- 29 Oct, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Tobias Dammers authored
The real change that fixes the ticket is described in Note [Naughty quantification candidates] in TcMType. Fixing this required reworking candidateQTyVarsOfType, the function that extracts free variables as candidates for quantification. One consequence is that we now must be more careful when quantifying: any skolems around must be quantified manually, and quantifyTyVars will now only quantify over metavariables. This makes good sense, as skolems are generally user-written and are listed in the AST. As a bonus, we now have more control over the ordering of such skolems. Along the way, this commit fixes #15711 and refines the fix to #14552 (by accepted a program that was previously rejected, as we can now accept that program by zapping variables to Any). This commit also does a fair amount of rejiggering kind inference of datatypes. Notably, we now can skip the generalization step in kcTyClGroup for types with CUSKs, because we get the kind right the first time. This commit also thus fixes #15743 and #15592, which both concern datatype kind generalisation. (#15591 is also very relevant.) For this aspect of the commit, see Note [Required, Specified, and Inferred in types] in TcTyClsDecls. Test cases: dependent/should_fail/T14880{,-2}, dependent/should_fail/T15743[cd] dependent/should_compile/T15743{,e} ghci/scripts/T15743b polykinds/T15592 dependent/should_fail/T15591[bc] ghci/scripts/T15591
-
- 24 Oct, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
We suppress some Given errors; see Note [Given errors] in TcErrors. But we must be careful not to suppress Wanted errors because of the presence of these Given errors -- else we might allow compilation to bogusly proceed The rubber hits the road in TcRnTypes.insolubleCt, where we don't want to treat Givens as insoluble, nor (and this is the new bit) Deriveds that arise from Givens. See Note [Given insolubles] in TcRnTypes. This fixes #15767.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Trac #15648 showed that GHC was a bit confused about the difference between the types for * Predicates * Coercions * Evidence (in the typechecker constraint solver) This patch cleans it up. See especially Type.hs Note [Types for coercions, predicates, and evidence] Particular changes * Coercion types (a ~# b) and (a ~#R b) are not predicate types (so isPredTy reports False for them) and are not implicitly instantiated by the type checker. This is a real change, but it consistently reflects that fact that (~#) and (~R#) really are different from predicates. * isCoercionType is renamed to isCoVarType * During type inference, simplifyInfer, we do /not/ want to infer a constraint (a ~# b), because that is no longer a predicate type. So we 'lift' it to (a ~ b). See TcType Note [Lift equality constaints when quantifying] * During type inference for pattern synonyms, we need to 'lift' provided constraints of type (a ~# b) to (a ~ b). See Note [Equality evidence in pattern synonyms] in PatSyn * But what about (forall a. Eq a => a ~# b)? Is that a predicate type? No -- it does not have kind Constraint. Is it an evidence type? Perhaps, but awkwardly so. In the end I decided NOT to make it an evidence type, and to ensure the the type inference engine never meets it. This made me /simplify/ the code in TcCanonical.makeSuperClasses; see TcCanonical Note [Equality superclasses in quantified constraints] Instead I moved the special treatment for primitive equality to TcInteract.doTopReactOther. See TcInteract Note [Looking up primitive equalities in quantified constraints] Also see Note [Evidence for quantified constraints] in Type. All this means I can have isEvVarType ty = isCoVarType ty || isPredTy ty which is nice. All in all, rather a lot of work for a small refactoring, but I think it's a real improvement.
-
- 15 Sep, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Ningning Xie authored
This patch corresponds to #15497. According to https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/DependentHaskell/Phase2, we would like to have coercion quantifications back. This will allow us to migrate (~#) to be homogeneous, instead of its current heterogeneous definition. This patch is (lots of) plumbing only. There should be no user-visible effects. An overview of changes: - Both `ForAllTy` and `ForAllCo` can quantify over coercion variables, but only in *Core*. All relevant functions are updated accordingly. - Small changes that should be irrelevant to the main task: 1. removed dead code `mkTransAppCo` in Coercion 2. removed out-dated Note Computing a coercion kind and roles in Coercion 3. Added `Eq4` in Note Respecting definitional equality in TyCoRep, and updated `mkCastTy` accordingly. 4. Various updates and corrections of notes and typos. - Haddock submodule needs to be changed too. Acknowledgments: This work was completed mostly during Ningning Xie's Google Summer of Code, sponsored by Google. It was advised by Richard Eisenberg, supported by NSF grant 1704041. Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: goldfire, simonpj, bgamari, hvr, erikd, simonmar Subscribers: RyanGlScott, monoidal, rwbarton, carter GHC Trac Issues: #15497 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D5054
-
- 24 Aug, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This patch fixes Trac #15558. There turned out to be two distinct problems * In TcExpr.tc_poly_expr_nc we had tc_poly_expr_nc (L loc expr) res_ty = do { traceTc "tcPolyExprNC" (ppr res_ty) ; (wrap, expr') <- tcSkolemiseET GenSigCtxt res_ty $ \ res_ty -> setSrcSpan loc $ -- NB: setSrcSpan *after* skolemising, -- so we get better skolem locations tcExpr expr res_ty Putting the setSrcSpan inside the tcSkolemise means that the location on the Implication constraint is the /call/ to the function rather than the /argument/ to the call, and that is really quite wrong. I don't know what Richard's comment NB means -- I moved the setSrcSpan outside, and the "binding site" info in error messages actually improved. The reason I found this is that it affects the span reported for Trac #15558. * In TcErrors.mkGivenErrorReporter we carefully munge the location for an insoluble Given constraint (Note [Inaccessible code]). But the 'implic' passed in wasn't necesarily the immediately- enclosing implication -- but for location-munging purposes it jolly well should be. Solution: use the innermost implication. This actually simplifies the code -- no need to pass an implication in to mkGivenErrorReporter.
-
- 23 Aug, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
In this patch commit 6eabb6dd Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com> Date: Tue Dec 15 14:26:13 2015 +0000 Allow recursive (undecidable) superclasses I changed (transSuperClasses p) to return only the superclasses of p, but not p itself. (Previously it always returned p as well.) The use of transSuperClasses in TcErrors.warnRedundantConstraints really needs 'p' in the result -- but I faild to fix this call site, and instead crippled the test for Trac #10100. This patch sets things right * Accomodates the API change * Re-enables T10100 * And thereby fixes Trac #11474
-
- 20 Aug, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
In TcErrors, cec_suppress is used to suppress low-priority errors in favour of truly insoluble ones. But I was failing to initialise it correcly at top level, which resulted in Trac #15539. Easy to fix. A few regression tests have fewer errors reported, but that seems to be an improvement.
-
- 17 Aug, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Joachim Breitner authored
because since #15050, these are no longer used in pattern SIGnatures, but still in other places where meta-variables should only be unified with TYpe VARiables. I also found mentions of `SigTv` in parts of the renamer and desugarer that do not seem to directly relate to `SigTv` as used in the type checker, but rather to uses of `forall a.` in type signatures. I renamed these to `ScopedTv`. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D5074
-
- 12 Aug, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Ryan Scott authored
Summary: When GHC reports that it cannot solve a constraint in error messages, it often reports what given constraints it has in scope. Unfortunately, sometimes redundant constraints (like `* ~ *`, from #15361) can sneak in. The fix is simple: blast away these redundant constraints using `mkMinimalBySCs`. Test Plan: make test TEST=T15361 Reviewers: simonpj, bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie, carter GHC Trac Issues: #15361 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D5002
-
- 25 Jul, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
The cloneWC, cloneWanted, cloneImplication family are used by * TcHoleErrors * TcRule to clone the /bindings/ in a constraint, so that solving the constraint will not add bindings to the program. The idea is only to affect unifications. But I had it wrong -- I failed to clone the EvBindsVar of an implication. That gave an assert failure, I think, as well as useless dead code. The fix is easy. I'm not adding a test case. In the type 'TcEvidence.EvBindsVar', I also renamed the 'NoEvBindsVar' constructor to 'CoEvBindsVar'. It's not that we have /no/ evidence bindings, just that we can only have coercion bindings, done via HoleDest.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
It turned out that we were not being consistent about our use of isConstraintKind. It's delicate, because the typechecker treats Constraint and Type as /distinct/, whereas they are the /same/ in the rest of the compiler (Trac #11715). And had it wrong, which led to Trac #15412. This patch does the following: * Rename isConstraintKind to tcIsConstraintKind returnsConstraintKind to tcReturnsConstraintKind to emphasise that they use the 'tcView' view of types. * Move these functions, and some related ones (tcIsLiftedTypeKind), from Kind.hs, to group together in Type.hs, alongside isPredTy. It feels very unsatisfactory that these 'tcX' functions live in Type, but it happens because isPredTy is called later in the compiler too. But it's a consequence of the 'Constraint vs Type' dilemma.
-
- 24 Jul, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Ryan Scott authored
Summary: It's rather unfortunate that derived code can produce inaccessible code warnings (as demonstrated in #8128, #8740, and #15398), since the programmer has no control over the generated code. This patch aims to suppress `-Winaccessible-code` in all derived code. It accomplishes this by doing the following: * Generalize the `ic_env :: TcLclEnv` field of `Implication` to be of type `Env TcGblEnc TcLclEnv` instead. This way, it also captures `DynFlags`, which record the flag state at the time the `Implication` was created. * When typechecking derived code, turn off `-Winaccessible-code`. This way, any insoluble given `Implication`s that are created when typechecking this derived code will remember that `-Winaccessible-code` was disabled. * During error reporting, consult the `DynFlags` of an `Implication` before making the decision to report an inaccessible code warning. Test Plan: make test TEST="T8128 T8740 T15398" Reviewers: simonpj, bgamari Reviewed By: simonpj Subscribers: monoidal, rwbarton, thomie, carter GHC Trac Issues: #8128, #8740, #15398 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4993
-
- 08 Jun, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
Summary: This fixes #15232, where we would warn about `TypeError` constraints being redundant. Test Plan: Validate Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie, carter GHC Trac Issues: #15232 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4808
-
- 04 Jun, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
We have wanted quantified constraints for ages and, as I hoped, they proved remarkably simple to implement. All the machinery was already in place. The main ticket is Trac #2893, but also relevant are #5927 #8516 #9123 (especially! higher kinded roles) #14070 #14317 The wiki page is https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/QuantifiedConstraints which in turn contains a link to the GHC Proposal where the change is specified. Here is the relevant Note: Note [Quantified constraints] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The -XQuantifiedConstraints extension allows type-class contexts like this: data Rose f x = Rose x (f (Rose f x)) instance (Eq a, forall b. Eq b => Eq (f b)) => Eq (Rose f a) where (Rose x1 rs1) == (Rose x2 rs2) = x1==x2 && rs1 >= rs2 Note the (forall b. Eq b => Eq (f b)) in the instance contexts. This quantified constraint is needed to solve the [W] (Eq (f (Rose f x))) constraint which arises form the (==) definition. Here are the moving parts * Language extension {-# LANGUAGE QuantifiedConstraints #-} and add it to ghc-boot-th:GHC.LanguageExtensions.Type.Extension * A new form of evidence, EvDFun, that is used to discharge such wanted constraints * checkValidType gets some changes to accept forall-constraints only in the right places. * Type.PredTree gets a new constructor ForAllPred, and and classifyPredType analyses a PredType to decompose the new forall-constraints * Define a type TcRnTypes.QCInst, which holds a given quantified constraint in the inert set * TcSMonad.InertCans gets an extra field, inert_insts :: [QCInst], which holds all the Given forall-constraints. In effect, such Given constraints are like local instance decls. * When trying to solve a class constraint, via TcInteract.matchInstEnv, use the InstEnv from inert_insts so that we include the local Given forall-constraints in the lookup. (See TcSMonad.getInstEnvs.) * topReactionsStage calls doTopReactOther for CIrredCan and CTyEqCan, so they can try to react with any given quantified constraints (TcInteract.matchLocalInst) * TcCanonical.canForAll deals with solving a forall-constraint. See Note [Solving a Wanted forall-constraint] Note [Solving a Wanted forall-constraint] * We augment the kick-out code to kick out an inert forall constraint if it can be rewritten by a new type equality; see TcSMonad.kick_out_rewritable Some other related refactoring ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * Move SCC on evidence bindings to post-desugaring, which fixed #14735, and is generally nicer anyway because we can use existing CoreSyn free-var functions. (Quantified constraints made the free-vars of an ev-term a bit more complicated.) * In LookupInstResult, replace GenInst with OneInst and NotSure, using the latter for multiple matches and/or one or more unifiers
-
- 03 Jun, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Tobias Dammers authored
With GADTs, it is possible to write programs such that the type constraints make some code branches inaccessible. Take, for example, the following program :: {-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-} data Foo a where Foo1 :: Foo Char Foo2 :: Foo Int data TyEquality a b where Refl :: TyEquality a a checkTEQ :: Foo t -> Foo u -> Maybe (TyEquality t u) checkTEQ x y = error "unimportant" step2 :: Bool step2 = case checkTEQ Foo1 Foo2 of Just Refl -> True -- Inaccessible code Nothing -> False Clearly, the `Just Refl` case cannot ever be reached, because the `Foo1` and `Foo2` constructors say `t ~ Char` and `u ~ Int`, while the `Refl` constructor essentially mandates `t ~ u`, and thus `Char ~ Int`. Previously, GHC would reject such programs entirely; however, in practice this is too harsh. Accepting such code does little harm, since attempting to use the "impossible" code will still produce errors down the chain, while rejecting it means we cannot legally write or generate such code at all. Hence, we turn the error into a warning, and provide `-Winaccessible-code` to control GHC's behavior upon encountering this situation. Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie, carter GHC Trac Issues: #11066 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4744
-
- 30 May, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Matthías Páll Gissurarson authored
I've changed the name from `Valid substitutions` to `Valid hole fits`, since "substitution" already has a well defined meaning within the theory. As part of this change, the flags and output is reanamed, with substitution turning into hole-fit in most cases. "hole fit" was already used internally in the code, it's clear and shouldn't cause any confusion. In this update, I've also reworked how we manage side-effects in the hole we are considering. This allows us to consider local bindings such as where clauses and arguments to functions, suggesting e.g. `a` for `head (x:xs) where head :: [a] -> a`. It also allows us to find suggestions such as `maximum` for holes of type `Ord a => a -> [a]`, and `max` when looking for a match for the hole in `g = foldl1 _`, where `g :: Ord a => [a] -> a`. We also show much improved output for refinement hole fits, and fixes #14990. We now show the correct type of the function, but we also now show what the arguments to the function should be e.g. `foldl1 (_ :: Integer -> Integer -> Integer)` when looking for `[Integer] -> Integer`. I've moved the bulk of the code from `TcErrors.hs` to a new file, `TcHoleErrors.hs`, since it was getting too big to not live on it's own. This addresses the considerations raised in #14969, and takes proper care to set the `tcLevel` of the variables to the right level before passing it to the simplifier. We now also zonk the suggestions properly, which improves the output of the refinement hole fits considerably. This also filters out suggestions from the `GHC.Err` module, since even though `error` and `undefined` are indeed valid hole fits, they are "trivial", and almost never useful to the user. We now find the hole fits using the proper manner, namely by solving nested implications. This entails that the givens are passed along using the implications the hole was nested in, which in turn should mean that there will be fewer weird bugs in the typed holes. I've also added a new sorting method (as suggested by SPJ) and sort by the size of the types needed to turn the hole fits into the type of the hole. This gives a reasonable approximation to relevance, and is much faster than the subsumption check. I've also added a flag to toggle whether to use this new sorting algorithm (as is done by default) or the subsumption algorithm. This fixes #14969 I've also added documentation for these new flags and update the documentation according to the new output. Reviewers: bgamari, goldfire Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: simonpj, rwbarton, thomie, carter GHC Trac Issues: #14969, #14990, #10946 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4444
-
- 18 May, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Trac #15009 showed that, for Given TyVar/TyVar equalities, we really want to orient them with the deepest-bound skolem on the left. As it happens, we also want to do the same for Wanteds, but for a different reason (more likely to be touchable). Either way, deepest wins: see TcUnify Note [Deeper level on the left]. This observation led me to some significant changes: * A SkolemTv already had a TcLevel, but the level wasn't really being used. Now it is! * I updated added invariant (SkolInf) to TcType Note [TcLevel and untouchable type variables], documenting that the level number of all the ic_skols should be the same as the ic_tclvl of the implication * FlatSkolTvs and FlatMetaTvs previously had a dummy level-number of zero, which messed the scheme up. Now they get a level number the same way as all other TcTyVars, instead of being a special case. * To make sure that FlatSkolTvs and FlatMetaTvs are untouchable (which was previously done via their magic zero level) isTouchableMetaTyVar just tests for those two cases. * TcUnify.swapOverTyVars is the crucial orientation function; see the new Note [TyVar/TyVar orientation]. I completely rewrote this function, and it's now much much easier to understand. I ended up doing some related refactoring, of course * I noticed that tcImplicitTKBndrsX and tcExplicitTKBndrsX were doing a lot of useless work in the case where there are no skolems; I added a fast-patch * Elminate the un-used tcExplicitTKBndrsSig; and thereby get rid of the higher-order parameter to tcExpliciTKBndrsX. * Replace TcHsType.emitTvImplication with TcUnify.checkTvConstraints, by analogy with TcUnify.checkConstraints. * Inline TcUnify.buildImplication into its only call-site in TcUnify.checkConstraints * TcS.buildImplication becomes TcS.CheckConstraintsTcS, with a simpler API * Now that we have NoEvBindsVar we have no need of termEvidenceAllowed; nuke the latter, adding Note [No evidence bindings] to TcEvidence.
-
- 16 May, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Ryan Scott authored
GHC previously had a handful of special cases for pretty-printing equalities in a more user-friendly manner, but they were far from comprehensive (see #15039 for an example of where this fell apart). This patch makes the pretty-printing of equalities much more systematic. I've adopted the approach laid out in https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/15039#comment:4, and updated `Note [Equality predicates in IfaceType]` accordingly. We are now more careful to respect the properties of the `-fprint-explicit-kinds` and `-fprint-equality-relations` flags, which led to some improvements in error message outputs. Along the way, I also tweaked the error-reporting machinery not to print out the type of a typed hole when the type is an unlifted equality, since it's kind (`TYPE ('TupleRep '[])`) was more confusing than anything. Test Plan: make test TEST="T15039a T15039b T15039c T15039d" Reviewers: simonpj, goldfire, bgamari Reviewed By: simonpj Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie, carter GHC Trac Issues: #15039 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4696
-
- 15 May, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Trac #15152 showed that when a flag turned an error into a warning, we were still (alas) suppressing subequent errors; includign their essential addTcEvBind. That led (rightly) to a Lint error. This patch fixes it, and incidentally tidies up an ad-hoc special case of out-of-scope variables (see the old binding for 'out_of_scope_killer' in 'tryReporters'). No test, because the problem was only shown up when turning inaccessible code into a warning.
-
- 27 Apr, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Generally, when the type checker reports an error, more serious ones suppress less serious ones. A "variable out of scope" error is arguably the most serious of all, so this patch moves it to the front of the list instead of the end. This patch also fixes Trac #14149, which had -fdefer-out-of-scope-variables, but also had a solid type error. As things stood, the type error was not reported at all, and compilation "succeeded" with error code 0. Yikes. Note that - "Hole errors" (including out of scope) are never suppressed. (maybeReportHoleError vs maybeReportError in TcErorrs) They can just get drowned by the noise. - But with the new orientation, out of scope errors will suppress type errors. That would be easy to change.
-
- 01 Apr, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Richard Eisenberg authored
The main job of this commit is to track more accurately the scope of tyvars introduced by user-written foralls. For example, it would be to have something like this: forall a. Int -> (forall k (b :: k). Proxy '[a, b]) -> Bool In that type, a's kind must be k, but k isn't in scope. We had a terrible way of doing this before (not worth repeating or describing here, but see the old tcImplicitTKBndrs and friends), but now we have a principled approach: make an Implication when kind-checking a forall. Doing so then hooks into the existing machinery for preventing skolem-escape, performing floating, etc. This also means that we bump the TcLevel whenever going into a forall. The new behavior is done in TcHsType.scopeTyVars, but see also TcHsType.tc{Im,Ex}plicitTKBndrs, which have undergone significant rewriting. There are several Notes near there to guide you. Of particular interest there is that Implication constraints can now have skolems that are out of order; this situation is reported in TcErrors. A major consequence of this is a slightly tweaked process for type- checking type declarations. The new Note [Use SigTvs in kind-checking pass] in TcTyClsDecls lays it out. The error message for dependent/should_fail/TypeSkolEscape has become noticeably worse. However, this is because the code in TcErrors goes to some length to preserve pre-8.0 error messages for kind errors. It's time to rip off that plaster and get rid of much of the kind-error-specific error messages. I tried this, and doing so led to a lovely error message for TypeSkolEscape. So: I'm accepting the error message quality regression for now, but will open up a new ticket to fix it, along with a larger error-message improvement I've been pondering. This applies also to dependent/should_fail/{BadTelescope2,T14066,T14066e}, polykinds/T11142. Other minor changes: - isUnliftedTypeKind didn't look for tuples and sums. It does now. - check_type used check_arg_type on both sides of an AppTy. But the left side of an AppTy isn't an arg, and this was causing a bad error message. I've changed it to use check_type on the left-hand side. - Some refactoring around when we print (TYPE blah) in error messages. The changes decrease the times when we do so, to good effect. Of course, this is still all controlled by -fprint-explicit-runtime-reps Fixes #14066 #14749 Test cases: dependent/should_compile/{T14066a,T14749}, dependent/should_fail/T14066{,c,d,e,f,g,h}
-
- 23 Mar, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Ryan Scott authored
Summary: At its core, this patch is a simple tweak that allows a user to write: ```lang=haskell deriving instance _ => Eq (Foo a) ``` Which is functionally equivalent to: ```lang=haskell data Foo a = ... deriving Eq ``` But with the added flexibility that `StandaloneDeriving` gives you (namely, the ability to use it anywhere, not just in the same module that `Foo` was declared in). This fixes #13324, and should hopefully address a use case brought up in #10607. Currently, only the use of a single, extra-constraints wildcard is permitted in a standalone deriving declaration. Any other wildcard is rejected, so things like `deriving instance (Eq a, _) => Eq (Foo a)` are currently forbidden. There are quite a few knock-on changes brought on by this change: * The `HsSyn` type used to represent standalone-derived instances was previously `LHsSigType`, which isn't sufficient to hold wildcard types. This needed to be changed to `LHsSigWcType` as a result. * Previously, `DerivContext` was a simple type synonym for `Maybe ThetaType`, under the assumption that you'd only ever be in the `Nothing` case if you were in a `deriving` clause. After this patch, that assumption no longer holds true, as you can also be in this situation with standalone deriving when an extra-constraints wildcard is used. As a result, I changed `DerivContext` to be a proper datatype that reflects the new wrinkle that this patch adds, and plumbed this through the relevant parts of `TcDeriv` and friends. * Relatedly, the error-reporting machinery in `TcErrors` also assumed that if you have any unsolved constraints in a derived instance, then you should be able to fix it by switching over to standalone deriving. This was always sound advice before, but with this new feature, it's possible to have unsolved constraints even when you're standalone-deriving something! To rectify this, I tweaked some constructors of `CtOrigin` a bit to reflect this new subtlety. This requires updating the Haddock submodule. See my fork at https://github.com/RyanGlScott/haddock/commit/067d52fd4be15a1842cbb05f42d9d482de0ad3a7 Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: simonpj, goldfire, bgamari Reviewed By: simonpj Subscribers: goldfire, rwbarton, thomie, mpickering, carter GHC Trac Issues: #13324 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4383
-
- 18 Feb, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Matthías Páll Gissurarson authored
This adds valid refinement substitution suggestions for typed holes and documentation thereof. Inspired by Agda's refinement facilities, this extends the typed holes feature to be able to search for valid refinement substitutions, which are substitutions that have one or more holes in them. When the flag `-frefinement-level-substitutions=n` where `n > 0` is passed, we also look for valid refinement substitutions, i.e. substitutions that are valid, but adds more holes. Consider the following: f :: [Integer] -> Integer f = _ Here the valid substitutions suggested will be (with the new `-funclutter-valid-substitutions` flag for less verbosity set): ``` Valid substitutions include f :: [Integer] -> Integer product :: forall (t :: * -> *). Foldable t => forall a. Num a => t a -> a sum :: forall (t :: * -> *). Foldable t => forall a. Num a => t a -> a maximum :: forall (t :: * -> *). Foldable t => forall a. Ord a => t a -> a minimum :: forall (t :: * -> *). Foldable t => forall a. Ord a => t a -> a head :: forall a. [a] -> a (Some substitutions suppressed; use -fmax-valid-substitutions=N or -fno-max-valid-substitutions) ``` When the `-frefinement-level-substitutions=1` flag is given, we additionally compute and report valid refinement substitutions: ``` Valid refinement substitutions include foldl1 _ :: forall (t :: * -> *). Foldable t => forall a. (a -> a -> a) -> t a -> a foldr1 _ :: forall (t :: * -> *). Foldable t => forall a. (a -> a -> a) -> t a -> a head _ :: forall a. [a] -> a last _ :: forall a. [a] -> a error _ :: forall (a :: TYPE r). GHC.Stack.Types.HasCallStack => [Char] -> a errorWithoutStackTrace _ :: forall (a :: TYPE r). [Char] -> a (Some refinement substitutions suppressed; use -fmax-refinement-substitutions=N or -fno-max-refinement-substitutions) ``` Which are substitutions with holes in them. This allows e.g. beginners to discover the fold functions and similar. We find these refinement suggestions by considering substitutions that don't fit the type of the hole, but ones that would fit if given an additional argument. We do this by creating a new type variable with newOpenFlexiTyVarTy (e.g. `t_a1/m[tau:1]`), and then considering substitutions of the type `t_a1/m[tau:1] -> v` where `v` is the type of the hole. Since the simplifier is free to unify this new type variable with any type (and it is cloned before each check to avoid side-effects), we can now discover any identifiers that would fit if given another identifier of a suitable type. This is then generalized so that we can consider any number of additional arguments by setting the `-frefinement-level-substitutions` flag to any number, and then considering substitutions like e.g. `foldl _ _` with two additional arguments. This can e.g. help beginners discover the `fold` functions. This could also help more advanced users figure out which morphisms they can use when arrow chasing. Then you could write `m = _ . m2 . m3` where `m2` and `m3` are some morphisms, and not only get exact fits, but also help in finding morphisms that might get you a little bit closer to where you want to go in the diagram. Reviewers: bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie, carter Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4357
-
- 08 Feb, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
When finishing up an implication constraint, it's a bit tricky to decide which Derived constraints to retain (for error reporting) and which to discard. I got this wrong in commit f20cf982 (Remove wc_insol from WantedConstraints) The particular problem in Trac #14763 was that we were reporting as an error a fundep-generated constraint (ex ~ T) where 'ex' is an existentially-bound variable in a pattern match. But this isn't really an error at all. This patch fixes the problem. Indeed, since I had to understand this rather tricky code, I took the opportunity to clean it up and document better. See isDroppableCt :: Ct -> Bool and Note [Dropping derived constraints] I also removed wl_deriv altogether from the WorkList data type. It was there in the hope of gaining efficiency by not even processing lots of derived constraints, but it has turned out that most derived constraints (notably equalities) must be processed anyway; see Note [Prioritise equalities] in TcSMonad. The two are coupled because to decide which constraints to put in wl_deriv I was using another variant of isDroppableCt. Now it's much simpler -- and perhaps even more efficient too.
-
- 26 Jan, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Matthías Páll Gissurarson authored
This is an initial attempt at tackling the issue of how to order the suggestions provided by the valid substitutions checker, by sorting them by creating a graph of how they subsume each other. We'd like to order them in such a manner that the most "relevant" suggestions are displayed first, so that the suggestion that the user might be looking for is displayed before more far-fetched suggestions (and thus also displayed when they'd otherwise be cut-off by the `-fmax-valid-substitutions` limit). The previous ordering was based on the order in which the elements appear in the list of imports, which I believe is less correlated with relevance than this ordering. A drawback of this approach is that, since we now want to sort the elements, we can no longer "bail out early" when we've hit the `-fmax-valid-substitutions` limit. Reviewers: bgamari, dfeuer Reviewed By: dfeuer Subscribers: dfeuer, rwbarton, thomie, carter Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4326
-
Joachim Breitner authored
Ideally, I'd like to do type EvTerm = CoreExpr and the type checker builds the evidence terms as it goes. This failed, becuase the evidence for `Typeable` refers to local identifiers that are added *after* the typechecker solves constraints. Therefore, `EvTerm` stays a data type with two constructors: `EvExpr` for `CoreExpr` evidence, and `EvTypeable` for the others. Delted `Note [Memoising typeOf]`, its reference (and presumably relevance) was removed in 8fa4bf9a. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4341
-
- 18 Jan, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Matthías Páll Gissurarson authored
This implements SPJ's suggestion on the ticket (#14273). We find the relevant constraints (ones that whose free unification variables are all mentioned in the type of the hole), and then clone the free unification variables of the hole and the relevant constraints. We then add a subsumption constraints and run the simplifier, and then check whether all the constraints were solved. Reviewers: bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: RyanGlScott, rwbarton, thomie, carter GHC Trac Issues: #14273 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4315
-
- 03 Jan, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
As Trac #14605 showed, we can't defer a type error under a 'forall' (when unifying two forall types). The fix is simple.
-
- 21 Dec, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
In fixing Trac #14584 I found that it would be /much/ more convenient if a "hole" in a coercion (much like a unification variable in a type) acutally had a CoVar associated with it rather than just a Unique. Then I can ask what the free variables of a coercion is, and get a set of CoVars including those as-yet-un-filled in holes. Once that is done, it makes no sense to stuff coercion holes inside UnivCo. They were there before so we could know the kind and role of a "hole" coercion, but once there is a CoVar we can get that info from the CoVar. So I removed HoleProv from UnivCoProvenance and added HoleCo to Coercion. In summary: * Add HoleCo to Coercion and remove HoleProv from UnivCoProvanance * Similarly in IfaceCoercion * Make CoercionHole have a CoVar in it, not a Unique * Make tyCoVarsOfCo return the free coercion-hole variables as well as the ordinary free CoVars. Similarly, remember to zonk the CoVar in a CoercionHole We could go further, and remove CoercionHole as a distinct type altogther, just collapsing it into HoleCo. But I have not done that yet.
-
- 19 Dec, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Gabor Greif authored
-
- 08 Nov, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Trac #14394 showed that it's possible to get redundant constraints in the inferred provided constraints of a pattern synonym. This patch removes the redundancy with mkMinimalBySCs. To do this I had to generalise the type of mkMinimalBySCs slightly. And, to reduce confusing reversal, I made it stable: it now returns its result in the same order as its input. That led to a raft of error message wibbles, mostly for the better.
-
- 19 Oct, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ryan Scott authored
Summary: Previously, GHC would always raise the possibility that a type family might not be injective in certain error messages, even if that type family actually //was// injective. Fix this by actually checking for a type family's lack of injectivity before emitting such an error message. Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: goldfire, austin, bgamari, simonpj Reviewed By: simonpj Subscribers: simonpj, rwbarton, thomie GHC Trac Issues: #14369 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4106
-
- 11 Oct, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This patch is a pure refactoring, which I've wanted to do for some time. The main payload is * Remove the wc_insol field from WantedConstraints; instead put all the insolubles in wc_simple * Remove inert_insols from InertCans Instead put all the insolubles in inert_irreds * Add a cc_insol flag to CIrredCan, to record that the constraint is definitely insoluble Reasons * Quite a bit of code gets slightly simpler * Fewer concepts to keep separate * Insolubles don't happen at all in production code that is just being recompiled, so previously there was a lot of moving-about of empty sets A couple of error messages acutally improved.
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
- 25 Sep, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This patch does two things: * When reporting a hole, we now include its kind if the kind is not just '*'. This addresses Trac #14265 * When reporting things like "'a' is a rigid type varaible bound by ...", this patch arranges to group the type variables together, so we don't repeat the "bound by..." stuff endlessly
-
- 21 Sep, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Matthías Páll Gissurarson authored
This builds on the previous "Valid substitutions include..." functionality, but add subsumption checking as well, so that the suggested valid substitutions show not only exact matches, but also identifiers that fit the hole by virtue of subsuming the type of the hole (i.e. being more general than the type of the hole). Building on the previous example, in the given program ``` ps :: String -> IO () ps = putStrLn ps2 :: a -> IO () ps2 _ = putStrLn "hello, world" main :: IO () main = _ "hello, world" ``` The results would be something like ``` • Found hole: _ :: [Char] -> IO () • In the expression: _ In the expression: _ "hello, world" In an equation for ‘main’: main = _ "hello, world" • Relevant bindings include main :: IO () (bound at t1.hs:8:1) Valid substitutions include ps :: String -> IO () (defined at t1.hs:2:1) ps2 :: forall a. a -> IO () (defined at t1.hs:5:1) putStrLn :: String -> IO () (imported from ‘Prelude’ at t1.hs:1:1 (and originally defined in ‘System.IO’)) fail :: forall (m :: * -> *). Monad m => forall a. String -> m a (imported from ‘Prelude’ at t1.hs:1:1 (and originally defined in ‘GHC.Base’)) mempty :: forall a. Monoid a => a (imported from ‘Prelude’ at t1.hs:1:1 (and originally defined in ‘GHC.Base’)) print :: forall a. Show a => a -> IO () (imported from ‘Prelude’ at t1.hs:1:1 (and originally defined in ‘System.IO’)) (Some substitutions suppressed; use -fmax-valid-substitutions=N or -fno-max-valid-substitutions) ``` Signed-off-by:
Matthías Páll Gissurarson <mpg@mpg.is> Modified according to suggestions from Simon PJ Accept tests that match the expectations, still a few to look better at Swithced to using tcLookup, after sit down with SPJ at ICFP. Implications are WIP. Now works with polymorphism and constraints! We still need to merge the latest master, before we can make a patch. Wrap the type of the hole, instead of implication shenanigans, As per SPJs suggestion, this is simpler and feels closer to what we actually want to do. Updated tests with the new implementation Remove debugging trace and update documentation Reviewers: austin, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: RyanGlScott, rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3930
-
- 19 Sep, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
This switches the compiler/ component to get compiled with -XNoImplicitPrelude and a `import GhcPrelude` is inserted in all modules. This is motivated by the upcoming "Prelude" re-export of `Semigroup((<>))` which would cause lots of name clashes in every modulewhich imports also `Outputable` Reviewers: austin, goldfire, bgamari, alanz, simonmar Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: goldfire, rwbarton, thomie, mpickering, bgamari Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3989
-
- 14 Sep, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Richard Eisenberg authored
GHC was complaining about numbers of arguments when the real problem is impredicativity. test case: typecheck/should_fail/T13909
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
I found (Trac #14175) that the tidying we do when reporting type error messages could cause a well-kinded type to become ill-kinded. Reason: we initialised the tidy-env with a completely un-zonked TidyEnv accumulated in the TcLclEnv as we come across lexical type-varialbe bindings. Solution: zonk them. But I ended up refactoring a bit: * Get rid of tcl_tidy :: TidyEnv altogether * Instead use tcl_bndrs :: TcBinderStack This used to contain only Ids, but now I've added those lexically scoped TyVars too. * Change names: TcIdBinderStack -> TcBinderStack TcIdBinder -> TcBinder extendTcIdBndrs -> extendTcBinderStack * Now tcInitTidyEnv can grab those TyVars from the tcl_bndrs, zonk, and tidy them. The only annoyance is that I had to add TcEnv.hs-boot, to break the recursion between the zonking code and the TrRnMonad functions like addErrTc that call tcInitTidyEnv. Tiresome, but in fact that file existed already.
-
- 09 Sep, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
IOW, code compiles -Wnoncanonical-monoid-instances clean now
-