easier to match rules like

	RULES
	    "foo"  f (h x, g y) = f' x y

In the simplifier, it's Simplify.mkAtomicArgs that ANF-ises a
constructor application where necessary.  In the occurrence analyser,
there's a new piece of context info (OccEncl) to say whether a
constructor app is in a place where it should be in ANF.  (Unless
it knows this it'll give occurrence info which will inline the
argument back into the constructor app.)

3. I'm experimenting with doing the "float-past big lambda" transformation
in the full laziness pass, rather than mixed in with the simplifier (was
tryRhsTyLam).

4.  Arrange that
	case (coerce (S,T) (x,y)) of ...
will simplify.  Previous it didn't.
A local change to CoreUtils.exprIsConApp_maybe.

5. Do a better job in CoreUtils.exprEtaExpandArity when there's an
error function in one branch.


Phase numbers, RULES, and INLINE pragmas
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1.  Phase numbers decrease from N towards zero (instead of increasing).
This makes it easier to add new earlier phases, which is what users want
to do.

2.  RULES get their own phase number, N, and are disabled in phases before N.

e.g. 	{-# RULES "foo" [2] forall x y.  f (x,y) = f' x y #-}

Note the [2], which says "only active in phase 2 and later".

3.  INLINE and NOINLINE pragmas have a phase number to.  This is now treated
in just the same way as the phase number on RULE; that is, the Id is not inlined
in phases earlier than N.  In phase N and later the Id *may* be inlined, and
here is where INLINE and NOINLINE differ: INLNE makes the RHS look small, so
as soon as it *may* be inlined it probably *will* be inlined.

The syntax of the phase number on an INLINE/NOINLINE pragma has changed to be
like the RULES case (i.e. in square brackets).  This should also make sure
you examine all such phase numbers; many will need to change now the numbering
is reversed.

Inlining Ids is no longer affected at all by whether the Id appears on the
LHS of a rule.  Now it's up to the programmer to put a suitable INLINE/NOINLINE
pragma to stop it being inlined too early.


Implementation notes:

*  A new data type, BasicTypes.Activation says when a rule or inline pragma
is active.   Functions isAlwaysActive, isNeverActive, isActive, do the
obvious thing (all in BasicTypes).

* Slight change in the SimplifierSwitch data type, which led to a lot of
simplifier-specific code moving from CmdLineOpts to SimplMonad; a Good Thing.

* The InlinePragma in the IdInfo of an Id is now simply an Activation saying
when the Id can be inlined.  (It used to be a rather bizarre pair of a
Bool and a (Maybe Phase), so this is much much easier to understand.)

* The simplifier has a "mode" environment switch, replacing the old
black list.  Unfortunately the data type decl has to be in
CmdLineOpts, because it's an argument to the CoreDoSimplify switch

    data SimplifierMode = SimplGently | SimplPhase Int

Here "gently" means "no rules, no inlining".   All the crucial
inlining decisions are now collected together in SimplMonad
(preInlineUnconditionally, postInlineUnconditionally, activeInline,
activeRule).


Specialisation
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1.  Only dictionary *functions* are made INLINE, not dictionaries that
have no parameters.  (This inline-dictionary-function thing is Marcin's
idea and I'm still not sure whether it's a good idea.  But it's definitely
a Bad Idea when there are no arguments.)

2.  Be prepared to specialise an INLINE function: an easy fix in
Specialise.lhs

But there is still a problem, which is that the INLINE wins
at the call site, so we don't use the specialised version anyway.
I'm still unsure whether it makes sense to SPECIALISE something
you want to INLINE.





Random smaller things
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* builtinRules (there was only one, but may be more) in PrelRules are now
  incorporated.   They were being ignored before...

* OrdList.foldOL -->  OrdList.foldrOL, OrdList.foldlOL

* Some tidying up of the tidyOpenTyVar, tidyTyVar functions.  I've
  forgotten exactly what!