- 18 Dec, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
-
- 08 Nov, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Alec Theriault authored
Summary: This matches exactly the 'Read (Array i e)' instance defined in base. Note that the same thing is being done for 'Show (UArray i e)'. Reviewers: RyanGlScott, bgamari GHC Trac Issues: #11335 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D5156
-
- 04 Oct, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
- 13 May, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Chaitanya Koparkar authored
Summary: The old Travis script still had targets to test against GHC < 8.0, and wasn't using Cabal `new-build` among other things. Reviewers: bgamari, RyanGlScott Reviewed By: RyanGlScott Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4681
-
- 10 Apr, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Ryan Scott authored
See https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/15018.
-
- 19 Mar, 2018 1 commit
-
-
David Feuer authored
Summary: These have shifted out of the support window. Reviewers: bgamari, hvr, RyanGlScott Reviewed By: RyanGlScott Subscribers: RyanGlScott Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4499
-
- 15 Sep, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
- 03 Jul, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
-
- 01 May, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
The fact that this was previously hidden appears to be an oversight and I've needed it at least once.
-
- 30 Apr, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
The recent overflow check made the code stop working w/ prior versions of GHC. But there's little benefit in support much older GHCs, so it's easier to just cut the support window.
-
- 02 Apr, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
The ghc-8.2 and master branches disagree on the order of the instances. Normalise this difference away.
-
- 31 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
- 26 Mar, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
- 25 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
Previously it failed with, -T229: Data.Array.Base.safe_scale: Overflow; scale: 4, n: 4611686018427387904 -CallStack (from HasCallStack): - error, called at libraries/array/Data/Array/Base.hs ... +T229: Ix{Int}.index: Index (17) out of range ((0,-1))
-
- 10 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
- 14 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
- 09 Feb, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
Ben Gamari authored
No overflow check is necessary in the case of Bool arrays since the array size is actually smaller than the number of elements it contains. Moreover, we can use setByteArray# to initialize the array.
-
- 07 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Oleg Grenrus authored
-
- 26 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
As akio points out, the fix to #229 which I authored previously was blatantly wrong.
-
- 15 Dec, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
Ben Gamari authored
Fixes GHC #4505.
-
- 15 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
- 08 Jul, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Bartosz Nitka authored
Changing InstEnv to UniqDFM changes the order some things get printed
-
- 17 Apr, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
-
Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
-
- 23 Dec, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
- 15 Dec, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Ben Gamari authored
-
- 04 Nov, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Simon Marlow authored
-
- 28 Oct, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
-
- 21 Oct, 2015 1 commit
-
-
thomie authored
-
- 06 Aug, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Eric Seidel authored
-
- 30 Jul, 2015 1 commit
-
-
thomie authored
-
- 18 Jul, 2015 1 commit
-
-
thomie authored
-
- 07 Apr, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
- 10 Mar, 2015 2 commits
-
-
Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
This adds CPP guards around the changes in c9f20718
-
Herbert Valerio Riedel authored
This way the type-role addition in 4baaf0b6 becomes be detectable via `MIN_VERSION_array()`
-
- 06 Jan, 2015 2 commits
-
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-
Simon Peyton Jones authored
-