... | ... | @@ -82,6 +82,26 @@ Disadvantages: |
|
|
|
|
|
- Lack of good Windows support?
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Bzr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Fairly fast
|
|
|
- Portable (as portable as python, anyhow)
|
|
|
- Merging works correctly based on closest-common-ancestor
|
|
|
- Tracking of renamed files / directories merges correctly
|
|
|
- Revisions form a DAG (more like a tree with merge-points) rather than patchsets
|
|
|
- Supports convenient "centralised-style" commit-remote-by-default as well as "distributed-style" commit-local-by-default. Just 'bind' or 'unbind' your branch whenever you want.
|
|
|
- Simple clear UI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disadvantages
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Revisions form a DAG (more like a tree with merge-points) rather than patchsets (this is a subjective point, which is why it's in both lists. Which model do you believe in?)
|
|
|
- Cherry-picking isn't very "native" to the data model.
|
|
|
- UI is rather different from darcs (which current contributors are used to).
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Darcs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
... | ... | @@ -141,4 +161,6 @@ Posts/blogs: |
|
|
|
|
|
- [ Hans Fugal: Mercurial and Darcs](http://hans.fugal.net/blog/articles/2007/11/16/mercurial-and-darcs)
|
|
|
- [ Hans Fugal: Darcs and Mercurial Redux](http://hans.fugal.net/blog/articles/2007/11/20/darcs-and-mercurial-redux)
|
|
|
- [ iBanjo: The Risks of Distributed Version Control](http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=20) |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
|
|
- [ iBanjo: The Risks of Distributed Version Control](http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=20)
|
|
|
- [ https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2007q4/033256.html](https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2007q4/033256.html)
|
|
|
- [ http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrVsGit](http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrVsGit) |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |