- 14 Sep, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 13 Sep, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This major patch implements the new OutsideIn constraint solving algorithm in the typecheker, following our JFP paper "Modular type inference with local assumptions". Done with major help from Dimitrios Vytiniotis and Brent Yorgey.
-
- 31 May, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
See Note [DFun unfoldings] in CoreSyn. The issue here is that you can't tell how many dictionary arguments a DFun needs just from looking at the Arity of the DFun Id: if the dictionary is represented by a newtype the arity might include the dictionary and value arguments of the (single) method. So we need to record the number of arguments need by the DFun in the DFunUnfolding itself. Details in Note [DFun unfoldings] in CoreSyn
-
- 20 Mar, 2010 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
- 06 Jan, 2010 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
See the long Note [INLINE and default methods]. This patch changes a couple of data types, with a knock-on effect on the format of interface files. A lot of files get touched, but is a relatively minor change. The main tiresome bit is the extra plumbing to communicate default methods between the type checker and the desugarer.
-
- 11 Dec, 2009 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
The idea is to float out bottoming expressions to top level, abstracting them over any variables they mention, if necessary. This is good because it makes functions smaller (and more likely to inline), by keeping error code out of line. See Note [Bottoming floats] in SetLevels. On the way, this fixes the HPC failures for cg059 and friends. I've been meaning to do this for some time. See Maessen's paper 1999 "Bottom extraction: factoring error handling out of functional programs" (unpublished I think). Here are the nofib results: Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Min +0.1% -7.8% -14.4% -32.5% Max +0.5% +0.2% +1.6% +13.8% Geometric Mean +0.4% -0.2% -4.9% -6.7% Module sizes -1 s.d. ----- -2.6% +1 s.d. ----- +2.3% Average ----- -0.2% Compile times: -1 s.d. ----- -11.4% +1 s.d. ----- +4.3% Average ----- -3.8% I'm think program sizes have crept up because the base library is bigger -- module sizes in nofib decrease very slightly. In turn I think that may be because the floating generates a call where there was no call before. Anyway I think it's acceptable. The main changes are: * SetLevels floats out things that exprBotStrictness_maybe identifies as bottom. Make sure to pin on the right strictness info to the newly created Ids, so that the info ends up in interface files. Since FloatOut is run twice, we have to be careful that we don't treat the function created by the first float-out as a candidate for the second; this is what worthFloating does. See SetLevels Note [Bottoming floats] Note [Bottoming floats: eta expansion] * Be careful not to inline top-level bottoming functions; this would just undo what the floating transformation achieves. See CoreUnfold Note [Do not inline top-level bottoming functions Ensuring this requires a bit of extra plumbing, but nothing drastic.. * Similarly pre/postInlineUnconditionally should be careful not to re-inline top-level bottoming things! See SimplUtils Note [Top-level botomming Ids] Note [Top level and postInlineUnconditionally]
-
- 02 Dec, 2009 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This patch collects a small raft of related changes * Arrange that during (a) rule matching and (b) uses of exprIsConApp_maybe we "look through" unfoldings only if they are active in the phase. Doing this for (a) required a bit of extra plumbing in the rule matching code, but I think it's worth it. One wrinkle is that even if inlining is off (in the 'gentle' phase of simplification) during rule matching we want to "look through" things with inlinings. See SimplUtils.activeUnfInRule. This fixes a long-standing bug, where things that were supposed to be (say) NOINLINE, could still be poked into via exprIsConApp_maybe. * In the above cases, also check for (non-rule) loop breakers; we never look through these. This fixes a bug that could make the simplifier diverge (and did for Roman). Test = simplCore/should_compile/dfun-loop * Try harder not to choose a DFun as a loop breaker. This is just a small adjustment in the OccurAnal scoring function * In the scoring function in OccurAnal, look at the InlineRule unfolding (if there is one) not the actual RHS, beause the former is what'll be inlined. * Make the application of any function to dictionary arguments CONLIKE. Thus (f d1 d2) is CONLIKE. Encapsulated in CoreUtils.isExpandableApp Reason: see Note [Expandable overloadings] in CoreUtils * Make case expressions seem slightly smaller in CoreUnfold. This reverses an unexpected consequences of charging for alternatives. Refactorings ~~~~~~~~~~~~ * Signficantly refactor the data type for Unfolding (again). The result is much nicer. * Add type synonym BasicTypes.CompilerPhase = Int and use it Many of the files touched by this patch are simply knock-on consequences of these two refactorings.
-
- 19 Nov, 2009 2 commits
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
I finally got tired of the #ifdef OLD_STRICTNESS stuff. I had been keeping it around in the hope of doing old-to-new comparisions, but have failed to do so for many years, so I don't think it's going to happen. This patch deletes the clutter.
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
The -fexpose-all-unfoldings flag arranges to put unfoldings for *everything* in the interface file. Of course, this makes the file a lot bigger, but it also makes it complete, and that's great for supercompilation; or indeed any whole-program work. Consequences: * Interface files need to record loop-breaker-hood. (Previously, loop breakers were never exposed, so that info wasn't necessary.) Hence a small interface file format change. * When inlining, must check loop-breaker-hood. (Previously, loop breakers didn't have an unfolding at all, so no need to check.) * Ditto in exprIsConApp_maybe. Roman actually tripped this bug, because a DFun, which had an unfolding, was also a loop breaker * TidyPgm.tidyIdInfo must be careful to preserve loop-breaker-hood So Id.idUnfolding checks for loop-breaker-hood and returns NoUnfolding if so. When you want the unfolding regardless of loop-breaker-hood, use Id.realIdUnfolding. I have not documented the flag yet, because it's experimental. Nor have I tested it thoroughly. But with the flag off (the normal case) everything should work.
-
- 29 Oct, 2009 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This patch has been a long time in gestation and has, as a result, accumulated some extra bits and bobs that are only loosely related. I separated the bits that are easy to split off, but the rest comes as one big patch, I'm afraid. Note that: * It comes together with a patch to the 'base' library * Interface file formats change slightly, so you need to recompile all libraries The patch is mainly giant tidy-up, driven in part by the particular stresses of the Data Parallel Haskell project. I don't expect a big performance win for random programs. Still, here are the nofib results, relative to the state of affairs without the patch Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Min -12.7% -14.5% -17.5% -17.8% Max +4.7% +10.9% +9.1% +8.4% Geometric Mean +0.9% -0.1% -5.6% -7.3% The +10.9% allocation outlier is rewrite, which happens to have a very delicate optimisation opportunity involving an interaction of CSE and inlining (see nofib/Simon-nofib-notes). The fact that the 'before' case found the optimisation is somewhat accidental. Runtimes seem to go down, but I never kno wwhether to really trust this number. Binary sizes wobble a bit, but nothing drastic. The Main Ideas are as follows. InlineRules ~~~~~~~~~~~ When you say {-# INLINE f #-} f x = <rhs> you intend that calls (f e) are replaced by <rhs>[e/x] So we should capture (\x.<rhs>) in the Unfolding of 'f', and never meddle with it. Meanwhile, we can optimise <rhs> to our heart's content, leaving the original unfolding intact in Unfolding of 'f'. So the representation of an Unfolding has changed quite a bit (see CoreSyn). An INLINE pragma gives rise to an InlineRule unfolding. Moreover, it's only used when 'f' is applied to the specified number of arguments; that is, the number of argument on the LHS of the '=' sign in the original source definition. For example, (.) is now defined in the libraries like this {-# INLINE (.) #-} (.) f g = \x -> f (g x) so that it'll inline when applied to two arguments. If 'x' appeared on the left, thus (.) f g x = f (g x) it'd only inline when applied to three arguments. This slightly-experimental change was requested by Roman, but it seems to make sense. Other associated changes * Moving the deck chairs in DsBinds, which processes the INLINE pragmas * In the old system an INLINE pragma made the RHS look like (Note InlineMe <rhs>) The Note switched off optimisation in <rhs>. But it was quite fragile in corner cases. The new system is more robust, I believe. In any case, the InlineMe note has disappeared * The workerInfo of an Id has also been combined into its Unfolding, so it's no longer a separate field of the IdInfo. * Many changes in CoreUnfold, esp in callSiteInline, which is the critical function that decides which function to inline. Lots of comments added! * exprIsConApp_maybe has moved to CoreUnfold, since it's so strongly associated with "does this expression unfold to a constructor application". It can now do some limited beta reduction too, which Roman found was an important. Instance declarations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It's always been tricky to get the dfuns generated from instance declarations to work out well. This is particularly important in the Data Parallel Haskell project, and I'm now on my fourth attempt, more or less. There is a detailed description in TcInstDcls, particularly in Note [How instance declarations are translated]. Roughly speaking we now generate a top-level helper function for every method definition in an instance declaration, so that the dfun takes a particularly stylised form: dfun a d1 d2 = MkD (op1 a d1 d2) (op2 a d1 d2) ...etc... In fact, it's *so* stylised that we never need to unfold a dfun. Instead ClassOps have a special rewrite rule that allows us to short-cut dictionary selection. Suppose dfun :: Ord a -> Ord [a] d :: Ord a Then compare (dfun a d) --> compare_list a d in one rewrite, without first inlining the 'compare' selector and the body of the dfun. To support this a) ClassOps have a BuiltInRule (see MkId.dictSelRule) b) DFuns have a special form of unfolding (CoreSyn.DFunUnfolding) which is exploited in CoreUnfold.exprIsConApp_maybe Implmenting all this required a root-and-branch rework of TcInstDcls and bits of TcClassDcl. Default methods ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you give an INLINE pragma to a default method, it should be just as if you'd written out that code in each instance declaration, including the INLINE pragma. I think that it now *is* so. As a result, library code can be simpler; less duplication. The CONLIKE pragma ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In the DPH project, Roman found cases where he had p n k = let x = replicate n k in ...(f x)...(g x).... {-# RULE f (replicate x) = f_rep x #-} Normally the RULE would not fire, because doing so involves (in effect) duplicating the redex (replicate n k). A new experimental modifier to the INLINE pragma, {-# INLINE CONLIKE replicate #-}, allows you to tell GHC to be prepared to duplicate a call of this function if it allows a RULE to fire. See Note [CONLIKE pragma] in BasicTypes Join points ~~~~~~~~~~~ See Note [Case binders and join points] in Simplify Other refactoring ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * I moved endPass from CoreLint to CoreMonad, with associated jigglings * Better pretty-printing of Core * The top-level RULES (ones that are not rules for locally-defined things) are now substituted on every simplifier iteration. I'm not sure how we got away without doing this before. This entails a bit more plumbing in SimplCore. * The necessary stuff to serialise and deserialise the new info across interface files. * Something about bottoming floats in SetLevels Note [Bottoming floats] * substUnfolding has moved from SimplEnv to CoreSubs, where it belongs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- anna +2.4% -0.5% 0.16 0.17 ansi +2.6% -0.1% 0.00 0.00 atom -3.8% -0.0% -1.0% -2.5% awards +3.0% +0.7% 0.00 0.00 banner +3.3% -0.0% 0.00 0.00 bernouilli +2.7% +0.0% -4.6% -6.9% boyer +2.6% +0.0% 0.06 0.07 boyer2 +4.4% +0.2% 0.01 0.01 bspt +3.2% +9.6% 0.02 0.02 cacheprof +1.4% -1.0% -12.2% -13.6% calendar +2.7% -1.7% 0.00 0.00 cichelli +3.7% -0.0% 0.13 0.14 circsim +3.3% +0.0% -2.3% -9.9% clausify +2.7% +0.0% 0.05 0.06 comp_lab_zift +2.6% -0.3% -7.2% -7.9% compress +3.3% +0.0% -8.5% -9.6% compress2 +3.6% +0.0% -15.1% -17.8% constraints +2.7% -0.6% -10.0% -10.7% cryptarithm1 +4.5% +0.0% -4.7% -5.7% cryptarithm2 +4.3% -14.5% 0.02 0.02 cse +4.4% -0.0% 0.00 0.00 eliza +2.8% -0.1% 0.00 0.00 event +2.6% -0.0% -4.9% -4.4% exp3_8 +2.8% +0.0% -4.5% -9.5% expert +2.7% +0.3% 0.00 0.00 fem -2.0% +0.6% 0.04 0.04 fft -6.0% +1.8% 0.05 0.06 fft2 -4.8% +2.7% 0.13 0.14 fibheaps +2.6% -0.6% 0.05 0.05 fish +4.1% +0.0% 0.03 0.04 fluid -2.1% -0.2% 0.01 0.01 fulsom -4.8% +9.2% +9.1% +8.4% gamteb -7.1% -1.3% 0.10 0.11 gcd +2.7% +0.0% 0.05 0.05 gen_regexps +3.9% -0.0% 0.00 0.00 genfft +2.7% -0.1% 0.05 0.06 gg -2.7% -0.1% 0.02 0.02 grep +3.2% -0.0% 0.00 0.00 hidden -0.5% +0.0% -11.9% -13.3% hpg -3.0% -1.8% +0.0% -2.4% ida +2.6% -1.2% 0.17 -9.0% infer +1.7% -0.8% 0.08 0.09 integer +2.5% -0.0% -2.6% -2.2% integrate -5.0% +0.0% -1.3% -2.9% knights +4.3% -1.5% 0.01 0.01 lcss +2.5% -0.1% -7.5% -9.4% life +4.2% +0.0% -3.1% -3.3% lift +2.4% -3.2% 0.00 0.00 listcompr +4.0% -1.6% 0.16 0.17 listcopy +4.0% -1.4% 0.17 0.18 maillist +4.1% +0.1% 0.09 0.14 mandel +2.9% +0.0% 0.11 0.12 mandel2 +4.7% +0.0% 0.01 0.01 minimax +3.8% -0.0% 0.00 0.00 mkhprog +3.2% -4.2% 0.00 0.00 multiplier +2.5% -0.4% +0.7% -1.3% nucleic2 -9.3% +0.0% 0.10 0.10 para +2.9% +0.1% -0.7% -1.2% paraffins -10.4% +0.0% 0.20 -1.9% parser +3.1% -0.0% 0.05 0.05 parstof +1.9% -0.0% 0.00 0.01 pic -2.8% -0.8% 0.01 0.02 power +2.1% +0.1% -8.5% -9.0% pretty -12.7% +0.1% 0.00 0.00 primes +2.8% +0.0% 0.11 0.11 primetest +2.5% -0.0% -2.1% -3.1% prolog +3.2% -7.2% 0.00 0.00 puzzle +4.1% +0.0% -3.5% -8.0% queens +2.8% +0.0% 0.03 0.03 reptile +2.2% -2.2% 0.02 0.02 rewrite +3.1% +10.9% 0.03 0.03 rfib -5.2% +0.2% 0.03 0.03 rsa +2.6% +0.0% 0.05 0.06 scc +4.6% +0.4% 0.00 0.00 sched +2.7% +0.1% 0.03 0.03 scs -2.6% -0.9% -9.6% -11.6% simple -4.0% +0.4% -14.6% -14.9% solid -5.6% -0.6% -9.3% -14.3% sorting +3.8% +0.0% 0.00 0.00 sphere -3.6% +8.5% 0.15 0.16 symalg -1.3% +0.2% 0.03 0.03 tak +2.7% +0.0% 0.02 0.02 transform +2.0% -2.9% -8.0% -8.8% treejoin +3.1% +0.0% -17.5% -17.8% typecheck +2.9% -0.3% -4.6% -6.6% veritas +3.9% -0.3% 0.00 0.00 wang -6.2% +0.0% 0.18 -9.8% wave4main -10.3% +2.6% -2.1% -2.3% wheel-sieve1 +2.7% -0.0% +0.3% -0.6% wheel-sieve2 +2.7% +0.0% -3.7% -7.5% x2n1 -4.1% +0.1% 0.03 0.04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Min -12.7% -14.5% -17.5% -17.8% Max +4.7% +10.9% +9.1% +8.4% Geometric Mean +0.9% -0.1% -5.6% -7.3%
-
- 15 Oct, 2009 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
DO NOT MERGE TO GHC 6.12 branch (Reason: interface file format change.) The typechecker needs to instantiate otherwise-unconstraint type variables to an appropriately-kinded constant type, but we didn't have a supply of arbitrarily-kinded tycons for this purpose. Now we do. The details are described in Note [Any types] in TysPrim. The fundamental change is that there is a new sort of TyCon, namely AnyTyCon, defined in TyCon. Ter's a small change to interface-file binary format, because the new AnyTyCons have to be serialised. I tided up the handling of uniques a bit too, so that mkUnique is not exported, so that we can see all the different name spaces in one module.
-
- 07 Jul, 2009 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
- 25 Jun, 2009 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
I boobed when I decoupled record selectors from their data types. The most straightforward and robust fix means attaching the TyCon of a record selector to its IfaceIdInfo, so you'll need to rebuild all .hi files That said, the fix is easy.
-
- 13 Jan, 2009 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
The deserialiser (TcIface) for associated type definitions wasn't taking into account that the class decl brings into scope some type variables that scope over the data/type family declaration. Easy to fix: the new function is TcIface.bindIfaceTyVars_AT
-
- 02 Jan, 2009 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This biggish patch addresses Trac #2670. The main effect is to make record selectors into ordinary functions, whose unfoldings appear in interface files, in contrast to their previous existence as magic "implicit Ids". This means that the usual machinery of optimisation, analysis, and inlining applies to them, which was failing before when the selector was somewhat complicated. (Which it can be when strictness annotations, unboxing annotations, and GADTs are involved.) The change involves the following points * Changes in Var.lhs to the representation of Var. Now a LocalId can have an IdDetails as well as a GlobalId. In particular, the information that an Id is a record selector is kept in the IdDetails. While compiling the current module, the record selector *must* be a LocalId, so that it participates properly in compilation (free variables etc). This led me to change the (hidden) representation of Var, so that there is now only one constructor for Id, not two. * The IdDetails is persisted into interface files, so that an importing module can see which Ids are records selectors. * In TcTyClDecls, we generate the record-selector bindings in renamed, but not typechecked form. In this way, we can get the typechecker to add all the types and so on, which is jolly helpful especially when GADTs or type families are involved. Just like derived instance declarations. This is the big new chunk of 180 lines of code (much of which is commentary). A call to the same function, mkAuxBinds, is needed in TcInstDcls for associated types. * The typechecker therefore has to pin the correct IdDetails on to the record selector, when it typechecks it. There was a neat way to do this, by adding a new sort of signature to HsBinds.Sig, namely IdSig. This contains an Id (with the correct Name, Type, and IdDetails); the type checker uses it as the binder for the final binding. This worked out rather easily. * Record selectors are no longer "implicit ids", which entails changes to IfaceSyn.ifaceDeclSubBndrs HscTypes.implicitTyThings TidyPgm.getImplicitBinds (These three functions must agree.) * MkId.mkRecordSelectorId is deleted entirely, some 300+ lines (incl comments) of very error prone code. Happy days. * A TyCon no longer contains the list of record selectors: algTcSelIds is gone The renamer is unaffected, including the way that import and export of record selectors is handled. Other small things * IfaceSyn.ifaceDeclSubBndrs had a fragile test for whether a data constructor had a wrapper. I've replaced that with an explicit flag in the interface file. More robust I hope. * I renamed isIdVar to isId, which touched a few otherwise-unrelated files.
-
- 30 Dec, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
The main bug was in TcHsType; see Note [Avoid name clashes for associated data types]. However I did a bit of re-factoring while I was abouut it. I'm still a but unhappy with the use of TyCon.setTyConArgPoss; it'd be better to construct the TyCon correctly in the first place. But that means passing an extra parameter to tcTyDecl1... maybe we should do this.
-
- 16 Dec, 2008 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
rolling back: Fri Dec 5 16:54:00 GMT 2008 simonpj@microsoft.com * Completely new treatment of INLINE pragmas (big patch) This is a major patch, which changes the way INLINE pragmas work. Although lots of files are touched, the net is only +21 lines of code -- and I bet that most of those are comments! HEADS UP: interface file format has changed, so you'll need to recompile everything. There is not much effect on overall performance for nofib, probably because those programs don't make heavy use of INLINE pragmas. Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed Min -11.3% -6.9% -9.2% -8.2% Max -0.1% +4.6% +7.5% +8.9% Geometric Mean -2.2% -0.2% -1.0% -0.8% (The +4.6% for on allocs is cichelli; see other patch relating to -fpass-case-bndr-to-join-points.) The old INLINE system ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The old system worked like this. A function with an INLINE pragam got a right-hand side which looked like f = __inline_me__ (\xy. e) The __inline_me__ part was an InlineNote, and was treated specially in various ways. Notably, the simplifier didn't inline inside an __inline_me__ note. As a result, the code for f itself was pretty crappy. That matters if you say (map f xs), because then you execute the code for f, rather than inlining a copy at the call site. The new story: InlineRules ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The new system removes the InlineMe Note altogether. Instead there is a new constructor InlineRule in CoreSyn.Unfolding. This is a bit like a RULE, in that it remembers the template to be inlined inside the InlineRule. No simplification or inlining is done on an InlineRule, just like RULEs. An Id can have an InlineRule *or* a CoreUnfolding (since these are two constructors from Unfolding). The simplifier treats them differently: - An InlineRule is has the substitution applied (like RULES) but is otherwise left undisturbed. - A CoreUnfolding is updated with the new RHS of the definition, on each iteration of the simplifier. An InlineRule fires regardless of size, but *only* when the function is applied to enough arguments. The "arity" of the rule is specified (by the programmer) as the number of args on the LHS of the "=". So it makes a difference whether you say {-# INLINE f #-} f x = \y -> e or f x y = e This is one of the big new features that InlineRule gives us, and it is one that Roman really wanted. In contrast, a CoreUnfolding can fire when it is applied to fewer args than than the function has lambdas, provided the result is small enough. Consequential stuff ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * A 'wrapper' no longer has a WrapperInfo in the IdInfo. Instead, the InlineRule has a field identifying wrappers. * Of course, IfaceSyn and interface serialisation changes appropriately. * Making implication constraints inline nicely was a bit fiddly. In the end I added a var_inline field to HsBInd.VarBind, which is why this patch affects the type checker slightly * I made some changes to the way in which eta expansion happens in CorePrep, mainly to ensure that *arguments* that become let-bound are also eta-expanded. I'm still not too happy with the clarity and robustness fo the result. * We now complain if the programmer gives an INLINE pragma for a recursive function (prevsiously we just ignored it). Reason for change: we don't want an InlineRule on a LoopBreaker, because then we'd have to check for loop-breaker-hood at occurrence sites (which isn't currenlty done). Some tests need changing as a result. This patch has been in my tree for quite a while, so there are probably some other minor changes. M ./compiler/basicTypes/Id.lhs -11 M ./compiler/basicTypes/IdInfo.lhs -82 M ./compiler/basicTypes/MkId.lhs -2 +2 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreFVs.lhs -2 +25 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreLint.lhs -5 +1 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CorePrep.lhs -59 +53 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreSubst.lhs -22 +31 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreSyn.lhs -66 +92 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUnfold.lhs -112 +112 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs -185 +184 M ./compiler/coreSyn/MkExternalCore.lhs -1 M ./compiler/coreSyn/PprCore.lhs -4 +40 M ./compiler/deSugar/DsBinds.lhs -70 +118 M ./compiler/deSugar/DsForeign.lhs -2 +4 M ./compiler/deSugar/DsMeta.hs -4 +3 M ./compiler/hsSyn/HsBinds.lhs -3 +3 M ./compiler/hsSyn/HsUtils.lhs -2 +7 M ./compiler/iface/BinIface.hs -11 +25 M ./compiler/iface/IfaceSyn.lhs -13 +21 M ./compiler/iface/MkIface.lhs -24 +19 M ./compiler/iface/TcIface.lhs -29 +23 M ./compiler/main/TidyPgm.lhs -55 +49 M ./compiler/parser/ParserCore.y -5 +6 M ./compiler/simplCore/CSE.lhs -2 +1 M ./compiler/simplCore/FloatIn.lhs -6 +1 M ./compiler/simplCore/FloatOut.lhs -23 M ./compiler/simplCore/OccurAnal.lhs -36 +5 M ./compiler/simplCore/SetLevels.lhs -59 +54 M ./compiler/simplCore/SimplCore.lhs -48 +52 M ./compiler/simplCore/SimplEnv.lhs -26 +22 M ./compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.lhs -28 +4 M ./compiler/simplCore/Simplify.lhs -91 +109 M ./compiler/specialise/Specialise.lhs -15 +18 M ./compiler/stranal/WorkWrap.lhs -14 +11 M ./compiler/stranal/WwLib.lhs -2 +2 M ./compiler/typecheck/Inst.lhs -1 +3 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcBinds.lhs -17 +27 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcClassDcl.lhs -1 +2 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcExpr.lhs -4 +6 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcForeign.lhs -1 +1 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcGenDeriv.lhs -14 +13 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcHsSyn.lhs -3 +2 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs -5 +4 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcRnDriver.lhs -2 +11 M ./compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs -10 +17 M ./compiler/vectorise/VectType.hs +7 Mon Dec 8 12:43:10 GMT 2008 simonpj@microsoft.com * White space only M ./compiler/simplCore/Simplify.lhs -2 Mon Dec 8 12:48:40 GMT 2008 simonpj@microsoft.com * Move simpleOptExpr from CoreUnfold to CoreSubst M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreSubst.lhs -1 +87 M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUnfold.lhs -72 +1 Mon Dec 8 17:30:18 GMT 2008 simonpj@microsoft.com * Use CoreSubst.simpleOptExpr in place of the ad-hoc simpleSubst (reduces code too) M ./compiler/deSugar/DsBinds.lhs -50 +16 Tue Dec 9 17:03:02 GMT 2008 simonpj@microsoft.com * Fix Trac #2861: bogus eta expansion Urghlhl! I "tided up" the treatment of the "state hack" in CoreUtils, but missed an unexpected interaction with the way that a bottoming function simply swallows excess arguments. There's a long Note [State hack and bottoming functions] to explain (which accounts for most of the new lines of code). M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs -16 +53 Mon Dec 15 10:02:21 GMT 2008 Simon Marlow <marlowsd@gmail.com> * Revert CorePrep part of "Completely new treatment of INLINE pragmas..." The original patch said: * I made some changes to the way in which eta expansion happens in CorePrep, mainly to ensure that *arguments* that become let-bound are also eta-expanded. I'm still not too happy with the clarity and robustness fo the result. Unfortunately this change apparently broke some invariants that were relied on elsewhere, and in particular lead to panics when compiling with profiling on. Will re-investigate in the new year. M ./compiler/coreSyn/CorePrep.lhs -53 +58 M ./configure.ac -1 +1 Mon Dec 15 12:28:51 GMT 2008 Simon Marlow <marlowsd@gmail.com> * revert accidental change to configure.ac M ./configure.ac -1 +1
-
- 05 Dec, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This is a major patch, which changes the way INLINE pragmas work. Although lots of files are touched, the net is only +21 lines of code -- and I bet that most of those are comments! HEADS UP: interface file format has changed, so you'll need to recompile everything. There is not much effect on overall performance for nofib, probably because those programs don't make heavy use of INLINE pragmas. Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed Min -11.3% -6.9% -9.2% -8.2% Max -0.1% +4.6% +7.5% +8.9% Geometric Mean -2.2% -0.2% -1.0% -0.8% (The +4.6% for on allocs is cichelli; see other patch relating to -fpass-case-bndr-to-join-points.) The old INLINE system ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The old system worked like this. A function with an INLINE pragam got a right-hand side which looked like f = __inline_me__ (\xy. e) The __inline_me__ part was an InlineNote, and was treated specially in various ways. Notably, the simplifier didn't inline inside an __inline_me__ note. As a result, the code for f itself was pretty crappy. That matters if you say (map f xs), because then you execute the code for f, rather than inlining a copy at the call site. The new story: InlineRules ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The new system removes the InlineMe Note altogether. Instead there is a new constructor InlineRule in CoreSyn.Unfolding. This is a bit like a RULE, in that it remembers the template to be inlined inside the InlineRule. No simplification or inlining is done on an InlineRule, just like RULEs. An Id can have an InlineRule *or* a CoreUnfolding (since these are two constructors from Unfolding). The simplifier treats them differently: - An InlineRule is has the substitution applied (like RULES) but is otherwise left undisturbed. - A CoreUnfolding is updated with the new RHS of the definition, on each iteration of the simplifier. An InlineRule fires regardless of size, but *only* when the function is applied to enough arguments. The "arity" of the rule is specified (by the programmer) as the number of args on the LHS of the "=". So it makes a difference whether you say {-# INLINE f #-} f x = \y -> e or f x y = e This is one of the big new features that InlineRule gives us, and it is one that Roman really wanted. In contrast, a CoreUnfolding can fire when it is applied to fewer args than than the function has lambdas, provided the result is small enough. Consequential stuff ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * A 'wrapper' no longer has a WrapperInfo in the IdInfo. Instead, the InlineRule has a field identifying wrappers. * Of course, IfaceSyn and interface serialisation changes appropriately. * Making implication constraints inline nicely was a bit fiddly. In the end I added a var_inline field to HsBInd.VarBind, which is why this patch affects the type checker slightly * I made some changes to the way in which eta expansion happens in CorePrep, mainly to ensure that *arguments* that become let-bound are also eta-expanded. I'm still not too happy with the clarity and robustness fo the result. * We now complain if the programmer gives an INLINE pragma for a recursive function (prevsiously we just ignored it). Reason for change: we don't want an InlineRule on a LoopBreaker, because then we'd have to check for loop-breaker-hood at occurrence sites (which isn't currenlty done). Some tests need changing as a result. This patch has been in my tree for quite a while, so there are probably some other minor changes.
-
- 30 Oct, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
This patch, written by Max Bolingbroke, does two things 1. It adds a new CoreM monad (defined in simplCore/CoreMonad), which is used as the top-level monad for all the Core-to-Core transformations (starting at SimplCore). It supports * I/O (for debug printing) * Unique supply * Statistics gathering * Access to the HscEnv, RuleBase, Annotations, Module The patch therefore refactors the top "skin" of every Core-to-Core pass, but does not change their functionality. 2. It adds a completely new facility to GHC: Core "annotations". The idea is that you can say {#- ANN foo (Just "Hello") #-} which adds the annotation (Just "Hello") to the top level function foo. These annotations can be looked up in any Core-to-Core pass, and are persisted into interface files. (Hence a Core-to-Core pass can also query the annotations of imported things.) Furthermore, a Core-to-Core pass can add new annotations (eg strictness info) of its own, which can be queried by importing modules. The design of the annotation system is somewhat in flux. It's designed to work with the (upcoming) dynamic plug-ins mechanism, but is meanwhile independently useful. Do not merge to 6.10!
-
- 23 Sep, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
We've always intended to allow you to use GADT syntax for data families: data instance T [a] where T1 :: a -> T [a] and indeed to allow data instances to *be* GADTs data intsance T [a] where T1 :: Int -> T [Int] T2 :: a -> b -> T [(a,b)] This patch fixes the renamer and type checker to allow this.
-
- 03 Oct, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
nameModule fails on an InternalName. These ASSERTS tell you which call failed.
-
- 11 Aug, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
Max Bolingbroke found this awkward bug, which relates to the way in which hs-boot files are handled. --> HEADS UP: interface file format change: recompile everything! When we import a type synonym, we want to *refrain* from looking at its RHS until we've "tied the knot" in the module being compiled. (Reason: the type synonym might ultimately loop back to the module being compiled.) To achieve this goal we need to know the *kind* of the synonym without looking at its RHS. And to do that we need its kind recorded in the interface file. I slightly refactored the way that the IfaceSyn data constructor fields work, eliminating the previous tricky re-use of the same field as either a type or a kind. See Note [Synonym kind loop] in TcIface
-
- 31 Jul, 2008 2 commits
-
-
batterseapower authored
-
batterseapower authored
-
- 20 Jul, 2008 1 commit
-
-
Thomas Schilling authored
-
- 07 Jul, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
-
- 04 May, 2008 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
- 12 Apr, 2008 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
- 29 Mar, 2008 3 commits
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
Modules that need it import it themselves instead.
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
- 06 Mar, 2008 1 commit
-
-
simonpj@microsoft.com authored
When compiling without -O we were getting code like this f x = case GHC.Base.$f20 of :DEq eq neq -> eq x x But because of the -O the $f20 dictionary is not available, so exposing the dictionary selector was useless. Yet it makes the code bigger! Better to get f x = GHC.Base.== GHC.Bsae.$f20 x x This patch suppresses the implicit unfolding for dictionary selectors when compiling without -O. We could do the same for other implicit Ids, but this will do for now. There should be no effect when compiling with -O. Programs should be smaller without -O and may run a tiny bit slower.
-
- 07 Feb, 2008 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
These fix these failures: break008(ghci) break009(ghci) break026(ghci) ghci.prog009(ghci) ghci025(ghci) print007(ghci) prog001(ghci) prog002(ghci) prog003(ghci) at least some of which have this symptom: Exception: expectJust prune
-
- 17 Jan, 2008 1 commit
-
-
twanvl authored
-
- 14 Dec, 2007 1 commit
-
-
rl@cse.unsw.edu.au authored
-
- 05 Sep, 2007 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
In fact hs-boot files had nothing to do with it: the problem was that GHCi would forget the breakpoint information for a module that had been reloaded but not recompiled. It's amazing that we never noticed this before. The ModBreaks were in the ModDetails, which was the wrong place. When we avoid recompiling a module, ModDetails is regenerated from ModIface by typecheckIface, and at that point it has no idea what the ModBreaks should be, so typecheckIface made it empty. The right place for the ModBreaks to go is with the Linkable, which is retained when compilation is avoided. So now I've placed the ModBreaks in with the CompiledByteCode, which also makes it clear that only byte-code modules have breakpoints. This fixes break022/break023
-
- 04 Sep, 2007 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
- 03 Sep, 2007 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
Older GHCs can't parse OPTIONS_GHC. This also changes the URL referenced for the -w options from WorkingConventions#Warnings to CodingStyle#Warnings for the compiler modules.
-
- 01 Sep, 2007 1 commit
-
-
Ian Lynagh authored
-
- 03 Aug, 2007 1 commit
-
-
rl@cse.unsw.edu.au authored
-