Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

full tests for issue GHC#23279

Closed Bartłomiej Cieślar requested to merge barci2/ghc-dev:#23279-tests into master

This MR adds full tests for issue #23279 (closed) related to the lack of emitting of DEPRECATED pragma in several cases of using it with record fields

Edited by Bartłomiej Cieślar

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • Fine by me, although you committed ghc-prim.cabal and two submodule updates (text and haddock) by mistake.

  • added 1 commit

    Compare with previous version

  • added 1 commit

    Compare with previous version

  • added 1 commit

    Compare with previous version

  • added 1 commit

    Compare with previous version

  • Bartłomiej Cieślar resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • added 1 commit

    Compare with previous version

  • Could you edit the commit message with a bit more information? Something like the following:

    Add cases to T23279: HasField for deprecated record fields
    
    This commit adds additional tests from ticket #23279 to ensure that we don't
    regress on reporting deprecated record fields in conjunction with HasField,
    either when using overloaded record dot syntax or directly through `getField`.
    
    Fixes #23279
  • sheaf approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • added 1 commit

    • 00318e13 - Add cases to T23279: HasField for deprecated record fields

    Compare with previous version

  • I will attempt to batch this MR (!11001 (closed))...

  • Batch MR !11001 (closed) failed: CI failed! I will retry later...

  • I will attempt to batch this MR (!11002 (closed))...

  • Batch MR !11002 (closed) failed: CI failed! I will retry later...

  • I will attempt to batch this MR (!11004 (closed))...

  • Batch MR !11004 (closed) failed: CI failed! I will retry later...

  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading