Don't expose strictness when sm_inline is False
This is very much a corner case, but Trac #15163 showed that if you have a RULE like forall x. f (g x) = ..x.. and g = undefined, then the simplifier is likely to discard that 'x' argument. It is usually right to do so; but not here because then x is used on the right but not bound on the left. The fix is a narrow one, aimed at this rather pathalogical case. See Note [Do not expose strictness if sm_inline=False] in SimplUtils.
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment