- 29 Aug, 2014 9 commits
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This was previously happening by a fluke -- they were called with those types in GHC.Real itself -- but my recent changes to specialisation mean that auto specialisations like these are not necessarily exported. Losing those specialisations made a huge difference to two performance tests perf/should_run/MethSharing perf/should_run/T9339
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Call sites are much easier to understand than before
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
I hadn't got the new function trimAutoRules quite right, so we had a left-over rule which mentioned a local variable whose binding had been discarded. (Result: crash when compiling Haddock.) This patch merges trimAutoRules into an expanded version of findExternalRules, gets it right, and adds lots of comments. See Note [Finding external rules]. And indeed in one regression test we get to trim off more rules (and hence code) than before.
-
- 28 Aug, 2014 31 commits
-
-
Sergei Trofimovich authored
No need to emit (now empty) those special markers. Markers were needed only in registerised -fvia-C mode. Signed-off-by:
Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
-
Austin Seipp authored
Signed-off-by:
Austin Seipp <austin@well-typed.com>
-
Austin Seipp authored
Signed-off-by:
Austin Seipp <austin@well-typed.com>
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
ghc-stage2: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) (GHC version 7.9.20140828 for x86_64-unknown-linux): nameModule $w$smiddle_sfx6 make[1]: *** [utils/haddock/dist/build/Haddock/Backends/Xhtml.dyn_o] Error 1
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Due to Stephanie Weirich, Dan Licata, John Hughes, Matt Might
-
Sergei Trofimovich authored
'-rdynamic' is currently only a link-time option. Does not make sense for ghci without major changes. Signed-off-by:
Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
-
Sergei Trofimovich authored
Known Issue #7297 Signed-off-by:
Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
More modular, less code. No change in behaviour.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
* T1969 improves, perhaps because of better specialiation * T5642 (a bizarre case) worsens, because we get lots and lots of specialisations of imported functions for the lots and lots of data types T5642 declares
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Doing so pushes bindings nearer their use site and hence makes them more likely to be strict. These bindings might only show up after the inlining from simplification. Example in fulsom, Csg.calc, where an arg of timesDouble thereby becomes strict. Very few programs are affected, but it's basically good news. Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed TotalMem -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- fft -0.2% +1.3% 0.06 0.06 -10.0% fulsom -0.0% -2.6% -4.3% -4.7% -6.7% simple +0.0% -0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Min -0.5% -2.6% -4.5% -4.7% -10.0% Max +0.1% +1.3% +3.3% +3.4% +2.6% Geometric Mean -0.0% -0.0% -0.6% -0.6% -0.2% The lossage in fft is the loss of detecting a common sub-expression, and can be fixed by doing earlier CSE. But that is in any case a bit of a fluke so I don't mind losing it in exchange for this more reliable gain.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
The new function TidyPgm.trimAutoRules discards bindings and rules that were useful, but now have served their purpose. See Note [Trimming auto rules] in TidyPgm
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
We were missing the free variables of rules etc. It's correct for Rec but wrong for NonRec. I'm not sure how this bug hasn't bitten us before, but it cropped up when I was doing trimAutoRules.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This flag specialises any imported overloaded function that has an unfolding, whether or not it was marked INLINEABLE. We get a lot of orphan SPEC rules as a result, but that doesn't matter provided we don't treat orphan auto-generated rules as causing the module itself to be an orphan module. See Note [Orphans and auto-generated rules] in MkIface.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
I this this arises from my de-orphaning the Enum Word instance
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Specialise liftM, foldM, etc, and make them specialisable for new monads at their call sites by using INLINEABLE
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
A class op applied to a dictionary doesn't do much work, so it's not a great idea to float it out (except possibly to the top level. See Note [Floating over-saturated applications] in SetLevels I also renamed "floatOutPartialApplications" to "floatOutOverSatApps"; the former is deeply confusing, since there is no partial application involved -- quite the reverse, it is *over* saturated.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This just avoids an unnecessary orphan instance. All the other instances for "earlier" types are in GHC.Enum already.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
These instances are quite common, so it's good to have pre-specialised versions available
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This fixes a long-standing bug: Trac #6056. The trouble was that INLINEABLE "used up" the unfolding for the Id, so it couldn't be worker/wrapper'd by the strictness analyser. This patch allows the w/w to go ahead, and makes the *worker* INLINEABLE instead, so it can later be specialised. However, that doesn't completely solve the problem, because the dictionary argument (which the specialiser treats specially) may be strict and hence unpacked by w/w, so now the worker won't be specilialised after all. Solution: never unpack dictionary arguments, which is done by the isClassTyCon test in WwLib.deepSplitProductType_maybe
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
CoreSyn.maybeUnfoldingTemplate is used mainly when specialising, so make DFunUnfoldings respond to it makes it possible to specialise them properly.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
There are two main refactorings here 1. Move the uf_arity field out of CoreUnfolding into UnfWhen It's a lot tidier there. If I've got this right, no behaviour should change. 2. Define specUnfolding and use it in DsBinds and Specialise a) commons-up some shared code b) makes sure that Specialise correctly specialises DFun unfoldings (which it didn't before) The two got put together because both ended up interacting in the specialiser. They cause zero difference to nofib.
-