- Sep 04, 2018
-
-
Summary: After a parse error in OPTIONS_GHC issue an error message instead of a compiler panic. Test Plan: make test TEST=T15053 Reviewers: Phyx, thomie, bgamari, monoidal, osa1 Reviewed By: Phyx, monoidal, osa1 Subscribers: tdammers, osa1, rwbarton, carter GHC Trac Issues: #15053 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D5093
-
- Aug 21, 2018
-
-
When parsing a nested comment or nested doc comment in the lexer, if we see a line starting with '#' we attempt to parse a #line pragma. This fixes how ghc handles output of the C preproccesor (-cpp flag) when the original source has C comments or pragmas inside haskell comments. Updates haddock submodule. Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie, carter GHC Trac Issues: #314 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4934
-
- Jul 06, 2018
-
-
Reviewers: Phyx Reviewed By: Phyx Subscribers: Phyx, rwbarton, thomie, carter GHC Trac Issues: #15053 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4883
-
- Jun 14, 2018
-
-
Vladislav Zavialov authored
Summary: Implement the "Embrace Type :: Type" GHC proposal, .../ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0020-no-type-in-type.rst GHC 8.0 included a major change to GHC's type system: the Type :: Type axiom. Though casual users were protected from this by hiding its features behind the -XTypeInType extension, all programs written in GHC 8+ have the axiom behind the scenes. In order to preserve backward compatibility, various legacy features were left unchanged. For example, with -XDataKinds but not -XTypeInType, GADTs could not be used in types. Now these restrictions are lifted and -XTypeInType becomes a redundant flag that will be eventually deprecated. * Incorporate the features currently in -XTypeInType into the -XPolyKinds and -XDataKinds extensions. * Introduce a new extension -XStarIsType to control how to parse * in code and whether to print it in error messages. Test Plan: Validate Reviewers: goldfire, hvr, bgamari, alanz, simonpj Reviewed By: goldfire, simonpj Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie, mpickering, carter GHC Trac Issues: #15195 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4748
-
- Jun 07, 2018
-
-
Ryan Scott authored
Currently, the primitive `(~#)`, `(~R#)`, and `(~P#)` type constructors are wired in to be exported from `GHC.Prim`. This has some unfortunate consequences, however. It turns out that `(~#)` is actually a legal infix identifier, so users can make use of unboxed equalities in strange ways in user code (see #15209). The other two, `(~R#)` and `(~P#)`, can't be used in source code, but they can be observed with GHCi's `:browse` command, which is somewhat unnerving. The fix for both of these problems is simple: just don't wire them to be exported from `GHC.Prim`. Test Plan: make test TEST="T12023 T15209" Reviewers: bgamari, dfeuer Reviewed By: bgamari, dfeuer Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie, carter, dfeuer GHC Trac Issues: #12023, #15209 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4801
-
- Apr 19, 2018
-
-
Tao He authored
For empty character literal, the `''`, report error message properly rather than just throw a "parser error" with wrong error location. Test Plan: make test TEST="T13450 T13450TH" Reviewers: goldfire, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: thomie, mpickering, carter GHC Trac Issues: #13450 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4594
-
- Mar 14, 2018
-
-
Ömer Sinan Ağacan authored
Given this program: main = do f $ do a <- return 3 c <- do return 5 GHC previously gave this error message: Main.hs:2:7: error: Parse error in pattern: do a <- return 3 c Possibly caused by a missing 'do'? | 2 | f $ do | ^^... What happened is GHC considered the whole `f $ do a <- return 3 c` as a pattern. When parsed as an expression it becomes an infix application of `($)`, and GHC checks left and right hand sides before checking if `($)` is a valid infix constructor name, and shows the first error it got. If instead we first check if the infix op is valid in pattern context, the error message becomes much clearer: Main.hs:2:3: error: Parse error in pattern: f $ do a <- return 3 c Possibly caused by a missing 'do'? | 2 | f $ do | ^^^^^^... This may not entirely fix #11188 but I think it's an improvement. Reviewers: bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie, carter GHC Trac Issues: #11188 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4497
-
- Mar 05, 2018
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This patch is preparatory for the main fix for Trac #13324 Here, we simplify rnLHsInstType so that it does not try to figure out the class name. This turns out to have a good (rather than bad) effect on error messages, and it prepares the way for the main event. Plus, less code!
-
- Feb 13, 2018
-
-
Tao He authored
Empty GADTs data declarations can't be identified in type checker. This patch adds additional checks in parser and raise a parse error when encounter empty GADTs declarations but extension `GADTs` is not enabled. Only empty declarations are checked in parser to avoid affecting existing error messages related to missing GADTs extension. This patch should fix issue 8258. Signed-off-by:
HE, Tao <sighingnow@gmail.com> Test Plan: make test TEST="T8258 T8258NoGADTs" Reviewers: bgamari, mpickering, alanz, RyanGlScott Reviewed By: bgamari, RyanGlScott Subscribers: adamse, RyanGlScott, rwbarton, thomie, mpickering, carter GHC Trac Issues: #8258 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4350
-
- Feb 01, 2018
-
-
Tao He authored
Fixes #14740. Test Plan: make test TEST="14740" Reviewers: bgamari, simonpj Reviewed By: simonpj Subscribers: simonpj, rwbarton, thomie, carter GHC Trac Issues: #14740 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4359
-
This patch implements the BlockArguments extension, as proposed at https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/90. It also fixes #10855 as a side-effect. This patch adds a large number of shift-reduce conflicts to the parser. All of them concern the ambiguity as to where constructs like `if` and `let` end. Fortunately they are resolved correctly by preferring shift. The patch is based on @gibiansky's ArgumentDo implementation (D1219). Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: goldfire, bgamari, alanz, mpickering Reviewed By: bgamari, mpickering Subscribers: Wizek, dfeuer, gibiansky, rwbarton, thomie, mpickering, carter GHC Trac Issues: #10843, #10855 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4260
-
- Jan 21, 2018
-
-
Implement the proposal of underscores in numeric literals. Underscores in numeric literals are simply ignored. The specification of the feature is available here: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/000 9-numeric-underscores.rst For a discussion of the various choices: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/76 Implementation detail: * Added dynamic flag * `NumericUnderscores` extension flag is added for this feature. * Alex "Regular expression macros" in Lexer.x * Add `@numspc` (numeric spacer) macro to represent multiple underscores. * Modify `@decimal`, `@decimal`, `@binary`, `@octal`, `@hexadecimal`, `@exponent`, and `@bin_exponent` macros to include `@numspc`. * Alex "Rules" in Lexer.x * To be simpler, we have only the definitions with underscores. And then we have a separate function (`tok_integral` and `tok_frac`) that validates the literals. * Validation functions in Lexer.x * `tok_integral` and `tok_frac` functions validate whether contain underscores or not. If `NumericUnderscores` extensions are not enabled, check that there are no underscores. * `tok_frac` function is created by merging `strtoken` and `init_strtoken`. * `init_strtoken` is deleted. Because it is no longer used. * Remove underscores from target literal string * `parseUnsignedInteger`, `readRational__`, and `readHexRational} use the customized `span'` function to remove underscores. * Added Testcase * testcase for NumericUnderscores enabled. NumericUnderscores0.hs and NumericUnderscores1.hs * testcase for NumericUnderscores disabled. NoNumericUnderscores0.hs and NoNumericUnderscores1.hs * testcase to invalid pattern for NumericUnderscores enabled. NumericUnderscoresFail0.hs and NumericUnderscoresFail1.hs Test Plan: `validate` including the above testcase Reviewers: goldfire, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: carter, rwbarton, thomie GHC Trac Issues: #14473 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4235
-
- Dec 21, 2017
-
-
Ryan Scott authored
Summary: Commit 37299536 inadvertently removed a check in the parser which rejected let-bindings with bang patterns, leading to #14588. This fixes it by creating a `hintBangPat` function to perform this check, and sprinkling it in the right places. Test Plan: make test TEST=T14588 Reviewers: bgamari, alanz, simonpj Reviewed By: bgamari, simonpj Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie, mpickering, carter GHC Trac Issues: #14588 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4270
-
- Oct 25, 2017
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
- Jul 28, 2017
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Trac #14000 showed up two errors * In TcRnTypes.dropInsolubles we dropped all implications, which might contain the very insolubles we wanted to keep. This was an outright error, and is why the out-of-scope error was actually lost altogether in Trac #14000 * In TcSimplify.simplifyInfer, if there are definite (insoluble) errors, it's better to suppress the following ambiguity test, because the type may be bogus anyway. See TcSimplify Note [Quantification with errors]. This fix seems a bit clunky, but it'll do for now.
-
- Jul 11, 2017
-
-
Ryan Scott authored
Commit 343cb32d (#13568) made GHC a bit too cavalier in suggesting when data constructors are in scope (and suggesting the use of `DataKinds`). This tones down the suggestions so that `DataKinds` is only suggested if a data constructor of that name is actually in scope (previously, it would always suggest, even if it was out of scope). Fixes #13948. Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: mpickering, austin, bgamari Reviewed By: mpickering Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie GHC Trac Issues: #13948 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3719
-
- May 15, 2017
-
-
Test Plan: validate Reviewers: austin, bgamari, simonmar, mpickering Reviewed By: mpickering Subscribers: mpickering, rwbarton, thomie GHC Trac Issues: #12610 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3584
-
- May 11, 2017
-
-
Given multiple in-scope constructors with the same name, say `A`, and a function of type `A -> Int`, say, the compiler reports both a "type `A` is not in scope" and (incorrectly) an ambiguity error. The latter shouldn't be there if `DataKinds` isn't enabled. This issue was recommended to me by @mpickering as a suitable first task, and the fix was also outlined in the original Trac ticket. It involved a simple reordering of the steps taken in `lookup_demoted` in `RnEnv.hs`. The fix is to make the `DataKinds` check happen earlier, ensuring that the ambiguity check doesn't happen at all if we know the constructors couldn't have been promoted. Signed-off-by:
Soham Chowdhury <chow.soham@gmail.com> Reviewers: mpickering, austin, bgamari Reviewed By: mpickering, bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie GHC Trac Issues: #13568 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3547
-
- Mar 29, 2017
-
-
Changes in a few different places to catch several different types of error related to RecursiveDo Signed-off-by:
Rupert Horlick <ruperthorlick@gmail.com> Test Plan: Three test cases, with further tests in comments Reviewers: austin, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3271
-
- Mar 13, 2017
-
-
This corrects the line numbers for literate code after a shebang. Fixes #13414. Test Plan: validate Reviewers: austin, bgamari, trofi Reviewed By: bgamari, trofi Subscribers: trofi, rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3333
-
- Mar 10, 2017
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
In error messages like this • Couldn't match type ‘c’ with ‘f0 (a -> b)’ ‘c’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for: f :: ((a -> b) -> b) -> forall c. c -> a we need to take case both to actually show that 'forall c', and to make sure that its name lines with the 'c' in the error message. This has been shaky for some time, and this commit puts it on solid ground. See TcRnTypes: Note [SigSkol SkolemInfo] The main changes are * SigSkol gets an extra field that records the way in which the type signature was skolemised. * The type in SigSkol is now the /un/-skolemised version * pprSkolemInfo uses the info to make the tidy type line up nicely Lots of error message wibbles!
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
TcSimplify.decideQuantification was doing the Wrong Thing when "growing" the type variables to quantify over. We were trying to do this on a tyvar set where we'd split off the dependent type varaibles; and we just got it wrong. A kind variable wasn't being generalised properly, with confusing knock on consequences. All this led to Trac #13371 and Trac #13393. This commit tidies it all up: * The type TcDepVars is renamed as CandidateQTvs; and splitDepVarsOfType to candidateQTyVarsOfType * The code in TcSimplify.decideQuantification is simpler. It no longer does the tricky "grow" stuff over TcDepVars. Instead it use ordinary VarSets (thereby eliminating the nasty growThetaTyVarsDSet) and uses that to filter the result of candidateQTyVarsOfType. * I documented that candidateQTyVarsOfType returns the type variables in a good order in which to quantify, and rewrote it to use an accumulator pattern, so that we would predicatably get left-to-right ordering. In doing all this I also made UniqDFM behave a little more nicely: * When inserting an element that is there already, keep the old tag, while still overwriting with the new value. * This means that when doing udfmToList we get back elements in the order they were originally inserted, rather than in reverse order. It's not a big deal, but in a subsequent commit I use it to improve the order of type variables in inferred types. All this led to a lot of error message wibbles: - changing the order of quantified variables - changing the order in which instances are listed in GHCi - changing the tidying of variables in typechecker erors There's a submodule update for 'array' because one of its tests has an error-message change. I may not have associated all of them with the correct commit.
-
- Mar 06, 2017
-
-
Signed-off-by:
Rupert Horlick <ruperthorlick@gmail.com> Reviewers: austin, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: rwbarton, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3286
-
- Mar 03, 2017
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
It's unclear why this didn't show up in my initial local validation. Oh well.
-
Added a check for whether RankNTypes is enabled and changed error message accordingly Reviewers: austin, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: thomie, mpickering Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3262
-
Reviewers: austin, bgamari Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3261
-
- Feb 09, 2017
-
-
Gabor Greif authored
-
- Oct 21, 2016
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
This patch does a raft of useful tidy-ups in the type checker. I've been meaning to do this for some time, and finally made time to do it en route to ICFP. 1. Modify TcType.ExpType to make a distinct data type, InferResult for the Infer case, and consequential refactoring. 2. Define a new function TcUnify.fillInferResult, to fill in an InferResult. It uses TcMType.promoteTcType to promote the type to the level of the InferResult. See TcMType Note [Promoting a type] This refactoring is in preparation for an improvement to typechecking pattern bindings, coming next. I flirted with an elaborate scheme to give better higher rank inference, but it was just too complicated. See TcMType Note [Promotion and higher rank types] 3. Add to InferResult a new field ir_inst :: Bool to say whether or not the type used to fill in the InferResult should be deeply instantiated. See TcUnify Note [Deep instantiation of InferResult]. 4. Add a TcLevel to SkolemTvs. This will be useful generally - it's a fast way to see if the type variable escapes when floating (not used yet) - it provides a good consistency check when updating a unification variable (TcMType.writeMetaTyVarRef, the level_check_ok check) I originally had another reason (related to the flirting in (2), but I left it in because it seems like a step in the right direction. 5. Reduce and simplify the plethora of uExpType, tcSubType and related functions in TcUnify. It was such an opaque mess and it's still not great, but it's better. 6. Simplify the uo_expected field of TypeEqOrigin. Richard had generatlised it to a ExpType, but it was almost always a Check type. Now it's back to being a plain TcType which is much, much easier. 7. Improve error messages by refraining from skolemisation when it's clear that there's an error: see TcUnify Note [Don't skolemise unnecessarily] 8. Type.isPiTy and isForAllTy seem to be missing a coreView check, so I added it 9. Kill off tcs_used_tcvs. Its purpose is to track the givens used by wanted constraints. For dictionaries etc we do that via the free vars of the /bindings/ in the implication constraint ic_binds. But for coercions we just do update-in-place in the type, rather than generating a binding. So we need something analogous to bindings, to track what coercions we have added. That was the purpose of tcs_used_tcvs. But it only worked for a /single/ iteration, whereas we may have multiple iterations of solving an implication. Look at (the old) 'setImplicationStatus'. If the constraint is unsolved, it just drops the used_tvs on the floor. If it becomes solved next time round, we'll pick up coercions used in that round, but ignore ones used in the first round. There was an outright bug. Result = (potentialy) bogus unused-constraint errors. Constructing a case where this actually happens seems quite trick so I did not do so. Solution: expand EvBindsVar to include the (free vars of the) coercions, so that the coercions are tracked in essentially the same way as the bindings. This turned out to be much simpler. Less code, more correct. 10. Make the ic_binds field in an implication have type ic_binds :: EvBindsVar instead of (as previously) ic_binds :: Maybe EvBindsVar This is notably simpler, and faster to use -- less testing of the Maybe. But in the occaional situation where we don't have anywhere to put the bindings, the belt-and-braces error check is lost. So I put it back as an ASSERT in 'setImplicationStatus' (see the use of 'termEvidenceAllowed') All these changes led to quite bit of error message wibbling
-
- Oct 01, 2016
-
-
Ryan Scott authored
Allows users to explicitly request which approach to `deriving` to use via keywords, e.g., ``` newtype Foo = Foo Bar deriving Eq deriving stock Ord deriving newtype Show ``` Fixes #10598. Updates haddock submodule. Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: hvr, kosmikus, goldfire, alanz, bgamari, simonpj, austin, erikd, simonmar Reviewed By: alanz, bgamari, simonpj Subscribers: thomie, mpickering, oerjan Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2280 GHC Trac Issues: #10598
-
- Jun 20, 2016
-
-
Thomas Miedema authored
-
- Jun 15, 2016
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
Before this patch, following the TypeInType innovations, each TyCon had two lists: - tyConBinders :: [TyBinder] - tyConTyVars :: [TyVar] They were in 1-1 correspondence and contained overlapping information. More broadly, there were many places where we had to pass around this pair of lists, instead of a single list. This commit tidies all that up, by having just one list of binders in a TyCon: - tyConBinders :: [TyConBinder] The new data types look like this: Var.hs: data TyVarBndr tyvar vis = TvBndr tyvar vis data VisibilityFlag = Visible | Specified | Invisible type TyVarBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar VisibilityFlag TyCon.hs: type TyConBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar TyConBndrVis data TyConBndrVis = NamedTCB VisibilityFlag | AnonTCB TyCoRep.hs: data TyBinder = Named TyVarBinder | Anon Type Note that Var.TyVarBdr has moved from TyCoRep and has been made polymorphic in the tyvar and visiblity fields: type TyVarBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar VisibilityFlag -- Used in ForAllTy type TyConBinder = TyVarBndr TyVar TyConBndrVis -- Used in TyCon type IfaceForAllBndr = TyVarBndr IfaceTvBndr VisibilityFlag type IfaceTyConBinder = TyVarBndr IfaceTvBndr TyConBndrVis -- Ditto, in interface files There are a zillion knock-on changes, but everything arises from these types. It was a bit fiddly to get the module loops to work out right! Some smaller points ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * Nice new functions TysPrim.mkTemplateKiTyVars TysPrim.mkTemplateTyConBinders which help you make the tyvar binders for dependently-typed TyCons. See comments with their definition. * The change showed up a bug in TcGenGenerics.tc_mkRepTy, where the code was making an assumption about the order of the kind variables in the kind of GHC.Generics.(:.:). I fixed this; see TcGenGenerics.mkComp.
-
- May 19, 2016
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
A minor parser issue, allowing a mal-formed data constructor through.
-
- May 18, 2016
-
-
niteria authored
I haven't observed this to have an effect on nondeterminism, but tidyOccName appears to modify the TidyOccEnv in a way dependent on the order of inputs. It's easy enough to change it to be deterministic to be on the safe side. Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: simonmar, austin, bgamari, simonpj Reviewed By: simonpj Subscribers: thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2238 GHC Trac Issues: #4012
-
- Apr 26, 2016
-
-
niteria authored
varSetElemsWellScoped introduces unnecessary non-determinism in inferred type signatures. Removing this instance required changing the representation of TcDepVars to use deterministic sets. This is the last occurence of varSetElemsWellScoped, allowing me to finally remove it. Test Plan: ./validate I will update the expected outputs when commiting, some reordering of type variables in types is expected. Reviewers: goldfire, simonpj, austin, bgamari Reviewed By: simonpj Subscribers: thomie, simonmar Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2135 GHC Trac Issues: #4012
-
- Feb 25, 2016
-
-
Thomas Miedema authored
-
- Feb 23, 2016
-
-
Thomas Miedema authored
-
Thomas Miedema authored
-
Thomas Miedema authored
-
- Feb 19, 2016
-
-
Thomas Miedema authored
Refactoring only. Cleanup some loose ends from #10196. Initially the idea was to only allow modifier letters at the end of identifiers. Since we later decided to allow modifier letters also in the middle of identifiers (because not doing so would not fix the regression completely), the names `suffix` and `okIdSuffixChar` don't seem appropriate anymore. Remove TODO. Move test from should_fail to should_compile.
-
- Feb 17, 2016
-
-
Thomas Miedema authored
Since we're not consisently keeping track of which tests should pass with which compiler versions, there is no point in keeping these functions. Update submodules containers, hpc and stm.
-