- 27 Sep, 2011 1 commit
-
-
batterseapower authored
This lets IfaceType be dumber, with fewer special cases, because deserialization for more wired-in names will work. Once we have polymorphic kinds we will be able to replace IfaceTyCon with a simple IfExtName.
-
- 23 Sep, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
and comment its invariants in Note [CoreProgram] in CoreSyn I'm not totally convinced that CoreProgram is the right name (perhaps CoreTopBinds might better), but it is useful to have a clue that you are looking at the top-level bindings. This is only a matter of a type synonym change; no deep refactoring here.
-
- 17 Sep, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
LitInteger now carries around the id of mkInteger, which it uses to construct the core to build Integer literals. This way we don't have to build in info about lots of Ids. We also no longer have any special-casing for integer-simple, so there is less code involved.
-
- 13 Sep, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
We now treat them as literals until CorePrep, when we finally convert them into the real Core representation. This makes it a lot simpler to implement built-in rules on them.
-
- 06 Sep, 2011 1 commit
-
-
batterseapower authored
Basically as documented in http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/KindFact, this patch adds a new kind Constraint such that: Show :: * -> Constraint (?x::Int) :: Constraint (Int ~ a) :: Constraint And you can write *any* type with kind Constraint to the left of (=>): even if that type is a type synonym, type variable, indexed type or so on. The following (somewhat related) changes are also made: 1. We now box equality evidence. This is required because we want to give (Int ~ a) the *lifted* kind Constraint 2. For similar reasons, implicit parameters can now only be of a lifted kind. (?x::Int#) => ty is now ruled out 3. Implicit parameter constraints are now allowed in superclasses and instance contexts (this just falls out as OK with the new constraint solver) Internally the following major changes were made: 1. There is now no PredTy in the Type data type. Instead GHC checks the kind of a type to figure out if it is a predicate 2. There is now no AClass TyThing: we represent classes as TyThings just as a ATyCon (classes had TyCons anyway) 3. What used to be (~) is now pretty-printed as (~#). The box constructor EqBox :: (a ~# b) -> (a ~ b) 4. The type LCoercion is used internally in the constraint solver and type checker to represent coercions with free variables of type (a ~ b) rather than (a ~# b)
-
- 03 Aug, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
These turn out to be a useful special case of splitTyConApp_maybe. A refactoring only; no change in behaviour
-
- 23 Jul, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
A "lifting substitition" takes a *type* to a *coercion*, using a substitution that takes a *type variable* to a *coercion*. We were using a CvSubst for this purpose, which was an awkward exception: in every other use of CvSubst, type variables map only to types. Turned out that Coercion.liftCoSubst is quite a small function, so I rewrote it with a special substitution type Coercion.LiftCoSubst, just for that purpose. In doing so I found that the function itself was bizarrely over-complicated ... a direct result of mis-using CvSubst. So this patch makes it all simpler, faster, and easier to understand. No bugs fixed though!
-
- 21 Jul, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
We used to have "loop breaker" and "non-rule loop breaker", but the unqualified version in particualr was pretty confusing. So now we have "strong loop breaker" and "weak loop breaker"; comments in BasicTypes and OccurAnal.
-
- 26 May, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
when kind-checking in Core Lint. It's unusual becuase it is poly-kinded; for example (~) Int a and (~) Maybe b are both ok. We don't want the full generality of kind polymorphism (yet anyway) so these changes in effect give (~) its own private kinding rule. It won't work right if (~) appears un-saturated, and Lint now checks for that too.
-
- 12 May, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
* Fix bugs in the packing and unpacking of data constructors with equality predicates in their types * Remove PredCo altogether; instead, coercions between predicated types (like (Eq a, [a]~b) => blah) are treated as if they were precisely their underlying representation type Eq a -> ((~) [a] b) -> blah in this case * Similarly, Type.coreView no longer treats equality predciates specially. * Implement the cast-of-coercion optimisation in Simplify.simplCoercionF Numerous other small bug-fixes and refactorings. Annoyingly, OptCoercion had Windows line endings, and this patch switches to Unix, so it looks as if every line has changed.
-
- 19 Apr, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
See the paper "Practical aspects of evidence based compilation in System FC" * Coercion becomes a data type, distinct from Type * Coercions become value-level things, rather than type-level things, (although the value is zero bits wide, like the State token) A consequence is that a coerion abstraction increases the arity by 1 (just like a dictionary abstraction) * There is a new constructor in CoreExpr, namely Coercion, to inject coercions into terms
-
- 26 Nov, 2010 2 commits
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This patch removes the Lint test, and comments why
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
See Note [WildCard binders] in SimplEnv. Spotted by Roman.
-
- 26 Oct, 2010 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
findDupsEq is quadratic, whereas removeDups is n log n. Fixes T1969 regression.
-
- 22 Oct, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This would have produced a more civilised error for Trac #4396
-
- 22 Sep, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 16 Sep, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 15 Sep, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
Using AppTy in CoreLint was giving a bogus Lint failure
-
- 13 Sep, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This major patch implements the new OutsideIn constraint solving algorithm in the typecheker, following our JFP paper "Modular type inference with local assumptions". Done with major help from Dimitrios Vytiniotis and Brent Yorgey.
-
- 03 Sep, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 27 Jul, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 12 Aug, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 24 Dec, 2009 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This patch mainly concerns the plumbing for running the passes and printing intermediate output
-
- 04 Jan, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
The main purpose of this patch is to add a bunch of new rules to the coercion optimiser. They are documented in the (revised) Appendix of the System FC paper. Some code has moved about: - OptCoercion is now a separate module, mainly because it now uses tcMatchTy, which is defined in Unify, so OptCoercion must live higehr up in the hierarchy - Functions that manipulate Kinds has moved from Type.lhs to Coercion.lhs. Reason: the function typeKind now needs to call coercionKind. And in any case, a Kind is a flavour of Type, so it builds on top of Type; indeed Coercions and Kinds are both flavours of Type. This change required fiddling with a number of imports, hence the one-line changes to otherwise-unrelated modules - The representation of CoTyCons in TyCon has changed. Instead of an extensional representation (a kind checker) there is now an intensional representation (namely TyCon.CoTyConDesc). This was needed for one of the new coercion optimisations.
-
- 19 Nov, 2009 2 commits
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
I finally got tired of the #ifdef OLD_STRICTNESS stuff. I had been keeping it around in the hope of doing old-to-new comparisions, but have failed to do so for many years, so I don't think it's going to happen. This patch deletes the clutter.
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 12 Nov, 2009 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
* Core Lint now does full checking of kinds and coercion terms which picks up kind errors in coercions that were previously simply not checked for * Coercion.lhs now provides optCoercion which optimises coercion terms. It implements all of Dimitrios's rules * The constructors for coercion terms now make no attempt to be "smart"; instead we rely solely on the coercion optimiser * CoercionTyCons in TyCon.lhs always had a "custom" kinding rule (the coKindFun field of CoercionTyCon) but its type was not clever enough to do both (a) *figure out the result kind*, assuming the whole thing is well-kinded in the first place (b) *check* the kinds of everything, failing gracefully if they aren't right. We need (b) for the new CoreLint stuff. The field now has type CoTyConKindChecker which does the job nicely.
-
- 11 Nov, 2009 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
The Core Lint warnings are new. There's only one at the moment, namely one to identify recursive INLINE things: [RHS of $c>>_als :: forall s_afT a_alJ b_alK. Cpr001_imp.StateTrans s_afT a_alJ -> Cpr001_imp.StateTrans s_afT b_alK -> Cpr001_imp.StateTrans s_afT b_alK] INLINE binder is loop breaker: $c>>_als This is definitely non-fatal, and typically gets unravelled after another simplifier run anyway. So I'm suppressing such warnings for the testsuite, when -dno-debug-output is on.
-
- 06 Nov, 2009 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
In preparation for implementing the PushC rule for coercion-swizzling in the Simplifier, I had to inmplement the three new decomposition operators for coercions, which I've called csel1, csel2, and cselR. co :: ((s1~t1) => r1) ~ ((s2~t2) => r2) --------------------------------------- csel1 co :: s1~s2 and similarly csel2, cselR. On the way I fixed the coercionKind function for types of form (s1~t2) => r2 which currently are expressed as a forall type. And I refactored quite a bit to help myself understand what is going on.
-
- 29 Oct, 2009 2 commits
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This patch has been a long time in gestation and has, as a result, accumulated some extra bits and bobs that are only loosely related. I separated the bits that are easy to split off, but the rest comes as one big patch, I'm afraid. Note that: * It comes together with a patch to the 'base' library * Interface file formats change slightly, so you need to recompile all libraries The patch is mainly giant tidy-up, driven in part by the particular stresses of the Data Parallel Haskell project. I don't expect a big performance win for random programs. Still, here are the nofib results, relative to the state of affairs without the patch Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Min -12.7% -14.5% -17.5% -17.8% Max +4.7% +10.9% +9.1% +8.4% Geometric Mean +0.9% -0.1% -5.6% -7.3% The +10.9% allocation outlier is rewrite, which happens to have a very delicate optimisation opportunity involving an interaction of CSE and inlining (see nofib/Simon-nofib-notes). The fact that the 'before' case found the optimisation is somewhat accidental. Runtimes seem to go down, but I never kno wwhether to really trust this number. Binary sizes wobble a bit, but nothing drastic. The Main Ideas are as follows. InlineRules ~~~~~~~~~~~ When you say {-# INLINE f #-} f x = <rhs> you intend that calls (f e) are replaced by <rhs>[e/x] So we should capture (\x.<rhs>) in the Unfolding of 'f', and never meddle with it. Meanwhile, we can optimise <rhs> to our heart's content, leaving the original unfolding intact in Unfolding of 'f'. So the representation of an Unfolding has changed quite a bit (see CoreSyn). An INLINE pragma gives rise to an InlineRule unfolding. Moreover, it's only used when 'f' is applied to the specified number of arguments; that is, the number of argument on the LHS of the '=' sign in the original source definition. For example, (.) is now defined in the libraries like this {-# INLINE (.) #-} (.) f g = \x -> f (g x) so that it'll inline when applied to two arguments. If 'x' appeared on the left, thus (.) f g x = f (g x) it'd only inline when applied to three arguments. This slightly-experimental change was requested by Roman, but it seems to make sense. Other associated changes * Moving the deck chairs in DsBinds, which processes the INLINE pragmas * In the old system an INLINE pragma made the RHS look like (Note InlineMe <rhs>) The Note switched off optimisation in <rhs>. But it was quite fragile in corner cases. The new system is more robust, I believe. In any case, the InlineMe note has disappeared * The workerInfo of an Id has also been combined into its Unfolding, so it's no longer a separate field of the IdInfo. * Many changes in CoreUnfold, esp in callSiteInline, which is the critical function that decides which function to inline. Lots of comments added! * exprIsConApp_maybe has moved to CoreUnfold, since it's so strongly associated with "does this expression unfold to a constructor application". It can now do some limited beta reduction too, which Roman found was an important. Instance declarations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It's always been tricky to get the dfuns generated from instance declarations to work out well. This is particularly important in the Data Parallel Haskell project, and I'm now on my fourth attempt, more or less. There is a detailed description in TcInstDcls, particularly in Note [How instance declarations are translated]. Roughly speaking we now generate a top-level helper function for every method definition in an instance declaration, so that the dfun takes a particularly stylised form: dfun a d1 d2 = MkD (op1 a d1 d2) (op2 a d1 d2) ...etc... In fact, it's *so* stylised that we never need to unfold a dfun. Instead ClassOps have a special rewrite rule that allows us to short-cut dictionary selection. Suppose dfun :: Ord a -> Ord [a] d :: Ord a Then compare (dfun a d) --> compare_list a d in one rewrite, without first inlining the 'compare' selector and the body of the dfun. To support this a) ClassOps have a BuiltInRule (see MkId.dictSelRule) b) DFuns have a special form of unfolding (CoreSyn.DFunUnfolding) which is exploited in CoreUnfold.exprIsConApp_maybe Implmenting all this required a root-and-branch rework of TcInstDcls and bits of TcClassDcl. Default methods ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you give an INLINE pragma to a default method, it should be just as if you'd written out that code in each instance declaration, including the INLINE pragma. I think that it now *is* so. As a result, library code can be simpler; less duplication. The CONLIKE pragma ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In the DPH project, Roman found cases where he had p n k = let x = replicate n k in ...(f x)...(g x).... {-# RULE f (replicate x) = f_rep x #-} Normally the RULE would not fire, because doing so involves (in effect) duplicating the redex (replicate n k). A new experimental modifier to the INLINE pragma, {-# INLINE CONLIKE replicate #-}, allows you to tell GHC to be prepared to duplicate a call of this function if it allows a RULE to fire. See Note [CONLIKE pragma] in BasicTypes Join points ~~~~~~~~~~~ See Note [Case binders and join points] in Simplify Other refactoring ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * I moved endPass from CoreLint to CoreMonad, with associated jigglings * Better pretty-printing of Core * The top-level RULES (ones that are not rules for locally-defined things) are now substituted on every simplifier iteration. I'm not sure how we got away without doing this before. This entails a bit more plumbing in SimplCore. * The necessary stuff to serialise and deserialise the new info across interface files. * Something about bottoming floats in SetLevels Note [Bottoming floats] * substUnfolding has moved from SimplEnv to CoreSubs, where it belongs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- anna +2.4% -0.5% 0.16 0.17 ansi +2.6% -0.1% 0.00 0.00 atom -3.8% -0.0% -1.0% -2.5% awards +3.0% +0.7% 0.00 0.00 banner +3.3% -0.0% 0.00 0.00 bernouilli +2.7% +0.0% -4.6% -6.9% boyer +2.6% +0.0% 0.06 0.07 boyer2 +4.4% +0.2% 0.01 0.01 bspt +3.2% +9.6% 0.02 0.02 cacheprof +1.4% -1.0% -12.2% -13.6% calendar +2.7% -1.7% 0.00 0.00 cichelli +3.7% -0.0% 0.13 0.14 circsim +3.3% +0.0% -2.3% -9.9% clausify +2.7% +0.0% 0.05 0.06 comp_lab_zift +2.6% -0.3% -7.2% -7.9% compress +3.3% +0.0% -8.5% -9.6% compress2 +3.6% +0.0% -15.1% -17.8% constraints +2.7% -0.6% -10.0% -10.7% cryptarithm1 +4.5% +0.0% -4.7% -5.7% cryptarithm2 +4.3% -14.5% 0.02 0.02 cse +4.4% -0.0% 0.00 0.00 eliza +2.8% -0.1% 0.00 0.00 event +2.6% -0.0% -4.9% -4.4% exp3_8 +2.8% +0.0% -4.5% -9.5% expert +2.7% +0.3% 0.00 0.00 fem -2.0% +0.6% 0.04 0.04 fft -6.0% +1.8% 0.05 0.06 fft2 -4.8% +2.7% 0.13 0.14 fibheaps +2.6% -0.6% 0.05 0.05 fish +4.1% +0.0% 0.03 0.04 fluid -2.1% -0.2% 0.01 0.01 fulsom -4.8% +9.2% +9.1% +8.4% gamteb -7.1% -1.3% 0.10 0.11 gcd +2.7% +0.0% 0.05 0.05 gen_regexps +3.9% -0.0% 0.00 0.00 genfft +2.7% -0.1% 0.05 0.06 gg -2.7% -0.1% 0.02 0.02 grep +3.2% -0.0% 0.00 0.00 hidden -0.5% +0.0% -11.9% -13.3% hpg -3.0% -1.8% +0.0% -2.4% ida +2.6% -1.2% 0.17 -9.0% infer +1.7% -0.8% 0.08 0.09 integer +2.5% -0.0% -2.6% -2.2% integrate -5.0% +0.0% -1.3% -2.9% knights +4.3% -1.5% 0.01 0.01 lcss +2.5% -0.1% -7.5% -9.4% life +4.2% +0.0% -3.1% -3.3% lift +2.4% -3.2% 0.00 0.00 listcompr +4.0% -1.6% 0.16 0.17 listcopy +4.0% -1.4% 0.17 0.18 maillist +4.1% +0.1% 0.09 0.14 mandel +2.9% +0.0% 0.11 0.12 mandel2 +4.7% +0.0% 0.01 0.01 minimax +3.8% -0.0% 0.00 0.00 mkhprog +3.2% -4.2% 0.00 0.00 multiplier +2.5% -0.4% +0.7% -1.3% nucleic2 -9.3% +0.0% 0.10 0.10 para +2.9% +0.1% -0.7% -1.2% paraffins -10.4% +0.0% 0.20 -1.9% parser +3.1% -0.0% 0.05 0.05 parstof +1.9% -0.0% 0.00 0.01 pic -2.8% -0.8% 0.01 0.02 power +2.1% +0.1% -8.5% -9.0% pretty -12.7% +0.1% 0.00 0.00 primes +2.8% +0.0% 0.11 0.11 primetest +2.5% -0.0% -2.1% -3.1% prolog +3.2% -7.2% 0.00 0.00 puzzle +4.1% +0.0% -3.5% -8.0% queens +2.8% +0.0% 0.03 0.03 reptile +2.2% -2.2% 0.02 0.02 rewrite +3.1% +10.9% 0.03 0.03 rfib -5.2% +0.2% 0.03 0.03 rsa +2.6% +0.0% 0.05 0.06 scc +4.6% +0.4% 0.00 0.00 sched +2.7% +0.1% 0.03 0.03 scs -2.6% -0.9% -9.6% -11.6% simple -4.0% +0.4% -14.6% -14.9% solid -5.6% -0.6% -9.3% -14.3% sorting +3.8% +0.0% 0.00 0.00 sphere -3.6% +8.5% 0.15 0.16 symalg -1.3% +0.2% 0.03 0.03 tak +2.7% +0.0% 0.02 0.02 transform +2.0% -2.9% -8.0% -8.8% treejoin +3.1% +0.0% -17.5% -17.8% typecheck +2.9% -0.3% -4.6% -6.6% veritas +3.9% -0.3% 0.00 0.00 wang -6.2% +0.0% 0.18 -9.8% wave4main -10.3% +2.6% -2.1% -2.3% wheel-sieve1 +2.7% -0.0% +0.3% -0.6% wheel-sieve2 +2.7% +0.0% -3.7% -7.5% x2n1 -4.1% +0.1% 0.03 0.04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Min -12.7% -14.5% -17.5% -17.8% Max +4.7% +10.9% +9.1% +8.4% Geometric Mean +0.9% -0.1% -5.6% -7.3%
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 01 Jul, 2009 1 commit
-
-
batterseapower authored
-
- 16 Dec, 2008 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
rolling back: Fri Dec 5 16:54:00 GMT 2008 simonpj@microsoft.com * Completely new treatment of INLINE pragmas (big patch) This is a major patch, which changes the way INLINE pragmas work. Although lots of files are touched, the net is only +21 lines of code -- and I bet that most of those are comments! HEADS UP: interface file format has changed, so you'll need to recompile everything. There is not much effect on overall performance for nofib, probably because those programs don't make heavy use of INLINE pragmas. Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed Min -11.3% -6.9% -9.2% -8.2% Max -0.1% +4.6% +7.5% +8.9% Geometric Mean -2.2% -0.2% -1.0% -0.8% (The +4.6% for on allocs is cichelli; see other patch relating to -fpass-case-bndr-to-join-points.) The old INLINE system ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The old system worked like this. A function with an INLINE pragam got a right-hand side which looked like f = __inline_me__ (\xy. e) The __inline_me__ part was an InlineNote, and was treated specially in various ways. Notably, the simplifier didn't inline inside an __inline_me__ note. As a result, the code for f itself was pretty crappy. That matters if you say (map f xs), because then you execute the code for f, rather than inlining a copy at the call site. The new story: InlineRules ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The new system removes the InlineMe Note altogether. Instead there is a new constructor InlineRule in CoreSyn.Unfolding. This is a bit like a RULE, in that it remembers the template to be inlined inside the InlineRule. No simplification or inlining is done on an InlineRule, just like RULEs. An Id can have an InlineRule *or* a CoreUnfolding (since these are two constructors from Unfolding). The simplifier treats them differently: - An InlineRule is has the substitution applied (like RULES) but is otherwise left undisturbed. - A CoreUnfolding is updated with the new RHS of the definition, on each iteration of the simplifier. An InlineRule fires regardless of size, but *only* when the function is applied to enough arguments. The "arity" of the rule is specified (by the programmer) as the number of args on the LHS of the "=". So it makes a difference whether you say {-# INLINE f #-} f x = \y -> e or f x y = e This is one of the big new features that InlineRule gives us, and it is one that Roman really wanted. In contrast, a CoreUnfolding can fire when it is applied to fewer args than than the function has lambdas, provided the result is small enough. Consequential stuff ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * A 'wrapper' no longer has a WrapperInfo in the IdInfo. Instead, the InlineRule has a field identifying wrappers. * Of course, IfaceSyn and interface serialisation changes appropriately. * Making implication constraints inline nicely was a bit fiddly. In the end I added a var_inline field to HsBInd.VarBind, which is why this patch affects the type checker slightly * I made some changes to the way in which eta expansion happens in CorePrep, mainly to ensure that *arguments* that become let-bound are also eta-expanded. I'm still not too happy with the clarity and robustness fo the result. * We now complain if the programmer gives an INLINE pragma for a recursive function (prevsiously we just ignored it). Reason for change: we don't want an InlineRule on a LoopBreaker, because then we'd have to check for loop-breaker-hood at occurrence sites (which isn't currenlty done). Some tests need changing as a result. This patch has been in my tree for quite a while, so there are probably some other minor changes. M ./compiler/basicTypes/Id.lhs -11 M ./compiler/basicTypes/IdInfo.lhs -82 M ./compiler/basicTypes/MkId.lhs -2 +2 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreFVs.lhs -2 +25 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreLint.lhs -5 +1 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CorePrep.lhs -59 +53 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreSubst.lhs -22 +31 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreSyn.lhs -66 +92 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUnfold.lhs -112 +112 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs -185 +184 M ./compiler/coreSyn/MkExternalCore.lhs -1 M ./compiler/coreSyn/PprCore.lhs -4 +40 M ./compiler/deSugar/DsBinds.lhs -70 +118 M ./compiler/deSugar/DsForeign.lhs -2 +4 M ./compiler/deSugar/DsMeta.hs -4 +3 M ./compiler/hsSyn/HsBinds.lhs -3 +3 M ./compiler/hsSyn/HsUtils.lhs -2 +7 M ./compiler/iface/BinIface.hs -11 +25 M ./compiler/iface/IfaceSyn.lhs -13 +21 M ./compiler/iface/MkIface.lhs -24 +19 M ./compiler/iface/TcIface.lhs -29 +23 M ./compiler/main/TidyPgm.lhs -55 +49 M ./compiler/parser/ParserCore.y -5 +6 M ./compiler/simplCore/CSE.lhs -2 +1 M ./compiler/simplCore/FloatIn.lhs -6 +1 M ./compiler/simplCore/FloatOut.lhs -23 M ./compiler/simplCore/OccurAnal.lhs -36 +5 M ./compiler/simplCore/SetLevels.lhs -59 +54 M ./compiler/simplCore/SimplCore.lhs -48 +52 M ./compiler/simplCore/SimplEnv.lhs -26 +22 M ./compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.lhs -28 +4 M ./compiler/simplCore/Simplify.lhs -91 +109 M ./compiler/specialise/Specialise.lhs -15 +18 M ./compiler/stranal/WorkWrap.lhs -14 +11 M ./compiler/stranal/WwLib.lhs -2 +2 M ./compiler/typecheck/Inst.lhs -1 +3 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcBinds.lhs -17 +27 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcClassDcl.lhs -1 +2 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcExpr.lhs -4 +6 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcForeign.lhs -1 +1 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcGenDeriv.lhs -14 +13 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcHsSyn.lhs -3 +2 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs -5 +4 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcRnDriver.lhs -2 +11 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs -10 +17 M ./compiler/vectorise/VectType.hs +7 Mon Dec 8 12:43:10 GMT 2008 simonpj@microsoft.com * White space only M ./compiler/simplCore/Simplify.lhs -2 Mon Dec 8 12:48:40 GMT 2008 simonpj@microsoft.com * Move simpleOptExpr from CoreUnfold to CoreSubst M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreSubst.lhs -1 +87 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUnfold.lhs -72 +1 Mon Dec 8 17:30:18 GMT 2008 simonpj@microsoft.com * Use CoreSubst.simpleOptExpr in place of the ad-hoc simpleSubst (reduces code too) M ./compiler/deSugar/DsBinds.lhs -50 +16 Tue Dec 9 17:03:02 GMT 2008 simonpj@microsoft.com * Fix Trac #2861: bogus eta expansion Urghlhl! I "tided up" the treatment of the "state hack" in CoreUtils, but missed an unexpected interaction with the way that a bottoming function simply swallows excess arguments. There's a long Note [State hack and bottoming functions] to explain (which accounts for most of the new lines of code). M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs -16 +53 Mon Dec 15 10:02:21 GMT 2008 Simon Marlow <marlowsd@gmail.com> * Revert CorePrep part of "Completely new treatment of INLINE pragmas..." The original patch said: * I made some changes to the way in which eta expansion happens in CorePrep, mainly to ensure that *arguments* that become let-bound are also eta-expanded. I'm still not too happy with the clarity and robustness fo the result. Unfortunately this change apparently broke some invariants that were relied on elsewhere, and in particular lead to panics when compiling with profiling on. Will re-investigate in the new year. M ./compiler/coreSyn/CorePrep.lhs -53 +58 M ./configure.ac -1 +1 Mon Dec 15 12:28:51 GMT 2008 Simon Marlow <marlowsd@gmail.com> * revert accidental change to configure.ac M ./configure.ac -1 +1
-
- 05 Dec, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This is a major patch, which changes the way INLINE pragmas work. Although lots of files are touched, the net is only +21 lines of code -- and I bet that most of those are comments! HEADS UP: interface file format has changed, so you'll need to recompile everything. There is not much effect on overall performance for nofib, probably because those programs don't make heavy use of INLINE pragmas. Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed Min -11.3% -6.9% -9.2% -8.2% Max -0.1% +4.6% +7.5% +8.9% Geometric Mean -2.2% -0.2% -1.0% -0.8% (The +4.6% for on allocs is cichelli; see other patch relating to -fpass-case-bndr-to-join-points.) The old INLINE system ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The old system worked like this. A function with an INLINE pragam got a right-hand side which looked like f = __inline_me__ (\xy. e) The __inline_me__ part was an InlineNote, and was treated specially in various ways. Notably, the simplifier didn't inline inside an __inline_me__ note. As a result, the code for f itself was pretty crappy. That matters if you say (map f xs), because then you execute the code for f, rather than inlining a copy at the call site. The new story: InlineRules ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The new system removes the InlineMe Note altogether. Instead there is a new constructor InlineRule in CoreSyn.Unfolding. This is a bit like a RULE, in that it remembers the template to be inlined inside the InlineRule. No simplification or inlining is done on an InlineRule, just like RULEs. An Id can have an InlineRule *or* a CoreUnfolding (since these are two constructors from Unfolding). The simplifier treats them differently: - An InlineRule is has the substitution applied (like RULES) but is otherwise left undisturbed. - A CoreUnfolding is updated with the new RHS of the definition, on each iteration of the simplifier. An InlineRule fires regardless of size, but *only* when the function is applied to enough arguments. The "arity" of the rule is specified (by the programmer) as the number of args on the LHS of the "=". So it makes a difference whether you say {-# INLINE f #-} f x = \y -> e or f x y = e This is one of the big new features that InlineRule gives us, and it is one that Roman really wanted. In contrast, a CoreUnfolding can fire when it is applied to fewer args than than the function has lambdas, provided the result is small enough. Consequential stuff ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * A 'wrapper' no longer has a WrapperInfo in the IdInfo. Instead, the InlineRule has a field identifying wrappers. * Of course, IfaceSyn and interface serialisation changes appropriately. * Making implication constraints inline nicely was a bit fiddly. In the end I added a var_inline field to HsBInd.VarBind, which is why this patch affects the type checker slightly * I made some changes to the way in which eta expansion happens in CorePrep, mainly to ensure that *arguments* that become let-bound are also eta-expanded. I'm still not too happy with the clarity and robustness fo the result. * We now complain if the programmer gives an INLINE pragma for a recursive function (prevsiously we just ignored it). Reason for change: we don't want an InlineRule on a LoopBreaker, because then we'd have to check for loop-breaker-hood at occurrence sites (which isn't currenlty done). Some tests need changing as a result. This patch has been in my tree for quite a while, so there are probably some other minor changes.
-
- 02 Oct, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 20 Sep, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This patch does a lot of tidying up of the way that dead variables are handled in Core. Just the sort of thing to do on an aeroplane. * The tricky "binder-swap" optimisation is moved from the Simplifier to the Occurrence Analyser. See Note [Binder swap] in OccurAnal. This is really a nice change. It should reduce the number of simplifier iteratoins (slightly perhaps). And it means that we can be much less pessimistic about zapping occurrence info on binders in a case expression. * For example: case x of y { (a,b) -> e } Previously, each time around, even if y,a,b were all dead, the Simplifier would pessimistically zap their OccInfo, so that we can't see they are dead any more. As a result virtually no case expression ended up with dead binders. This wasn't Bad in itself, but it always felt wrong. * I added a check to CoreLint to check that a dead binder really isn't used. That showed up a couple of bugs in CSE. (Only in this sense -- they didn't really matter.) * I've changed the PprCore printer to print "_" for a dead variable. (Use -dppr-debug to see it again.) This reduces clutter quite a bit, and of course it's much more useful with the above change. * Another benefit of the binder-swap change is that I could get rid of the Simplifier hack (working, but hacky) in which the InScopeSet was used to map a variable to a *different* variable. That allowed me to remove VarEnv.modifyInScopeSet, and to simplify lookupInScopeSet so that it doesn't look for a fixpoint. This fixes no bugs, but is a useful cleanup. * Roman pointed out that Id.mkWildId is jolly dangerous, because of its fixed unique. So I've - localied it to MkCore, where it is private (not exported) - renamed it to 'mkWildBinder' to stress that you should only use it at binding sites, unless you really know what you are doing - provided a function MkCore.mkWildCase that emodies the most common use of mkWildId, and use that elsewhere So things are much better * A knock-on change is that I found a common pattern of localising a potentially global Id, and made a function for it: Id.localiseId
-
- 31 Jul, 2008 1 commit
-
-
batterseapower authored
-
- 20 Jul, 2008 1 commit
-
-
Thomas Schilling authored
-
- 14 Jun, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 05 Jun, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This patch adds to Core the ability to say let a = Int in <body> where 'a' is a type variable. That is: a type-let. See Note [Type let] in CoreSyn. * The binding is always non-recursive * The simplifier immediately eliminates it by substitution So in effect a type-let is just a delayed substitution. This is convenient in a couple of places in the desugarer, one existing (see the call to CoreTyn.mkTyBind in DsUtils), and one that's in the next upcoming patch. The first use in the desugarer was previously encoded as (/\a. <body>) Int rather that eagerly substituting, but that was horrid because Core Lint had do "know" that a=Int inside <body> else it would bleat. Expressing it directly as a 'let' seems much nicer.
-